| Literature DB >> 30034926 |
Karthikram Raghuram1, Aditya Durgam1, Stephen Sartin1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Skull base venous anatomy. AIMS: While prior studies have focused on the efficacy of conventional fluoroscopic venography and multidetector computed tomography venography to evaluate the inferior petrosal sinus (IPS) before image-guided intervention (such as dural venous sinus sampling), we believe that routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide reliable structural information helpful for planning without the need for further imaging. SETTINGS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Brain; dural venous sinuses; inferior petrosal sinus; magnetic resonance imaging; skull base; veins
Year: 2018 PMID: 30034926 PMCID: PMC6029007 DOI: 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_1_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Imaging Sci ISSN: 2156-5597
Figure 1Grading system used for the transverse and sigmoid sinuses, to assess correlation with ipsilateral inferior petrosal sinus grade.
Patient demographics (n=74)
Results of analysis
Figure 2Typical (left) and atypical (right) drainage patterns of the inferior petrosal sinus. (A) Inferior petrosal sinus. (B) Cavernous sinus. (C) Superior petrosal sinus. (D) Transverse sinus. (E) Sigmoid sinus. (F) Jugular bulb. (G) Internal jugular vein. FM: Foramen magnum.
Figure 3Appearance of a grade 2 (fully visualized) right inferior petrosal sinus with drainage pattern of type A in the same patient on both contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (left) and computed tomography venography (right).
Figure 4Asymmetrical bilateral inferior petrosal sinuses as they course from the cavernous sinus to the skull base (A through F). The right inferior petrosal sinus demonstrates type A drainage, while the left inferior petrosal sinus demonstrates type B drainage. Frames D and E show the left inferior petrosal sinus (blue arrow) passing through the bony clivus (red arrow) rather than draining directly into the jugular bulb