Literature DB >> 30031844

Classification of Ventricular Septal Defects for the Eleventh Iteration of the International Classification of Diseases-Striving for Consensus: A Report From the International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease.

Leo Lopez1, Lucile Houyel2, Steven D Colan3, Robert H Anderson4, Marie J Béland5, Vera D Aiello6, Frederique Bailliard7, Meryl S Cohen8, Jeffrey P Jacobs9, Hiromi Kurosawa10, Stephen P Sanders3, Henry L Walters11, Paul M Weinberg8, Jeffrey R Boris8, Andrew C Cook12, Adrian Crucean13, Allen D Everett14, J William Gaynor8, Jorge Giroud9, Kristine J Guleserian15, Marina L Hughes16, Amy L Juraszek17, Otto N Krogmann18, Bohdan J Maruszewski19, James D St Louis20, Stephen P Seslar21, Diane E Spicer22, Shubhika Srivastava23, Giovanni Stellin24, Christo I Tchervenkov25, Lianyi Wang26, Rodney C G Franklin27.   

Abstract

The definition and classification of ventricular septal defects have been fraught with controversy. The International Society for Nomenclature of Paediatric and Congenital Heart Disease is a group of international specialists in pediatric cardiology, cardiac surgery, cardiac morphology, and cardiac pathology that has met annually for the past 9 years in an effort to unify by consensus the divergent approaches to describe ventricular septal defects. These efforts have culminated in acceptance of the classification system by the World Health Organization into the 11th Iteration of the International Classification of Diseases. The scheme to categorize a ventricular septal defect uses both its location and the structures along its borders, thereby bridging the two most popular and disparate classification approaches and providing a common language for describing each phenotype. Although the first-order terms are based on the geographic categories of central perimembranous, inlet, trabecular muscular, and outlet defects, inlet and outlet defects are further characterized by descriptors that incorporate the borders of the defect, namely the perimembranous, muscular, and juxta-arterial types. The Society recognizes that it is equally valid to classify these defects by geography or borders, so the emphasis in this system is on the second-order terms that incorporate both geography and borders to describe each phenotype. The unified terminology should help the medical community describe with better precision all types of ventricular septal defects.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30031844     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Spontaneous closure of an isolated congenital perimembranous ventricular septal defect in two dogs.

Authors:  Anne van de Watering; Viktor Szatmári
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.741

2.  Assessing the criteria for definition of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in light of the search for consensus.

Authors:  Justin T Tretter; Vi-Hue Tran; Seth Gray; Hieu Ta; Rohit S Loomba; William O'Connor; Diane E Spicer; Andrew C Cook; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  EDUCATIONAL SERIES IN CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE: Echocardiographic assessment of transposition of the great arteries and congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries

Authors:  Meryl S Cohen; Luc L Mertens
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-01

4.  Better communication between experts is needed to solve the environmental origins of birth defects.

Authors:  Duncan B Sparrow
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.653

5.  Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries: is it really a transposition? An anatomical study of the right ventricular septal surface.

Authors:  Nicolas Arribard; Meriem Mostefa Kara; Sébastien Hascoët; Bettina Bessières; Damien Bonnet; Lucile Houyel
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Development of the human heart.

Authors:  Marieke F J Buijtendijk; Phil Barnett; Maurice J B van den Hoff
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 7.  The Role of Epigenetics in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Tingsen Benson Lim; Sik Yin Roger Foo; Ching Kit Chen
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.096

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.