| Literature DB >> 30029663 |
Ernane N Nunes1,2, Natan M Guerra3, Edna Arévalo-Marín4,5, Carlos Antônio B Alves1,6, Viviany T do Nascimento7, Denise D da Cruz8,9, Ana H Ladio10, Silvanda de M Silva3, Rodrigo S de Oliveira1, Reinaldo F P de Lucena1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the local botanical knowledge of native food plants in three rural communities, located in the semiarid region of Paraíba State, Brazil, verifying possibilities of differences of knowledge among communities and between men and women.Entities:
Keywords: Botanic knowledge; Brazilian semiarid; Native foods; Rural communities; Traditional knowledge
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30029663 PMCID: PMC6053708 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-018-0249-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Fig. 1Geographic location of the study areas: São Mamede, Lagoa, and Itaporanga (Paraíba State, Northeast Brazil)
Species of native food plants considered helpful by the inhabitants from the rural communities of Várzea Alegre, Barroquinha, and Pau D’Arco, Northeast Brazil, with their general, current, and potential use values (UV)
| Community | Species | Vernacular Name | Herbarium Number | Plant Part Used | Food Use | UVgeneral | UVcurrent | UVpotential |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Várzea Alegre | Anacardiaceae | |||||||
| Cajarana | – | Fr | In nature, juice and sweet | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.04 | ||
| Umbuzeiro | 17.556 | Fr, Ro | Sweeties, juice, jam, ice, edible, umbuzada, cookies, and in nature. | 1.93 | 1.22 | 0.70 | ||
| Arecaceae | ||||||||
| Carnaúba | 17.553 | Fr | In nature | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.11 | ||
| Capparaceae | ||||||||
| Trapiá | – | Fr | In nature | 0.04 | – | 0.04 | ||
| Euphorbiaceae | ||||||||
| Favela White | 17.581 | Fr, Se | Flour | 0.48 | 0.41 | 0.07 | ||
| Fabaceae | ||||||||
| Jucá | 17.639 | Fr, Se | Flour | 0.04 | 0.04 | – | ||
| Olacaceae | ||||||||
| Ameixa | 17.557 | Fr | In nature and juice | 0.04 | – | 0.04 | ||
| Rhamnaceae | ||||||||
| Juazeiro | 17.575 | Fr | In nature | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.19 | ||
| Sapotaceae | ||||||||
| Quixabeira | 17.625 | Fr | In nature | 0.07 | – | 0.07 | ||
| Barroquinha | Anacardiaceae | |||||||
| Cajarana | – | Fr | Juice, sweeties, and in nature | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||
| Cajazeira | – | Fr | Juice and in nature | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.05 | ||
| Arecaceae | ||||||||
| Côco Catolé | 17.567 | Fr | In nature | 0.11 | – | 0.11 | ||
| Capparaceae | ||||||||
| Trapiá | – | Fr | In nature | 0.06 | – | 0.06 | ||
| Fabaceae | ||||||||
| Jatobá | 17.582 | Fr | In nature | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||
| Myrtaceae | ||||||||
| Ubáia | – | Fr | In nature | 0.06 | – | 0.06 | ||
| Olacaceae | ||||||||
| Ameixa | 17.557 | Fr | In nature | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||
| Passifloraceae | ||||||||
| Canapú | – | Fr | In nature | 0.06 | – | 0.06 | ||
| Rhamnaceae | ||||||||
| Juazeiro | 17.575 | Fr | In nature | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.17 | ||
| Sapotaceae | ||||||||
| Quixabeira | 17.625 | Fr | In nature | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||
| Pau D’Arco | Anacardiaceae | |||||||
| Cajarana | – | Fr | In nature | 0.07 | 0.07 | – | ||
| Arecaceae | ||||||||
| Carnaúba | 17.553 | Fr | In nature | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.29 | ||
| Burseraceae | ||||||||
| Umburana | 17.642 | Fr | In nature | 0.21 | 0.07 | 0.14 | ||
| Capparaceae | ||||||||
| Trapiá | – | Fr | In nature | 0.21 | – | 0.21 | ||
| Fabaceae | ||||||||
