OBJECTIVE: Establishing an accurate histologic diagnosis is essential for determining the appropriate course of therapy for ovarian cancer. This study sought to investigate and describe nonovarian cancer pathologies discovered during the systematic laparoscopic workup of presumed advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with presumed advanced ovarian cancer (based on elevated CA125 and/or imaging) presenting to our center without confirmed pathologic diagnosis were identified and characterized. Patients without ovarian cancer on final pathology were described and compared with those with confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Nonovarian cancer was found in 26 (7.1%) of 365 cases over 3.5 years of study, and included benign ovarian pathology, and metastatic uterine, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers. Most nonovarian cancer cases could not be diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy, and instead used diagnostic laparoscopy or assessment at the time of laparotomy for diagnosis (58%). No patient received inappropriate treatment. Nonovarian cancer cases were more likely to be nonwhite (P = 0.003), have a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P < 0.001), and have a lower CA125 value (P < 0.001), and were less likely to have pleural effusions (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A systematic laparoscopic triage approach to advanced-stage ovarian cancer eliminates incorrect neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration and inappropriate laparotomy. This algorithm identified a population of women who are more likely to have nonovarian cancer pathology. Increasing screening efforts should be focused on conclusive diagnosis with the least invasive testing possible.
OBJECTIVE: Establishing an accurate histologic diagnosis is essential for determining the appropriate course of therapy for ovarian cancer. This study sought to investigate and describe nonovarian cancer pathologies discovered during the systematic laparoscopic workup of presumed advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients with presumed advanced ovarian cancer (based on elevated CA125 and/or imaging) presenting to our center without confirmed pathologic diagnosis were identified and characterized. Patients without ovarian cancer on final pathology were described and compared with those with confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer using standard statistical methods. RESULTS: Nonovarian cancer was found in 26 (7.1%) of 365 cases over 3.5 years of study, and included benign ovarian pathology, and metastatic uterine, breast, and gastrointestinal cancers. Most nonovarian cancer cases could not be diagnosed with percutaneous biopsy, and instead used diagnostic laparoscopy or assessment at the time of laparotomy for diagnosis (58%). No patient received inappropriate treatment. Nonovarian cancer cases were more likely to be nonwhite (P = 0.003), have a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (P < 0.001), and have a lower CA125 value (P < 0.001), and were less likely to have pleural effusions (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A systematic laparoscopic triage approach to advanced-stage ovarian cancer eliminates incorrect neoadjuvant chemotherapy administration and inappropriate laparotomy. This algorithm identified a population of women who are more likely to have nonovarian cancer pathology. Increasing screening efforts should be focused on conclusive diagnosis with the least invasive testing possible.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Natalia Rodriguez Gómez-Hidalgo; Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon; Alpa M Nick; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Rafael S Tomacruz; Deborah K Armstrong; Edward L Trimble; F J Montz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M J Hewitt; K Anderson; G D Hall; M Weston; R Hutson; N Wilkinson; T J Perren; G Lane; J A Spencer Journal: BJOG Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Paolo Castellucci; Anna M Perrone; Maria Picchio; Tullio Ghi; Mohsen Farsad; Cristina Nanni; Cristina Messa; Maria C Meriggiola; Giuseppe Pelusi; Adil Al-Nahhas; Domenico Rubello; Ferruccio Fazio; Stefano Fanti Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Yukio Sonoda; Sharon Wen-Wen Chen; Raja M Flores; Robert Downey; Carol Aghajanian; Richard R Barakat Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Stuart Keeble; Gary A Abel; Catherine L Saunders; Sean McPhail; Fiona M Walter; Richard D Neal; Gregory P Rubin; Georgios Lyratzopoulos Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 7.396