Literature DB >> 30029957

Regenos spacers are not suitable for open-door laminoplasty because of serious adverse events caused by their insufficient mechanical strength.

Hiroshi Noguchi1, Masao Koda2, Toru Funayama2, Hiroshi Kumagai2, Junya Saito3, Chikato Mannoji4, Masaaki Aramomi5, Tetsuya Abe2, Katsuya Nagashima2, Kousei Miura2, Kentaro Mataki2, Kengo Fuji2, Takeo Furuya3, Masashi Yamazaki2.   

Abstract

We used a newly developed, high-porosity unidirectional porous hydroxyapatite spacer (Regenos spacer, not approved by the FDA). The aim of the present study was to elucidate the effectiveness of Regenos laminar spacers for open-door type laminoplasty. The present study included 39 patients who underwent open-door type laminoplasty with Regenos spacers from April 2015 to December 2016 and were followed up for at least 6 months after surgery. We grafted 68 Regenos spacers in 39 patients. Pre- and postoperative neurological status of patients were evaluated using JOA score and recovery rate. Breakage of Regenos spacers, laminar closure, and bone-hydroxyapatite spacer bonding were assessed using 12-month postoperative sagittal and axial CT images. The average preoperative JOA score was 9.5 ± 3.2/17, and the average postoperative JOA score was 12.5 ± 2.9/17. JOA score recovery rate was 34 ± 41% at the latest follow-up visit. The bony fusion rate of the hinge sides was 87%. Breakage and deformity of implanted spacers was observed in 69% of patients and 59% of spacers with a CT sagittal view, and CT axial view at 12 months revealed fine cracks and collapse in 17 spacers in 14 patients. The average angle was -2.4 ± 4.8°, including 46 of 68 spacers showing a negative value, resulting in a rate of laminar reclosure of 35%. Postoperative CT demonstrated good bone bonding rate. Nevertheless, clinical results with low recovery rates were obtained with complications related to the use of Regenos spacers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone bonding; Cervical spine; Complication; Hydroxyapatite; Laminar reclosure; Open-door laminoplasty; Spacer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30029957     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.07.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  3 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of all levels miniplate fixation versus a modified hybrid fixation in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zechuan Yang; Chaoxu Liu; Yang Lin; Weihua Hu; Wenjian Chen; Feng Li; Heng Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Unidirectional porous beta-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite artificial bone: a review of experimental evaluations and clinical applications.

Authors:  Toru Funayama; Hiroshi Noguchi; Hiroshi Kumagai; Kosuke Sato; Tomokazu Yoshioka; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Improved bone bonding of hydroxyapatite spacers with a high porosity in a quantitative computed tomography-image pixel analysis: A prospective 1-year comparative study of the consecutive cohort undergoing double-door cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Yoshiki Takeoka; Takashi Yurube; Koichiro Maeno; Yutaro Kanda; Ryu Tsujimoto; Kunihiko Miyazaki; Yuji Kakiuchi; Shingo Miyazaki; Zhongying Zhang; Toru Takada; Kotaro Nishida; Minoru Doita; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kenichiro Kakutani
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-02-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.