Literature DB >> 30033570

Evaluating the analytical performance of five new coagulation assays for the measurement of prothrombin time and activated thromboplastin time.

Steve Kitchen1, Ulrich Geisen2, Janos Kappelmayer3, Peter Quehenberger4, Julia Drieß2, Anna Lowe1, Robert Jones1, Jana G Boehm5, Gabrielle Miles6, Gergely Rozsnyai7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: New methods for coagulation tests require careful assessment before routine use. We evaluated the analytical performance of five new coagulation assays for measuring prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT).
METHODS: PT Rec, PT Owren, aPTT, aPTT Lupus and aPTT Screen assays (Roche Diagnostics) were evaluated on cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers (Roche Diagnostics) at four European centres. Analytical performance and method comparisons with relevant commercially available assays were performed to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines using residual anonymized samples. Lot-to-lot comparison and equivalency of the cobas t analysers were also assessed; reference ranges were determined using samples from apparently healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: Overall, coefficients of variation were ≤1.3% for within-run precision and ≤6.3% for total reproducibility across all sites. Deming regression analyses showed good agreement between each assay (cobas t 711) and respective comparator method (Pearson's r: 0.964-0.999, n > 120 samples/assay/site). Passing-Bablok regression analyses demonstrated equivalence of the two cobas t platforms for use with each assay (Pearson's r ≥ 0.995). Lot-to-lot consistency was high for all assays and comparisons (Pearson's r ≥ 0.998). Reference ranges (2.5th-97.5th percentiles; n = 200 samples/assay) in seconds were 8.4-10.6 (PT Rec), 18.2-27.2 (PT Owren), 23.6-30.6 (aPTT), 24.1-31.7 (aPTT Lupus) and 23.9-33.2 (aPTT Screen).
CONCLUSION: Based on the excellent analytical performance and good agreement with relevant comparator methods, the five coagulation assays on the novel cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 analysers are suitable for routine use in core laboratories.
© 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activated partial thromboplastin time; coagulation analyser; prothrombin time

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30033570     DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


  6 in total

1.  Monitoring of different factor VIII replacement products using a factor VIII one-stage clotting assay on cobas t 511/711 analysers.

Authors:  Carolin Ketteler; Ingrid Hoffmann; Simon Davidson; Andreas Tiede; Nina Richter
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.263

2.  High Incidence of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Lymphoma and a Proposed aPL Predictive Score.

Authors:  Smith Kungwankiattichai; Yupa Nakkinkun; Weerapat Owattanapanich; Theera Ruchutrakool
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

3.  Assessment and establishment of a reference interval for Roche Cobas t 711 coagulation analyzer for a hospital in China.

Authors:  Chi Zhu; Lili Sun; Haowei Li; Zhenghua Dong; Siyuan Yu; Xiaoming Zhao; Ji Yang; Wenjuan Wu
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2022-02-17

4.  Comparison of Intravenous versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Nondeformity Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhencheng Xiong; Junyuan Liu; Ping Yi; Hao Wang; Mingsheng Tan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Performance of 6 routine coagulation assays on the new Roche Cobas t711 analyzer.

Authors:  Marlies Oostendorp; Roefke L Noorman; J Dinant Nijenhuis; Jacques B de Kok
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2019-11-09

6.  System performance evaluation of the cobas t 711 and cobas t 511 coagulation analyzers in routine laboratory settings.

Authors:  Steve Kitchen; Moniek de Maat; Michael Nagler; Robert Jones; Anna Lowe; John Burden; Kai Groneberg; Gergely Rozsnyai
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.061

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.