Literature DB >> 30030630

Deposition, removal and production site of the amorphous mating plug in the spider Philodromus cespitum.

Lenka Sentenská1, Stano Pekár2, Gabriele Uhl3.   

Abstract

In order to avoid sperm competition, males of many taxa apply physical barriers, so-called mating plugs, into female genitalia. Females may control which males deposit a plug through pre-copulatory mate choice or by influencing plug efficacy to avoid costs imposed by plugging. However, subsequent suitors might remove the plugs. We investigated behavioural and morphological aspects of plug deposition and removal in a promiscuous spider, Philodromus cespitum (Philodromidae). We performed mating trials to investigate factors affecting plugging. To identify the plug origin, we conducted a morphological analysis using 3D X-ray microtomography and histology of the male copulatory organ and the female genital tract. In P. cespitum, the plug material is produced in the male genital bulb and transferred to the female together with sperm. The copulation is brief and terminated by the female. After mating, plugging material was found in the genital atrium of all females, covering it to a varying degree (10-100%). The extent of coverage was associated with the duration of movements of male copulatory organ connected with sperm transfer (i.e. full haematodochal expansions) and with the number of taps a male delivered with his legs to the female during courtship. Males larger than the female performed more tapping movements. Mating trials with plugged females revealed that males could remove plugs partly or entirely. Removal success increased with increasing foreleg length ratio between the male who removed the plug and the one who deposited it. We discuss our results in the light of the potential female control of plug deposition and removal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Courtship; Female mate choice; Genital morphology; Polyandry; Sperm competition; X-ray microscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030630     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-018-1575-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  16 in total

Review 1.  Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits.

Authors:  M D Jennions; M Petrie
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2000-02

2.  Sexual selection, seminal coagulation and copulatory plug formation in primates.

Authors:  Alan L Dixson; Matthew J Anderson
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  2002 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Embedding in epoxy resins for ultrathin sectioning in electron microscopy.

Authors:  K C RICHARDSON; L JARETT; E H FINKE
Journal:  Stain Technol       Date:  1960-11

Review 4.  Sperm competition.

Authors:  Stuart Wigby; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Mating unplugged: a model for the evolution of mating plug (dis-)placement.

Authors:  Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Intersexual arms race? Genital coevolution in nephilid spiders (Araneae, Nephilidae).

Authors:  Matjaz Kuntner; Jonathan A Coddington; Jutta M Schneider
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  SEXUAL SELECTION IN A WOLF SPIDER: MALE DRUMMING ACTIVITY, BODY SIZE, AND VIABILITY.

Authors:  Janne Kotiaho; Rauno V Alatalo; Johanna Mappes; Silja Parri
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  The eunuch phenomenon: adaptive evolution of genital emasculation in sexually dimorphic spiders.

Authors:  Matjaž Kuntner; Ingi Agnarsson; Daiqin Li
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-05-08

9.  Mating plugs in polyandrous giants: which sex produces them, when, how and why?

Authors:  Matjaž Kuntner; Matjaž Gregorič; Shichang Zhang; Simona Kralj-Fišer; Daiqin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Description of a novel mating plug mechanism in spiders and the description of the new species Maeotasetastrobilaris (Araneae, Salticidae).

Authors:  Uriel Garcilazo-Cruz; Fernando Alvarez-Padilla
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 1.546

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Sperm competition when transfer is dangerous.

Authors:  Cristina Tuni; Jutta Schneider; Gabriele Uhl; Marie E Herberstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.