BACKGROUND: Epigenetic dysregulation through ethanol (EtOH)-induced changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications has been implicated in several alcohol-related disorders such as alcoholic liver disease. EtOH metabolism in the liver results in the formation of acetate, a metabolite that can be converted to acetyl-CoA, which can then be used by histone acetyltransferases to acetylate lysine residues. EtOH metabolism in the liver can also indirectly influence lysine acetylation through NAD+ -dependent sirtuin activity that is altered due to increases in NADH. As a proof-of-concept study to determine the direct influence of hepatic EtOH metabolism on histone acetylation changes, we used heavy-labeled EtOH (13 C2 ) and mass spectrometry (MS) to site specifically characterize lysine acetylation on histone proteins. METHODS: Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were gavaged using a bolus dose of either 13 C2 -labeled EtOH (5 g/kg) or maltose dextrin. Blood and livers were collected at 0, 4, and 24 hours followed by histone protein enrichment and derivatization using acid extraction and propionylation, respectively. Metabolic tracing and relative quantitation of acetylated histone proteins were performed using a hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. Data were analyzed using MaxQuant, Xcalibur Qual Browser, and the Bioconductor package "mzR." The contribution of EtOH to histone acetylation was quantified using the change in relative abundance of stable isotope incorporation in acetylated peptides detected by MS. RESULTS: Data show significant incorporation of the EtOH-derived 13 C2 -label into N-terminal lysine acetylation sites on histones H3 and H4 after 4 hours, with rapid turnover of labeled histone acetylation sites and return to endogenous levels at 24 hours postgavage. Moreover, site-specific selectivity was observed in regard to label incorporation into certain lysine acetylation sites as determined by tandem mass spectrometry and comparison to isotope simulations. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first quantitative evidence of how hepatic EtOH metabolism directly influences histone lysine acetylation in a site-specific manner and may influence EtOH-induced gene expression through these transcriptionally activating chromatin marks.
BACKGROUND: Epigenetic dysregulation through ethanol (EtOH)-induced changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications has been implicated in several alcohol-related disorders such as alcoholic liver disease. EtOH metabolism in the liver results in the formation of acetate, a metabolite that can be converted to acetyl-CoA, which can then be used by histoneacetyltransferases to acetylate lysine residues. EtOH metabolism in the liver can also indirectly influence lysineacetylation through NAD+ -dependent sirtuin activity that is altered due to increases in NADH. As a proof-of-concept study to determine the direct influence of hepatic EtOH metabolism on histoneacetylation changes, we used heavy-labeled EtOH (13 C2 ) and mass spectrometry (MS) to site specifically characterize lysineacetylation on histone proteins. METHODS: Eight-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were gavaged using a bolus dose of either 13 C2 -labeled EtOH (5 g/kg) or maltose dextrin. Blood and livers were collected at 0, 4, and 24 hours followed by histone protein enrichment and derivatization using acid extraction and propionylation, respectively. Metabolic tracing and relative quantitation of acetylated histone proteins were performed using a hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. Data were analyzed using MaxQuant, Xcalibur Qual Browser, and the Bioconductor package "mzR." The contribution of EtOH to histoneacetylation was quantified using the change in relative abundance of stable isotope incorporation in acetylated peptides detected by MS. RESULTS: Data show significant incorporation of the EtOH-derived 13 C2 -label into N-terminal lysineacetylation sites on histones H3 and H4 after 4 hours, with rapid turnover of labeled histoneacetylation sites and return to endogenous levels at 24 hours postgavage. Moreover, site-specific selectivity was observed in regard to label incorporation into certain lysineacetylation sites as determined by tandem mass spectrometry and comparison to isotope simulations. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide the first quantitative evidence of how hepatic EtOH metabolism directly influences histonelysineacetylation in a site-specific manner and may influence EtOH-induced gene expression through these transcriptionally activating chromatin marks.
Authors: Matthew C Chambers; Brendan Maclean; Robert Burke; Dario Amodei; Daniel L Ruderman; Steffen Neumann; Laurent Gatto; Bernd Fischer; Brian Pratt; Jarrett Egertson; Katherine Hoff; Darren Kessner; Natalie Tasman; Nicholas Shulman; Barbara Frewen; Tahmina A Baker; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Christopher Paulse; David Creasy; Lisa Flashner; Kian Kani; Chris Moulding; Sean L Seymour; Lydia M Nuwaysir; Brent Lefebvre; Frank Kuhlmann; Joe Roark; Paape Rainer; Suckau Detlev; Tina Hemenway; Andreas Huhmer; James Langridge; Brian Connolly; Trey Chadick; Krisztina Holly; Josh Eckels; Eric W Deutsch; Robert L Moritz; Jonathan E Katz; David B Agus; Michael MacCoss; David L Tabb; Parag Mallick Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Claire L Simpson; Robin Lemmens; Katarzyna Miskiewicz; Wendy J Broom; Valerie K Hansen; Paul W J van Vught; John E Landers; Peter Sapp; Ludo Van Den Bosch; Joanne Knight; Benjamin M Neale; Martin R Turner; Jan H Veldink; Roel A Ophoff; Vineeta B Tripathi; Ana Beleza; Meera N Shah; Petroula Proitsi; Annelies Van Hoecke; Peter Carmeliet; H Robert Horvitz; P Nigel Leigh; Christopher E Shaw; Leonard H van den Berg; Pak C Sham; John F Powell; Patrik Verstreken; Robert H Brown; Wim Robberecht; Ammar Al-Chalabi Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2008-11-07 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Peter S Harris; Cole R Michel; Youngho Yun; Courtney D McGinnis; Mohammed A Assiri; Ali Reza Ahmadi; Zhaoli Sun; James R Roede; Matthew A Burchill; David J Orlicky; Rebecca L McCullough; Kristofer S Fritz Journal: Alcohol Date: 2021-12-17 Impact factor: 2.558
Authors: P Mews; G Egervari; R Nativio; S Sidoli; G Donahue; S I Lombroso; D C Alexander; S L Riesche; E A Heller; E J Nestler; B A Garcia; S L Berger Journal: Nature Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 49.962