Literature DB >> 30032106

Recent insights into decision-making and their implications for informed consent.

Irene M L Vos1, Maartje H N Schermer1, Ineke L L E Bolt1.   

Abstract

Research from behavioural sciences shows that people reach decisions in a much less rational and well-considered way than was often assumed. The doctrine of informed consent, which is an important ethical principle and legal requirement in medical practice, is being challenged by these insights into decision-making and real-world choice behaviour. This article discusses the implications of recent insights of research on decision-making behaviour for the informed consent doctrine. It concludes that there is a significant tension between the often non-rational choice behaviour and the traditional theory of informed consent. Responsible ways of dealing with or solving these problems are considered. To this end, patient decisions aids (PDAs) are discussed as suitable interventions to support autonomous decision-making. However, current PDAs demand certain improvements in order to protect and promote autonomous decision-making. Based on a conception of autonomy, we will argue which type of improvements are needed. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autonomy; decision-making; informed consent; psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30032106     DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2018-104884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Quality of Informed Consent Practices around the Time of Childbirth: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy.

Authors:  Emanuelle Pessa Valente; Ilaria Mariani; Benedetta Covi; Marzia Lazzerini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  (Re)Conceptualising 'good' proxy decision-making for research: the implications for proxy consent decision quality.

Authors:  Victoria Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.834

Review 3.  Conducting epigenetics research with refugees and asylum seekers: attending to the ethical challenges.

Authors:  Faten Taki; Inmaculada de Melo-Martin
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 6.551

4.  "It means so much for me to have a choice": a qualitative study providing first-person perspectives on medication-free treatment in mental health care.

Authors:  Christine H Oedegaard; Larry Davidson; Brynjulf Stige; Marius Veseth; Anne Blindheim; Linda Garvik; Jan-Magne Sørensen; Øystein Søraa; Ingunn Marie Stadskleiv Engebretsen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 3.630

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.