| Cumarú | 17.638 | Fr | In nature | 0.07 | – | 0.07 | ||
| Olacaceae | ||||||||
| Ameixa | 17.557 | Fr | In nature | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.14 | ||
| Rhamnaceae | ||||||||
| Juazeiro | 17.575 | Fr | In nature | 0.43 | 0.29 | 0.14 | ||
Used parts: Fr fruit, Ro root, Se seed
Fig. 2Average and standard deviation of the use value indexes (general, current, and potential) in the rural communities of Várzea Alegre, Barroquinha, and Pau D’Arco, Northeast Brazil
Use value for men and women from the rural communities of Várzea Alegre in São Mamede, Barroquinha in Lagoa, and Pau D’Arco in Itaporanga (Northeast Brazil)
| Community | Species | Vernacular Name | Women | Men | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UVgeneral | UVcurrent | UVpotential | UVgeneral | UVcurrent | UVpotential | |||
| Várzea Alegre |
| Ameixa | – | – | – | 0.08 | – | 0.08 |
|
| Cajarana | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.08 | – | |
| Carnaúba | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.15 | – | 0.15 | ||
| Favela | 0.57 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.07 | ||
|
| Juazeiro | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.29 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.07 | |
| Jucá | – | – | – | 0.08 | 0.08 | – | ||
| Quixabeira | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | – | – | – | ||
| Trapiá | – | – | – | 0.08 | – | 0.08 | ||
| Umbuzeiro | 1.71 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 2.15 | 1.46 | 0.69 | ||
| Barroquinha | Ameixa | – | – | – | 0.28 | 0.14 | 0.14 | |
| Cajarana | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.09 | – | – | – | ||
| Cajazeira | 0.27 | 0.27 | – | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | ||
| Coco catolé | 0.09 | – | 0.09 | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | ||
| Canapú | 0.09 | – | 0.09 | – | – | – | ||
|
| Jatobá | 0.09 | 0.09 | – | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | |
|
| Juazeiro | 0.27 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | |
| Quixabeira | 0.09 | 0.09 | – | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | ||
| Trapiá | 0.09 | – | 0.09 | – | – | – | ||
| Ubáia | – | – | – | 0.14 | – | 0.14 | ||
| Pau D’Arco | Ameixa | 1.00 | 1.00 | – | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.25 | |
| Cajarana | – | – | – | 0.13 | 0.13 | – | ||
| Carnaúba | 0.50 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.25 | – | 0.25 | ||
| Cumarú | 0.17 | – | 0.17 | – | – | – | ||
|
| Juazeiro | 0.50 | 0.33 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.13 | |
| Trapiá | 0.17 | – | 0.17 | 0.25 | – | 0.25 | ||
| Umburana | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.13 | – | 0.13 | ||
Distribution of traditional knowledge by gender among rural communities in the semiarid region of Paraiba State, Brazil
| Community | Genre | Methods of use | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Várzea Alegre | Women | 1.85 ± 0.94aA | 3.21 ± 1.96aA |
| Men | 2.30 ± 2.17aA | 3.38 ± 2.72aA | |
| Pau d’Arco | Women | 1.00 ± 0.00aB | 2.66 ± 1.03aAB |
| Men | 1.00 ± 0.00aB | 2.00 ± 1.41aAB | |
| Barroquinha | Women | 1.09 ± 0.30aB | 1.18 ± 0.40aB |
| Men | 1.00 ± 0.00aB | 1.14 ± 0.37aB |
Equal lowercase letters in the same column, within each region between genders, indicated the absence of significant differences, using the Mann-Whitney test (p < 0.05)
Different capital letters in the same column among regions for the same gender indicate significant differences, using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3General, current, and potential use values, considering gender, in the rural communities of Várzea Alegre, Barroquinha, and Pau D’Arco, Northeast Brazil