Literature DB >> 30032063

Models of lineup memory.

John T Wixted1, Edward Vul2, Laura Mickes3, Brent M Wilson2.   

Abstract

Face recognition memory is often tested by the police using a photo lineup, which consists of one suspect, who is either innocent or guilty, and five or more physically similar fillers, all of whom are known to be innocent. For many years, lineups were investigated in lab studies without guidance from standard models of recognition memory. More recently, signal detection theory has been used to conceptualize lineup memory and to motivate receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of lineup performance. Here, we describe three competing signal-detection models of lineup memory, derive their likelihood functions, and fit them to empirical ROC data. We also introduce the notion that memory signals generated by the faces in a lineup are likely to be correlated because, by design, those faces share features. The models we investigate differ in their predictions about the effect that correlated memory signals should have on the ability to discriminate innocent from guilty suspects. A popular compound signal detection model known as the Integration model predicts that correlated memory signals should impair discriminability. Empirically, this model performed so poorly that, going forward, it should probably be abandoned. The best-fitting model incorporates a principle known as "ensemble coding," which predicts that correlated memory signals should enhance discriminability. The ensemble model aligns with a previously proposed theory of eyewitness identification according to which the simultaneous presentation of faces in a lineup enhances discriminability compared to when faces are presented in isolation because it permits eyewitnesses to detect and discount non-diagnostic facial features.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Confidence and accuracy; Eyewitness memory; Lineups; ROC analysis; Showups; Signal-detection theory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30032063     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  7 in total

1.  Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups.

Authors:  David Kellen; Ryan M McAdoo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-07-22

2.  Lineup identification in young and older witnesses: does describing the criminal help or hinder?

Authors:  Juliet S Holdstock; Polly Dalton; Keith A May; Stewart Boogert; Laura Mickes
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Jeffrey J Starns; Caren M Rotello; Andrea M Cataldo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-05-13

4.  Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators.

Authors:  Curt A Carlson; Jacob A Hemby; Alex R Wooten; Alyssa R Jones; Robert F Lockamyeir; Maria A Carlson; Jennifer L Dias; Jane E Whittington
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-03-03

5.  Child witness expressions of certainty are informative.

Authors:  Alice A Winsor; Heather D Flowe; Travis M Seale-Carlisle; Isabella M Killeen; Danielle Hett; Theo Jores; Madeleine Ingham; Byron P Lee; Laura M Stevens; Melissa F Colloff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-09-09

6.  The impact of sleep on eyewitness identifications.

Authors:  D P Morgan; J Tamminen; T M Seale-Carlisle; L Mickes
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Authors:  Matthew Kaesler; John C Dunn; Keith Ransom; Carolyn Semmler
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.