Literature DB >> 30033332

Arctic Geese Tune Migration to a Warming Climate but Still Suffer from a Phenological Mismatch.

Thomas K Lameris1, Henk P van der Jeugd2, Götz Eichhorn2, Adriaan M Dokter3, Willem Bouten4, Michiel P Boom2, Konstantin E Litvin5, Bruno J Ens6, Bart A Nolet7.   

Abstract

Climate warming challenges animals to advance their timing of reproduction [1], but many animals appear to be unable to advance at the same rate as their food species [2, 3]. As a result, mismatches can arise between the moment of largest food requirements for their offspring and peak food availability [4-6], with important fitness consequences [7]. For long-distance migrants, adjustment of phenology to climate warming may be hampered by their inability to predict the optimal timing of arrival at the breeding grounds from their wintering grounds [8]. Arrival can be advanced if birds accelerate migration by reducing time on stopover sites [9, 10], but a recent study suggests that most long-distance migrants are on too tight a schedule to do so [11]. This may be different for capital-breeding migrants, which use stopovers not only to fuel migration but also to acquire body stores needed for reproduction [12-14]. By combining multiple years of tracking and reproduction data, we show that a long-distance migratory bird (the barnacle goose, Branta leucopsis) accelerates its 3,000 km spring migration to advance arrival on its rapidly warming Arctic breeding grounds. As egg laying has advanced much less than arrival, they still encounter a phenological mismatch that reduces offspring survival. A shift toward using more local resources for reproduction suggests that geese first need to refuel body stores at the breeding grounds after accelerated migration. Although flexibility in body store use allows migrants to accelerate migration, this cannot solve the time constraint they are facing under climate warming.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GPS tracking; barnacle goose; capital breeding; chick survival; long-distance migration; snow melt

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30033332     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  13 in total

Review 1.  Strengthening the evidence base for temperature-mediated phenological asynchrony and its impacts.

Authors:  Jelmer M Samplonius; Angus Atkinson; Christopher Hassall; Katharine Keogan; Stephen J Thackeray; Jakob J Assmann; Malcolm D Burgess; Jacob Johansson; Kirsty H Macphie; James W Pearce-Higgins; Emily G Simmonds; Øystein Varpe; Jamie C Weir; Dylan Z Childs; Ella F Cole; Francis Daunt; Tom Hart; Owen T Lewis; Nathalie Pettorelli; Ben C Sheldon; Albert B Phillimore
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Temperature change is an important departure cue in nocturnal migrants: controlled experiments with wild-caught birds in a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Thomas Klinner; Heiko Schmaljohann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Stochastic simulations reveal few green wave surfing populations among spring migrating herbivorous waterfowl.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Lei Cao; Anthony D Fox; Richard Fuller; Larry Griffin; Carl Mitchell; Yunlin Zhao; Oun-Kyong Moon; David Cabot; Zhenggang Xu; Nyambayar Batbayar; Andrea Kölzsch; Henk P van der Jeugd; Jesper Madsen; Liding Chen; Ran Nathan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  Ontogenetic niche shifts as a driver of seasonal migration.

Authors:  Wimke Fokkema; Henk P van der Jeugd; Thomas K Lameris; Adriaan M Dokter; Barwolt S Ebbinge; André M de Roos; Bart A Nolet; Theunis Piersma; Han Olff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Temporal changes in reproductive success and optimal breeding decisions in a long-distance migratory bird.

Authors:  Cynthia Reséndiz-Infante; Gilles Gauthier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Exploring the drivers of variation in trophic mismatches: A systematic review of long-term avian studies.

Authors:  Mikhail K Zhemchuzhnikov; Tom S L Versluijs; Thomas K Lameris; Jeroen Reneerkens; Christiaan Both; Jan A van Gils
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Nocturnal foraging lifts time constraints in winter for migratory geese but hardly speeds up fueling.

Authors:  Thomas K Lameris; Adriaan M Dokter; Henk P van der Jeugd; Willem Bouten; Jasper Koster; Stefan H H Sand; Coen Westerduin; Bart A Nolet
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.671

8.  Migration distance affects how closely Eurasian wigeons follow spring phenology during migration.

Authors:  Mariëlle L van Toor; Sergey Kharitonov; Saulius Švažas; Mindaugas Dagys; Erik Kleyheeg; Gerard Müskens; Ulf Ottosson; Ramunas Žydelis; Jonas Waldenström
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.600

9.  Climate warming may affect the optimal timing of reproduction for migratory geese differently in the low and high Arctic.

Authors:  Thomas K Lameris; Margje E de Jong; Michiel P Boom; Henk P van der Jeugd; Konstantin E Litvin; Maarten J J E Loonen; Bart A Nolet; Jouke Prop
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  From individual to population level: Temperature and snow cover modulate fledging success through breeding phenology in greylag geese (Anser anser).

Authors:  Didone Frigerio; Petra Sumasgutner; Kurt Kotrschal; Sonia Kleindorfer; Josef Hemetsberger
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.