Literature DB >> 30036653

A machine-learning framework for automatic reference-free quality assessment in MRI.

T Küstner1, S Gatidis2, A Liebgott3, M Schwartz4, L Mauch5, P Martirosian6, H Schmidt2, N F Schwenzer2, K Nikolaou2, F Bamberg2, B Yang5, F Schick6.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers a wide variety of imaging techniques. A large amount of data is created per examination which needs to be checked for sufficient quality in order to derive a meaningful diagnosis. This is a manual process and therefore time- and cost-intensive. Any imaging artifacts originating from scanner hardware, signal processing or induced by the patient may reduce the image quality and complicate the diagnosis or any image post-processing. Therefore, the assessment or the ensurance of sufficient image quality in an automated manner is of high interest. Usually no reference image is available or difficult to define. Therefore, classical reference-based approaches are not applicable. Model observers mimicking the human observers (HO) can assist in this task. Thus, we propose a new machine-learning-based reference-free MR image quality assessment framework which is trained on HO-derived labels to assess MR image quality immediately after each acquisition. We include the concept of active learning and present an efficient blinded reading platform to reduce the effort in the HO labeling procedure. Derived image features and the applied classifiers (support-vector-machine, deep neural network) are investigated for a cohort of 250 patients. The MR image quality assessment framework can achieve a high test accuracy of 93.7% for estimating quality classes on a 5-point Likert-scale. The proposed MR image quality assessment framework is able to provide an accurate and efficient quality estimation which can be used as a prospective quality assurance including automatic acquisition adaptation or guided MR scanner operation, and/or as a retrospective quality assessment including support of diagnostic decisions or quality control in cohort studies.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Image quality assessment; Machine-learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Non-reference/blind

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30036653     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  11 in total

1.  Automated image quality evaluation of structural brain MRI using an ensemble of deep learning networks.

Authors:  Sheeba J Sujit; Ivan Coronado; Arash Kamali; Ponnada A Narayana; Refaat E Gabr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Ultimate MRI.

Authors:  Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Potential of a machine-learning model for dose optimization in CT quality assurance.

Authors:  Axel Meineke; Christian Rubbert; Lino M Sawicki; Christoph Thomas; Yan Klosterkemper; Elisabeth Appel; Julian Caspers; Oliver T Bethge; Patric Kröpil; Gerald Antoch; Johannes Boos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Recommendation for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Phenotypic Study: Imaging Part.

Authors:  Chengyan Wang; Yan Li; Jun Lv; Jianhua Jin; Xumei Hu; Xutong Kuang; Weibo Chen; He Wang
Journal:  Phenomics       Date:  2021-07-28

5.  Artifact- and content-specific quality assessment for MRI with image rulers.

Authors:  Ke Lei; Ali B Syed; Xucheng Zhu; John M Pauly; Shreyas S Vasanawala
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 6.  How Machine Learning is Powering Neuroimaging to Improve Brain Health.

Authors:  Nalini M Singh; Jordan B Harrod; Sandya Subramanian; Mitchell Robinson; Ken Chang; Suheyla Cetin-Karayumak; Adrian Vasile Dalca; Simon Eickhoff; Michael Fox; Loraine Franke; Polina Golland; Daniel Haehn; Juan Eugenio Iglesias; Lauren J O'Donnell; Yangming Ou; Yogesh Rathi; Shan H Siddiqi; Haoqi Sun; M Brandon Westover; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Randy L Gollub
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2022-03-28

7.  Convolutional neural network-automated hepatobiliary phase adequacy evaluation may optimize examination time.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Kyle A Hasenstab; Atsushi Higaki; Kang Wang; Timo Delgado; Ryan L Brunsing; Alexandra Schlein; Armin Schwartzman; Albert Hsiao; Claude B Sirlin; Katie J Fowler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Artificial intelligence deep learning algorithm for discriminating ungradable optical coherence tomography three-dimensional volumetric optic disc scans.

Authors:  An Ran Ran; Jian Shi; Amanda K Ngai; Wai-Yin Chan; Poemen P Chan; Alvin L Young; Hon-Wah Yung; Clement C Tham; Carol Y Cheung
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.593

9.  Hierarchical Nonlocal Residual Networks for Image Quality Assessment of Pediatric Diffusion MRI With Limited and Noisy Annotations.

Authors:  Siyuan Liu; Kim-Han Thung; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen; Pew-Thian Yap
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Automatic CNN-based detection of cardiac MR motion artefacts using k-space data augmentation and curriculum learning.

Authors:  Ilkay Oksuz; Bram Ruijsink; Esther Puyol-Antón; James R Clough; Gastao Cruz; Aurelien Bustin; Claudia Prieto; Rene Botnar; Daniel Rueckert; Julia A Schnabel; Andrew P King
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 8.545

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.