Literature DB >> 30036614

Prostate Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Results From a Prospective FDA-Approved Investigational Device Exemption Study.

Riad Salem1, John Hairston2, Elias Hohlastos3, Ahsun Riaz3, Joseph Kallini3, Ahmed Gabr3, Rehan Ali3, Kimberly Jenkins3, Jennifer Karp3, Kush Desai3, Bartley Thornburg3, David Casalino4, Frank Miller4, Matthias Hofer2, Nabeel Hamoui2, Samdeep Mouli3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of prostate artery embolization (PAE) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
METHODS: A prospective, single-center, open-label FDA-approved study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PAE for LUTS secondary to BPH. We enrolled men ≥ 45, prostate volume > 40 g, International prostate symptom score (IPSS) > 13, peak flow rate (Qmax) ≤ 12 mL/s, and voided volume ≥ 125 mL. Patients were evaluated with questionnaires (IPSS, quality-of-life [QoL], International index of erectile function, and male sexual health questionnaire for ejaculatory dysfunction) and clinical measures (postvoid residual volume and Qmax at baseline 1, 3, and 12 months) after PAE. Baseline and 6-month total prostate (TV) and central gland (CG) volumes were obtained.
RESULTS: 45 patients (mean volume: 99 cc, range: 30-214 g) were treated over the course of the 3-year study. At 1 month, there were improvements in IPSS (23.6 ± 6.1 to 12.0 ± 5.9, P < .0001), QoL (4.8 ± 0.9 to 2.6 ± 1.6, P < .0001), Qmax (5.8 ± 1.0 to 12.4 ± 6.8,P < .0001). At 3 months, there were improvements in IPSS (10.2 ± 6.0, P < .0001), QoL (2.4 ± 1.6, P < .0001) and Qmax (15.3 ± 12.3, P < .0001). At 6 months, there were improvements in IPSS (11.0 ± 7.6, P < .0001) and QoL (2.3 ± 1.7, P < .0001). At 1 year, there were improvements in IPSS (12.4 ± 8.4,P < .0001) and QoL (2.6 ± 1.6, P < .0001). There were reductions in postvoid volume residues: baseline 157 ± 45, 1 month 123 ± 47, P = .057, 3 months 127 ± 114, P = .34, 6 months 112±116, P = .002 and 1 year 109±116 P = .025. Median decreases in TV and CG were 18% (CI: 13-27) (P = 0.0001) and 27% (CI: 20-36)(P = 0.0001), respectively. Self-limited adverse events included dysuria (n = 13), hematuria (n = 6), hematospermia (n = 2), urinary frequency (n = 3) and retention (n = 2). No severe adverse events, nontarget embolization, or adverse effects on erectile function or sexual health.
CONCLUSION: This prospective clinical trial demonstrates that PAE is safe and efficacious for BPH, with significant improvement in LUTS and reduction in TV and CG volumes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30036614     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  Prostate Artery Embolization.

Authors:  Samdeep Mouli; Elias Hohlastos; Riad Salem
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Prostate arterial chemoembolization for treatment of refractory hematuria and urinary retention in patients with localized advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bing Yuan; Hainan Xin; Jin Xin Fu; Mao Qiang Wang; Jin Long Zhang; Feng Duan; Hui Yi Ye; Hong Kai Yu; Dui-Ping Feng; Kai Cheng; Xiu Jun Zhang
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 5.554

3.  Long-Term Efficacy and Recurrence Prediction of Prostatic Artery Embolization for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Zhong-Wei Xu; Chun-Gao Zhou; Wei Tian; Hai-Bin Shi; Sheng Liu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 4.  Modern imaging and image-guided treatments of the prostate gland: MR and ablation for cancer and prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  João Lopes Dias; Tiago Bilhim
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-08-14

Review 5.  New Ultra-minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Comparative Outcomes.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Alessandro Veccia; Sabrina De Cillis; Federico Piramide; Gabriele Volpi; Daniele Amparore; Angela Pecoraro; Alberto Piana; Stefano Granato; Paolo Verri; Michele Sica; Juliette Meziere; Beatrice Carbonaro; Stefano Piscitello; Davide Zamengo; Giovanni Cacciamani; Zhamshid Okhunov; Stefano Puliatti; Mark Taratkin; Josè Marenco; Juan Gomez Rivas; Domenico Veneziano; Umberto Carbonara; Giorgio Ivan Russo; Stefano De Luca; Matteo Manfredi; Cristian Fiori; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

Review 6.  Ejaculations and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Impossible Compromise? A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Nicolas Couteau; Igor Duquesne; Panthier Frédéric; Nicolas Thiounn; Marc-Olivier Timsit; Arnaud Mejean; Ugo Pinar; François Audenet
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Semi-Automatic MRI Feature Assessment in Small- and Medium-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia after Prostatic Artery Embolization.

Authors:  Vanessa F Schmidt; Mirjam Schirren; Maurice M Heimer; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Clemens C Cyran; Moritz Wildgruber; Max Seidensticker; Jens Ricke; Olga Solyanik
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.