| Literature DB >> 30032679 |
Wenjie Su1, Xiaofan Deng2, Xiangkui Li1, Jia Deng1, Peng Li1, Mengchang Yang1.
Abstract
Objectives Hepatic echinococcosis (HE) is a severe parasitic disease that occurs worldwide, and radical surgery is the recommended therapy. This study was performed to investigate the efficacy of using a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block during surgery on postoperative pain and recovery of patients with HE under the guidelines of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Methods Fifty-eight patients from the Tibetan plateau who underwent surgery for treatment of HE by the same surgeons under the guidance of ERAS were included in the present study. A TAP block was conducted before closing the abdominal cavity. Results The consumption of sufentanil was significantly lower in patients of the TAP than control group. Patients had a significantly shorter time to first flatus in the TAP than control group. Other parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups. Conclusions Use of the TAP block could reduce the consumption of analgesic medication and promote recovery of patients from the Tibetan plateau under the guidance of an ERAS protocol.Entities:
Keywords: Transversus abdominis plane block; analgesia; enhanced recovery after surgery; hepatic echinococcosis; postoperative pain; sufentanil
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30032679 PMCID: PMC6136007 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518775292
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Demographic characteristics and surgical parameters in the two groups.
| Characteristics | TAP group (n = 29) | Control group (n = 29) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 47 ± 7.6 | 45 ± 8.5 | 0.367 |
| Men/women | 10/19 | 13/16 | 0.421 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.4 ± 4.1 | 26.5 ± 5.0 | 0.389 |
| Weight (kg) | 55 ± 7.1 | 53 ± 9.4 | 0.661 |
| ASA status | 0.597 | ||
| I/II | 12/17 | 14/15 | |
| Before surgery | |||
| MAP (mm/Hg) | 59 ± 24.5 | 56 ± 28.9 | 0.454 |
| HR (beats/min) | 55 ± 7.5 | 57 ± 6.9 | 0.768 |
| Duration of surgery (min) | 271 ± 73 | 269 ± 85 | 0.327 |
| During surgery | |||
| Urine volume (mL) | 654 ± 241 | 594 ± 340 | 0.157 |
| Transfusion volume (mL) | 1780 ± 650 | 1850 ± 710 | 0.382 |
| Amount of bleeding (mL) | 328 ± 177 | 287 ± 168 | 0.286 |
| At the end of surgery | |||
| MAP (mm/Hg) | 62 ± 28.8 | 59 ± 32.4 | 0.428 |
| HR (beats/min) | 64 ± 7.2 | 69 ± 10.1 | 0.674 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients. TAP, transversus abdominis plane; BMI, body mass index; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate.
Postoperative data in the two groups.
| Characteristics | TAP group (n = 29) | Control group (n = 29) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time of ambulation (h) | 11 ± 5.6 | 12 ± 6.8 | 0.23 |
| Time to first flatus (h) | 15 ± 6.1 | 19 ± 7.4 | 0.03 |
| Complications | |||
| Nausea | 2 | 6 | 0.253 |
| Vomiting | 1 | 3 | 0.604 |
| 48 h after surgery | |||
| VAS score | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.5 | 0.45 |
| MAP (mm/Hg) | 65 ± 19.5 | 61 ± 25.5 | 0.505 |
| HR (beats/min) | 56 ± 10.5 | 58 ± 9.4 | 0.448 |
| Length of hospital stay (days) | 9 ± 3.7 | 9 ± 4.5 | 0.37 |
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number of patients. MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; VAS, visual analog scale.
Figure 1.(a) MAP and (b) HR between the two groups before and after surgery. 0–24 h indicates the postoperative time. MAP, mean arterial pressure; HR, heart rate; TAP, transversus abdominis plane.