Literature DB >> 30033256

Biosilica incorporated 3D porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications.

Sedef Tamburaci1, Funda Tihminlioglu2.   

Abstract

As a natural and abundant silica mineral, diatomite particles (SiO2-nH2O) have been used in several areas such as filtration, photonics, sound and heat insulation, filler material and drug delivery due to its abundance, inexpensive cost, unique morphology and porous structure. But up to date, diatomite incorporated silica based scaffolds have not been used for bone tissue engineering applications. In the present study, the goal was to combine the useful biomaterial properties of both chitosan and diatomite as biocomposite organic/inorganic biomaterial for bone tissue engineering applications and optimize the silica content of the composites in order to obtain optimum morphological structure, high mechanical properties, enlarged surface area and enhanced cell proliferation. The effect of silica loading on the mechanical, morphological, chemical, and surface properties, wettability and biocompatibility of composite scaffolds were investigated. In addition, in vitro cytotoxicity and cellular activities including cell proliferation, ALP activity and biomineralization were investigated in order to determine biological activity of the composite scaffolds. Diatomite particles lead to enhancement in the water uptake capacity of scaffolds. Chitosan-silica composites exhibited 82-90% porosity. Wet chitosan-silica composite scaffolds exhibited higher compression moduli when compared to pure chitosan scaffold in the range of 67.3-90.1 kPa. Average pore size range of chitosan-diatomite composite scaffolds was obtained as 218-319 μm. In vitro results indicated that chitosan-diatomite composites did not show any cytotoxic effect on 3T3, MG-63 and Saos-2 cell lines. Scaffolds were found to be favorable for osteoblast proliferation. Diatomite incorporation showed promising effects on enhancing ALP activity as well as mineral formation on scaffold surface. Thus, the prepared scaffolds in this study can be considered prospective material for bone tissue engineering applications.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Chitosan; Diatomite; Scaffold; Silica

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30033256     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.05.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  8 in total

1.  Gaseous sulfur trioxide induced controllable sulfonation promoting biomineralization and osseointegration of polyetheretherketone implants.

Authors:  Teng Wan; Zixue Jiao; Min Guo; Zongliang Wang; Yizao Wan; Kaili Lin; Qinyi Liu; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2020-07-04

2.  Additive Manufactured Poly(ε-caprolactone)-graphene Scaffolds: Lamellar Crystal Orientation, Mechanical Properties and Biological Performance.

Authors:  Sara Biscaia; João C Silva; Carla Moura; Tânia Viana; Ana Tojeira; Geoffrey R Mitchell; Paula Pascoal-Faria; Frederico Castelo Ferreira; Nuno Alves
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  Small Molecules Enhance Scaffold-Based Bone Grafts via Purinergic Receptor Signaling in Stem Cells.

Authors:  Patrick Frank Ottensmeyer; Markus Witzler; Margit Schulze; Edda Tobiasch
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Effect of the nano/microscale structure of biomaterial scaffolds on bone regeneration.

Authors:  Lisha Zhu; Dan Luo; Yan Liu
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 6.344

5.  Bacterial Polyglucuronic Acid/Alginate/Carbon Nanofibers Hydrogel Nanocomposite as a Potential Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Zahra Ebrahimvand Dibazar; Mahnaz Mohammadpour; Hadi Samadian; Soheila Zare; Mehdi Azizi; Masoud Hamidi; Redouan Elboutachfaiti; Emmanuel Petit; Cédric Delattre
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  3D Printing of Diatomite Incorporated Composite Scaffolds for Skin Repair of Deep Burn Wounds.

Authors:  Jingge Ma; Jinfu Wu; Hongjian Zhang; Lin Du; Hui Zhuang; Zhaowenbin Zhang; Bing Ma; Jiang Chang; Chengtie Wu
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2022-06-11

Review 7.  Biomimetic chitosan with biocomposite nanomaterials for bone tissue repair and regeneration.

Authors:  Se-Kwon Kim; Sesha Subramanian Murugan; Pandurang Appana Dalavi; Sebanti Gupta; Sukumaran Anil; Gi Hun Seong; Jayachandran Venkatesan
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 3.272

8.  Ether-Oxygen Containing Electrospun Microfibrous and Sub-Microfibrous Scaffolds Based on Poly(butylene 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate) for Skeletal Muscle Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Nora Bloise; Emanuele Berardi; Chiara Gualandi; Elisa Zaghi; Matteo Gigli; Robin Duelen; Gabriele Ceccarelli; Emanuela Elsa Cortesi; Domiziana Costamagna; Giovanna Bruni; Nadia Lotti; Maria Letizia Focarete; Livia Visai; Maurilio Sampaolesi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.