Literature DB >> 30033695

Comparison of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment system versus the Prehospital Advanced Triage Model in multiple-casualty events.

Mariana Ferrandini Price1, Pedro Arcos González2, Manuel Pardo Ríos1, Antonio Nieto Fernández-Pacheco1, Tatiana Cuartas Álvarez3, Rafael Castro Delgado3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: . The main purpose of this simulation of a multiple-casualty event was to compare the performance of 2 triage methods: the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) system and the Prehospital Advanced Triage Model (META in its Spanish acronym). The secondary objectives were to analyze times, order of evacuations, and appropriateness of treatments.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cluster randomized trial that included 16 groups assigned to use either the START system or the META for managing casualties in a simulated event (an airline crash). Each group had 4 members. We recorded times, order of evacuation, and appropriateness of treatment.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) evacuation time was 48 minutes and 39 seconds (15 minutes, 52 seconds) in the START arm and 48 minutes and 4 seconds (17 minutes, 21 seconds) in the META arm (P=.829). The patients with greatest need of immediate care were evacuated more quickly in the META arm (31 minutes and 36 seconds [8 minutes, 27 seconds]) than in the START arm (41 minutes and 6 seconds [10 minutes, 39 seconds]) (P=.024). Evacuation of the subgroup of patients requiring emergency surgery was also faster in the META arm (24 minutes and 12 seconds [4 minutes] than in the START arm (44 minutes and 49 seconds [8 minutes, 36 seconds]) (P=.001). Analysis of the order of evacuation under the 2 triage systems revealed that 14 of the first 19 patients evacuated required immediate medical care and 5 of the first 14 evacuated required priority surgical treatment in the START arm. In the META arm, all of the first 14 patients evacuated required immediate medical care and 5 of the first 7 patients evacuated required priority surgical treatment. The rate of appropriate treatment was 92% in the META arm and 63% in the START arm (P=.023).
CONCLUSION: Use of the META system might improve prehospital times and the order of evacuation of patients, particularly patients who need immediate medical care or urgent surgery. The META might also increase the likelihood of appropriate treatment in multiple-casualty events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Desastres; Disasters; Emergency health care; Incidentes múltiples víctimas; Multiple-casualty incidents; Servicios de emergencias médicas; Simulación; Training simulations; Triage; Triaje

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30033695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emergencias        ISSN: 1137-6821            Impact factor:   3.881


  3 in total

1.  Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.

Authors:  Rodolfo Romero Pareja; Rafael Castro Delgado; Fernando Turégano Fuentes; Israel Jhon Thissard-Vasallo; David Sanz Rosa; Pedro Arcos González
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  A Multicenter Observational Prospective Cohort Study of Association of the Prehospital National Early Warning Score 2 and Hospital Triage with Early Mortality.

Authors:  Francisco Martín-Rodríguez; Raúl López-Izquierdo; Carlos Del Pozo Vegas; Juan F Delgado-Benito; Carmen Del Pozo Pérez; Virginia Carbajosa Rodríguez; Agustín Mayo Iscar; José Luis Martín-Conty; Carlos Escudero Cuadrillero; Miguel A Castro-Villamor
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.112

3.  Use of the Braden Scale to Predict Injury Severity in Mass Burn Casualties.

Authors:  Zhikang Zhu; Bin Xu; Jiaming Shao; Shuangshuang Wang; Ronghua Jin; Tingting Weng; Sizhan Xia; Wei Zhang; Min Yang; Chunmao Han; Xingang Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-02-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.