| Literature DB >> 30031391 |
Mikito Mori1, Keiji Koda2, Atsushi Hirano1, Kiyohiko Shuto1, Chihiro Kosugi1, Kazuo Narushima1, Isamu Hosokawa1, Takayuki Suzuki1, Masato Yamazaki1, Hiroaki Shimizu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical findings of early anal gland carcinoma (AGC) have not been well delineated because AGC is a rare malignancy usually diagnosed at an advanced stage. Knowledge of the characteristic findings will be helpful for both diagnosis and determination of the treatment options for early AGC. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Anal cancer; Anal gland carcinoma; Anal mucinous adenocarcinoma; Case report; Early anal canal cancer
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30031391 PMCID: PMC6054852 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1451-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Fig. 1Lower gastrointestinal endoscopy findings. A submucosal tumor-like region was seen on the right anterior wall of the rectum. The tumor had no mucosal defects, and its surface was normal
Fig. 2Abdominal (a) computed tomography images, b T1-weighted magnetic resonance images, and (c) T2-weighed magnetic resonance images prior to the first operation. A submucosal cystic lesion without enhancement of the capsule was seen on the right side of the lower rectal wall. It contained homogeneous fluid with calcification of the capsule. d A similar tumor was detected by computed tomography 14 months after the first operation
Fig. 3Histopathological findings of the resected specimen at (a–c) the first operation and (d–f) the second operation. a Retention of yellow jelly-like mucus in the cavity. b, c High-grade adenoma with mucin production. d The capsule containing the mucus. e, f Mucinous adenocarcinoma limited to the anal gland [hematoxylin and eosin staining at (a, d) × 20, (B, E) × 40, and (c, f) × 100. Arrows in B and E indicate areas shown in C, F, respectively]
Fig. 4Histopathological findings of intersphincteric resection with partial external sphincter resection [hematoxylin and eosin staining at (a) × 20, (b) × 40, and (c) × 100 magnification]. The tumor was limited to the anal gland and did not invade deeper areas
Fig. 5Immunohistochemical analysis showing that the tumor cells were (a) positive for cytokeratin 7 (× 100 magnification) and (b) negative for cytokeratin 20 (× 100 magnification)