Literature DB >> 30030726

Urethral Catheterization of Buried Penis in Obese Patients: a Novel Technique and Literature Review.

Ibrahim Alnadhari1, Osama Abdeljaleel2, Omar Ali2, Ahmad Shamsodini2, Morshed Salah2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Urethral catheterization is a common procedure in daily medical practice and most medical staff are trained for the procedure. Buried penis in morbid obese patients with scrotal edema makes urethral catheterization challenging and sometimes fails. Different methods have been published to overcome the urethral catheterization difficulties in buried penis of obese patients.
METHODS: A 51-year-old morbidly obese male patient presented with urine retention. On inspection of his external genitalia, there was no penile shaft seen and the penis was buried within the cavity between pubic fat and severely edematous scrotum. To overcome the urethral catheterization difficulties, we used a laryngoscope which helps in visualization of the glans and external urethral meatus. The figures demonstrate the technique used.
RESULTS: Successful urethral catheterization under direct visualization was achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: The technique is well tolerated by patients and increases the overall likelihood of successful urethral catheterization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buried penis; Difficult catheterization; Obesity; Urethral catheterization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030726     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3390-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  8 in total

Review 1.  Difficult male urethral catheterization: a review of different approaches.

Authors:  Carlos Villanueva; George P Hemstreet
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Buried penis in super obesity: a technique for urethral catheterization under direct vision.

Authors:  James C Hewes; John Kelly; Majid Hashemi
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.734

3.  Urethral catheterization in anasarca.

Authors:  T B Walden
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Complications of a buried penis in an extremely obese patient.

Authors:  B Mattsson; C Vollmer; C Schwab; C Padevit; K Horton; H John; M Horstmann
Journal:  Andrologia       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 2.775

5.  Inability to pass a urethral catheter: the bedside role of the flexible cystoscope.

Authors:  M Beaghler; M Grasso; P Loisides
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 6.  A practical approach to difficult urinary catheterizations.

Authors:  Cameron Ghaffary; Amanuel Yohannes; Carlos Villanueva; Stephen W Leslie
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Results of a simplified technique for buried penis repair.

Authors:  Tara L Frenkl; Saurabh Agarwal; Anthony A Caldamone
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Management of the buried penis in adults.

Authors:  C F Donatucci; E F Ritter
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.450

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.