Literature DB >> 30036699

Phylogenomic analysis on the exceptionally diverse fish clade Gobioidei (Actinopterygii: Gobiiformes) and data-filtering based on molecular clocklikeness.

Ting Kuang1, Luke Tornabene2, Jingyan Li1, Jiamei Jiang1, Prosanta Chakrabarty3, John S Sparks4, Gavin J P Naylor5, Chenhong Li6.   

Abstract

The use of genome-scale data to infer phylogenetic relationships has gained in popularity in recent years due to the progress made in target-gene capture and sequencing techniques. Data filtering, the approach of excluding data inconsistent with the model from analyses, presumably could alleviate problems caused by systematic errors in phylogenetic inference. Different data filtering criteria, such as those based on evolutionary rate and molecular clocklikeness as well as others have been proposed for selecting useful phylogenetic markers, yet few studies have tested these criteria using phylogenomic data. We developed a novel set of single-copy nuclear coding markers to capture thousands of target genes in gobioid fishes, a species-rich lineages of vertebrates, and tested the effects of data-filtering methods based on substitution rate and molecular clocklikeness while attempting to control for the compounding effects of missing data and variation in locus length. We found that molecular clocklikeness was a better predictor than overall substitution rate for phylogenetic usefulness of molecular markers in our study. In addition, when the 100 best ranked loci for our predictors were concatenated and analyzed using maximum likelihood, or combined in a coalescent-based species-tree analysis, the resulting trees showed a well-resolved topology of Gobioidei that mostly agrees with previous studies. However, trees generated from the 100 least clocklike frequently recovered conflicting, and in some cases clearly erroneous topologies with strong support, thus indicating strong systematic biases in those datasets. Collectively these results suggest that data filtering has the potential improve the performance of phylogenetic inference when using both a concatenation approach as well as methods that rely on input from individual gene trees (i.e. coalescent species-tree approaches), which may be preferred in scenarios where incomplete lineage sorting is likely to be an issue.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data filtering; Gobioidei; Molecular clocklikeness; Phylogenetics; Phylogenomics; Target-gene enrichment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30036699     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.07.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  5 in total

1.  Correlation between acoustic divergence and phylogenetic distance in soniferous European gobiids (Gobiidae; Gobius lineage).

Authors:  Sven Horvatić; Stefano Malavasi; Jasna Vukić; Radek Šanda; Zoran Marčić; Marko Ćaleta; Massimo Lorenzoni; Perica Mustafić; Ivana Buj; Lucija Onorato; Lucija Ivić; Francesco Cavraro; Davor Zanella
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Excluding Loci With Substitution Saturation Improves Inferences From Phylogenomic Data.

Authors:  David A Duchêne; Niklas Mather; Cara Van Der Wal; Simon Y W Ho
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 9.160

3.  Evolutionary Rate Variation among Lineages in Gene Trees has a Negative Impact on Species-Tree Inference.

Authors:  Mezzalina Vankan; Simon Y W Ho; David A Duchêne
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Rapid evolution fuels transcriptional plasticity to ocean acidification.

Authors:  Jingliang Kang; Ivan Nagelkerken; Jodie L Rummer; Riccardo Rodolfo-Metalpa; Philip L Munday; Timothy Ravasi; Celia Schunter
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 13.211

5.  Gonad morphology of Rhyacichthys aspro (Valenciennes, 1837), and the diagnostic reproductive morphology of gobioid fishes.

Authors:  Kathleen S Cole; Lynne R Parenti
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 1.966

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.