Literature DB >> 30035756

Helical Blade Versus Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Hip Fractures With Cephalomedullary Devices: Incidence of Failure and Atypical "Medial Cutout".

Talia Chapman1, Benjamin Zmistowski1, James Krieg2, Seth Stake1, Christopher M Jones2,3, Eric Levicoff2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rates and mechanisms of failure for cephalomedullary nail fixation using helical blade versus screw fixation and to identify the predictors of failure.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Community teaching hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 126 patients were treated with cephalomedullary fixation for low-energy hip fractures. INTERVENTION: All procedures used the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (Synthes) with either a helical blade [71 (56.3%)] or screw [55 (43.7%)]. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Failures, defined by nonunion, hardware cutout, and need for revision surgery were independently reviewed by a fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon for an assessment of reduction quality and hardware placement.
RESULTS: Seven failures of fixation (5.6%) occurred, all of which used a helical blade. Five failures resulted from medial migration of the helical blade through the femoral head, whereas 2 resulted from typical superolateral cutout and varus collapse. There was no difference in the average tip apex distance between the cases using blade versus screw fixation or between failures and the remainder of the cohort. Basicervical fractures had a significantly higher rate of failure than other fracture patterns.
CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a higher failure rate with use of the blade and supports the use of screw fixation in these fractures. In addition, we confirm an atypical mode of failure, lateral migration of the femoral head with protrusion of the helical blade, which contributes significantly to the overall failure rate of this implant and occurs despite appropriate fracture reduction and hardware placement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30035756     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  9 in total

1.  Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Kayla Pfaff; Michael Heffner; Noelle Van Rysselberghe; Malcolm R DeBaun; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 2.  Reoperation rates after proximal femur fracture fixation with single and dual screw femoral nails: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arjun Sivakumar; Suzanne Edwards; Stuart Millar; Dominic Thewlis; Mark Rickman
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mitchell Ng; Nihar S Shah; Ivan Golub; Matthew Ciminero; Kevin Zhai; Kevin K Kang; Ahmed K Emara; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-10-19

4.  Trochanteric fixation nail advanced with helical blade and cement augmentation: early experience with a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-17

5.  Hip Fractures: Relevant Anatomy, Classification, and Biomechanics of Fracture and Fixation.

Authors:  Young Lu; Harmeeth S Uppal
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-03

6.  Helical blade compression failure occurred during PFNA implantation: A rare case and ingenious solution.

Authors:  Chaoqun Wang; Qingxian Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Revision of a blade cut-out in PFN-A fixation: Blade exchange, cement augmentation and a cement plug as a successful salvage option.

Authors:  M S Hanke; N A Beckmann; M J B Keel; K A Siebenrock; J D Bastian
Journal:  Trauma Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 8.  A rare complication of pelvic perforation by an excessive medial slide of the helical blade after treatment of an intertrochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Xiao-Kun Chen; Jian Xiong; Yi-Jun Liu; Quan Han; Tian-Bing Wang; Dian-Ying Zhang
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-12

9.  Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation II (PFNA II): technical note and cases series.

Authors:  Kuen-Ting Wu; Shih-Jie Lin; Ying-Chao Chou; Hsiang-Hen Cheng; Po-Chong Wen; Che-Han Lin; Wen-Ling Yeh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.