| Literature DB >> 30033000 |
Vera M Ripoll1, Francesca Pregnolato2, Simona Mazza3, Caterina Bodio2, Claudia Grossi2, Thomas McDonnell3, Charis Pericleous3, Pier Luigi Meroni2, David A Isenberg3, Anisur Rahman3, Ian P Giles3.
Abstract
Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) cause vascular thrombosis (VT) and/or pregnancy morbidity (PM). Differential mechanisms however, underlying the pathogenesis of these different manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) are not fully understood. Therefore, we compared the effects of aPL from patients with thrombotic or obstetric APS on monocytes to identify different molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of APS subtypes. VT or PM IgG induced similar numbers of differentially expressed (DE) genes in monocytes. However, gene ontology (GO) analysis of DE genes revealed disease-specific genome signatures. Compared to PM, VT-IgG showed specific up regulation of genes associated with cell response to stress, regulation of MAPK signalling pathway and cell communication. In contrast, PM-IgG regulated genes involved in cell adhesion, extracellular matrix and embryonic and skeletal development. A novel gene expression analysis based on differential variability (DV) was also applied. This analysis identified similar GO categories compared to DE analysis but also uncovered novel pathways modulated solely by PM or VT-IgG. Gene expression analysis distinguished a differential effect of VT or PM-IgG upon monocytes supporting the hypothesis that they trigger distinctive physiological mechanisms. This finding contributes to our understanding of the pathology of APS and may lead to the development of different targeted therapies for VT or PM APS.Entities:
Keywords: APS; Gene expression profiling; Monocytes; Pregnancy morbidity; Vascular thrombosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30033000 PMCID: PMC6123515 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Autoimmun ISSN: 0896-8411 Impact factor: 7.094
Clinical and laboratory features of patients and controls.
| Vascular Thrombosis (VT) (n = 9) | Pregnancy Morbidity (PM) (n = 9) | Healthy controls (HC) (n = 9) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Mean ± SEM) | 45.6 ± 4.9 | 39.7 ± 2.5 | 39.2 ± 5.0 |
| Sex | 6 F/3 M | 9 F | 6 F/3M |
| PAPS | 7 (77.7%) | 8 (88.8%) | 0 |
| SLE | 2 (22.2%) | 1 (11.1%) | 0 |
| Live births | 6 | 12 | 7 |
| Total APS-related PM | 0 | 9 (2FT-PL,7ST-PL) | 0 |
| Vascular thrombosis | 6 V, 6A, 3R | 0 | 0 |
| Serum LA-positive | 7 | 8 | NT |
| Serum aCL (Mean GPLU ± SEM) | 160.6 ± 30.2 | 128.4 ± 17.3 | 7.7 ± 0.2 |
| Serum anti-b2GPI (Mean GBU ± SEM) | 68.6 ± 22.5 | 51.3 ± 18.8 | 3.9 ± 1.1 |
| IgG aCL (Mean GPLU ± SEM) | 84.0 ± 15.6 | 67.5 ± 19.3 | 5.9 ± 0.6 |
| IgG anti-b2GPI (Mean GBU ± SEM) | 39.1.±9.9 | 40.6 ± 13.2 | 4.8 ± 1.1 |
| Other autoantibodies | anti-dsDNA 3, ANA 3 | anti-dsDNA 1, ANA 1 | 0 |
| Medication | OA 6, CS 1, IS 2 | LDA 2, HCQ 1 | 0 |
Abbreviations: aCL, anti-cardiolipin antibodies; anti-β2GPI, anti-β2-glycoprotein-I antibodies; A, arterial; ANA, antinuclear antibodies; CS, corticosteroid; F, female; GPLU, IgG phospholipid units; GBU, IgG arbitrary units; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; IS, Immunosuppressant; LDA, low dose aspirin; LA, lupus anticoagulant; M, male; NT, not tested; OA, oral anticoagulant; PAPS, primary antiphospholipid syndrome; PM, pregnancy morbidity; R, recurrent; SEM, standard error of the mean; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; ST-PL, second trimester pregnancy loss; TT-PL, third trimester pregnancy loss; V venous.
Fig. 1Microarray analysis of human monocytes treated with VT+/PM-, VT-/PM + or HC-IgG. (A) Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of gene expression data. Treatments are shown by different colours and labels. T1-T7, T13 (red): VT+/PM-IgG; O8-O12, O14: VT-/PM+ IgG (blue); N15-N22 (green): HC- IgG. (B) Hierarchical clustering analysis of the DE probes in monocytes treated with VT+/PM-, VT-/PM+ or HC-IgG. Heat map of genes differentially expressed across the treatments. Each horizontal line represents a single transcript. Red and green denote high and low expression respectively. Dendrograms represent similarity of gene expression profile in the rows and treatments in the columns. (C) IgG from patients with VT+/PM-, VT-/PM+ differentially regulate gene expression in monocytes. Venn diagram illustrating the number of commonly and solely regulated genes in monocytes treated with VT+/PM-, VT-/PM+ or HC-IgG. The number of DE genes significantly regulated in monocytes treated with VT+/PM-, VT-/PM+ IgG is shown (D). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2Hierarchical clustering analysis of representative GO categories associated with VT+/PM-, VT-/PM+ IgG. Heat map of overrepresented biological processes up-regulated and down-regulated in VT-/PM+ (A) and VT+/PM- (B) based on EASE score inferred from functional annotation clustering performed in DAVID. Red and green denote high and low expression respectively; black indicates no expression. Relative log2 fold change for 10 genes in top representative categories of up-regulated genes for VT-/PM+ (C) and VT+/PM- (D) are shown. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Validation of microarray data by quantitative real time PCR (qPCR).Ex-vivo monocytes were treated with 200 μg/mL of individual IgG samples (9 VT+/PM-, 9 VT-/PM+ or 9 HC) for 6 h and levels of mRNA measured by qPCR. VT-/PM+ (A) and VT+/PM- (B) genes targets are shown. Data points represent the fold change expression of each sample compared to untreated; mean and standard errors are displayed. Data are representative of at least three independent experiments. Statistically significant difference was determined by one-way ANOVA, p values are displayed.
Fig. 4Differential variability (DV) analysis. An illustrative example of a differentially variable gene in VT+/PM- IgG compared to VT-/PM+ and HC-IgG is shown (A). Venn diagram displays the number of genes with differential variability expression in VT+/PM- and VT-/PM+ IgG compared to HC (B). Pie chart showing the GO analysis of biological processes distribution of genes with high (C) and low (D) variance in VT-/PM+ IgG and high and low variability in VT+/PM- IgG (E, F). Percentages were calculated as proportions of total EASE score. Exploded portions of the pie highlight the most representative categories. Validation of DV genes by qPCR (G), variance for each treatment was calculate and plotted; mean, standard errors and p values are displayed.