Literature DB >> 30030407

Impact of removing point-of-sale tobacco displays on smoking behaviour among adolescents in Europe: a quasi-experimental study.

Maureen M Van Hurck1,2, Paulien A W Nuyts1, Karin Monshouwer3,4, Anton E Kunst1, Mirte A G Kuipers1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of European countries implemented a point-of-sale (PoS) display ban on tobacco products. This study assessed the association between PoS display bans in Europe and adolescent smoking and perceived accessibility of tobacco, 2-6 years after PoS display ban implementation.
METHODS: In a quasi-experimental design, we compared individuals in countries that did and countries that did not implement a PoS display ban, before and after implementation. We used repeated cross-sectional data of 174 878 15-year-old and 16-year-old adolescents from 25 countries from the 2007, 2011 and 2015 European Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs surveys. Multilevel logistic regression models examined smoking behaviour (regular smoking vs other) and perceived access (easy vs difficult) as a function of display ban implementation and controlled for survey year, gender, parental education and implementation of other tobacco control policies. Interaction with gender was tested.
RESULTS: The implementation of a PoS display ban was associated with a 15% larger drop in the odds of regular smoking (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91), but was not significantly associated with perceived accessibility of tobacco (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.892 to 1.03). Associations were similar in males and females (cross-level interactions of gender with display ban were not statistically significant for either outcome).
CONCLUSION: The implementation of PoS display bans in Europe was associated with a stronger decrease in regular smoking among adolescents. This decrease does not appear to be driven by a decreasing accessibility of tobacco, but might be caused by further de-normalisation of tobacco as a result of PoS display bans. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advertising and promotion; prevention; public policy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30030407     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  6 in total

1.  Impact of a ban on the open display of tobacco products in retail outlets on never smoking youth in the UK: findings from a repeat cross-sectional survey before, during and after implementation.

Authors:  Allison Ford; Anne Marie MacKintosh; Crawford Moodie; Mirte A G Kuipers; Gerard B Hastings; Linda Bauld
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Linking Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) data to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC): The case for Tunisia.

Authors:  Yosr Ayedi; Chahida Harizi; Afef Skhiri; Radhouane Fakhfakh
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 2.600

3.  Adolescents' perceptions of tobacco accessibility and smoking norms and attitudes in response to the tobacco point-of-sale display ban in Scotland: results from the DISPLAY Study.

Authors:  Mirte Ag Kuipers; Catherine Best; Michael Wilson; Dorothy Currie; Gozde Ozakinci; Anne-Marie MacKintosh; Martine Stead; Douglas Eadie; Andy MacGregor; Jamie Pearce; Amanda Amos; Sally Haw
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Adolescents notice fewer tobacco displays after implementation of the point-of-sale tobacco display ban in Finland.

Authors:  Jaana M Kinnunen; Hanna Ollila; Anu Linnansaari; David S Timberlake; Mirte A G Kuipers; Arja H Rimpelä
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Does smoke-free legislation work for teens too? A logistic regression analysis of smoking prevalence and gender among 16 years old in Ireland, using the 1995-2015 ESPAD school surveys.

Authors:  Shasha Li; Sheila Keogan; Luke Clancy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  An argument for phasing out sales of cigarettes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Smith; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 7.552

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.