| Literature DB >> 30030500 |
Saransh Singh1, Yi Guo2, Bartłomiej Winiarski2,3, Timothy L Burnett4, Philip J Withers2, Marc De Graef5.
Abstract
We demonstrate the capability of a novel Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) dictionary indexing (DI) approach by means of orientation mapping of a highly deformed graded microstructure in a shot peened Aluminium 7075-T651 alloy. A low microscope accelerating voltage was used to extract, for the first time from a bulk sample, statistically significant orientation information from a region close to a shot crater, showing both recrystallized nano-grains and heavily deformed grains. We show that the robust nature of the DI method allows for faster acquisition of lower quality patterns, limited only by the camera hardware, compared to the acquisition speed and pattern quality required for the conventional Hough indexing (HI) approach. The proposed method paves the way for the quantitative and accurate EBSD characterization of heavily deformed microstructures at a sub-micrometer length scale in cases where the current indexing techniques largely fail.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30030500 PMCID: PMC6054629 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-29315-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Comparison of traditional and dictionary indexing. Side-by-side comparison of orientation maps obtained by conventional Hough-based indexing (HI) and the new dictionary indexing (DI) of the same dataset. Colors (see stereographic projection triangle in the inset) indicate which crystal direction is normal to the sampling plane.
Figure 2Grain size analysis in the nanocrystalline region. (a) Image quality map formed from the original EBSPs and (b) orientation similarity map (OSM) from the new DI approach. The insets in a and b are magnified views of the marked regions and arrows indicate nano-scale grains surrounding the second phase particle successfully reconstructed from DI. (c) shows a back scattered electron image revealing the secondary phase particles and a single large grain directly beneath the shot crater; (d) shows the grain size distribution of the Hough and Dictionary indexed data.
Figure 3Inverse pole figure and kernel average misorientation map comparisons. (a) and (c) respectively are the Hough and Dictionary indexed IPF (001) maps; (b) and (d) respectively are the kernel average misorientation (KAM) maps obtained from Hough indexing and dictionary indexing for a 1.5° maximum threshold.
Figure 4Grain orientation and grain boundary statistics. (a) Grain orientation spread map vs. equivalent grain size map; (b) and (c) grain boundary disorientation statistics and (d), (100), (110) and (111) pole figures for the texture in the recrystallized zone.
Figure 5Comparison between Hough indexed and Dictionary indexed EBSD results under different acquisition conditions. The EBSD conditions and the resulting frame rates (number of patterns acquired per second) are labeled above each of the columns. The numbers in the insets represent measures for the indexing success rate for the highlighted rectangular box in the first map on the top row.