Nexhmedin Morina1, Kimberly Stam2, Thomas V Pollet3, Stefan Priebe4. 1. Institute of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: morina@uni-muenster.de. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 4. Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological surveys on depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among civilian war survivors in war-afflicted regions have produced heterogeneous prevalence estimates of these conditions. METHODS: To determine the prevalence of both depression and PTSD in civilian war survivors in the area of conflict, we conducted a systematic search of Medline, PsycInfo, and Pilots databases. We included epidemiological studies that had used structured clinical interviews. We conducted random effects meta-analyses on prevalence proportions as well as univariate mixed model meta-regressions. RESULTS: We included 33 studies that assessed prevalences of depression (k = 18) and/or PTSD (k = 30). Across all studies, pooled point prevalences of 0.27 and 0.26 were found for depression and PTSD, respectively. Ten percent of participants fulfilled criteria for both disorders. Surveys with a higher mean age of participants reported higher prevalence of depression. Furthermore, samples with higher rates of unemployment and higher percentages of women reported higher prevalence of PTSD, whereas samples with a higher number of participants living with a partner reported lower prevalence of PTSD. LIMITATIONS: The findings are limited by poor psychometric reporting practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both depression and PTSD are highly prevalent in war survivors who stayed in the area of conflict. Yet, future research on this topic need to focus on psychometric properties of instruments used to assess psychopathology among war survivors. Notwithstanding this limitation, there is an urgent need for large-scale mental health programs that are appropriate for war-affected countries with limited resources and address depression as much as PTSD.
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological surveys on depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among civilian war survivors in war-afflicted regions have produced heterogeneous prevalence estimates of these conditions. METHODS: To determine the prevalence of both depression and PTSD in civilian war survivors in the area of conflict, we conducted a systematic search of Medline, PsycInfo, and Pilots databases. We included epidemiological studies that had used structured clinical interviews. We conducted random effects meta-analyses on prevalence proportions as well as univariate mixed model meta-regressions. RESULTS: We included 33 studies that assessed prevalences of depression (k = 18) and/or PTSD (k = 30). Across all studies, pooled point prevalences of 0.27 and 0.26 were found for depression and PTSD, respectively. Ten percent of participants fulfilled criteria for both disorders. Surveys with a higher mean age of participants reported higher prevalence of depression. Furthermore, samples with higher rates of unemployment and higher percentages of women reported higher prevalence of PTSD, whereas samples with a higher number of participants living with a partner reported lower prevalence of PTSD. LIMITATIONS: The findings are limited by poor psychometric reporting practices. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both depression and PTSD are highly prevalent in war survivors who stayed in the area of conflict. Yet, future research on this topic need to focus on psychometric properties of instruments used to assess psychopathology among war survivors. Notwithstanding this limitation, there is an urgent need for large-scale mental health programs that are appropriate for war-affected countries with limited resources and address depression as much as PTSD.
Authors: Jue Luo; David S Zamar; Martin D Ogwang; Herbert Muyinda; Samuel S Malamba; Achilles Katamba; Kate Jongbloed; Martin T Schechter; Nelson K Sewankambo; Patricia M Spittal Journal: J Migr Health Date: 2022-06-19
Authors: Mark Mohan Kaggwa; Sarah Maria Najjuka; Felix Bongomin; Mohammed A Mamun; Mark D Griffiths Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Lauren C Ng; Anne Stevenson; Sreeja S Kalapurakkel; Charlotte Hanlon; Soraya Seedat; Boniface Harerimana; Bonginkosi Chiliza; Karestan C Koenen Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 11.069