| Literature DB >> 30029462 |
Sahar Ramin Gul1,2, Matiullah Khan3,4, Yi Zeng5, Maohua Lin6,7, Bo Wu8, Chi-Tay Tsai9.
Abstract
Using first principle calculations, the effect of Ce with different doping concentrations in the network of Zirconium dioxide (ZrO₂) is studied. The ZrO₂ cell volume linearly increases with the increasing Ce doping concentration. The intrinsic band gap of ZrO₂ of 5.70 eV reduces to 4.67 eV with the 2.08% Ce doping. In 4.16% cerium doped ZrO₂, the valence band maximum and conduction band minimum come closer to each other, about 1.1 eV, compared to ZrO₂. The maximum band gap reduction of ZrO₂ is observed at 6.25% Ce doping concentration, having the value of 4.38 eV. No considerable shift in the band structure is found with further increase in the doping level. The photo-response of the ZrO₂ is modulated with Ce insertion, and two distinct modifications are observed in the absorption coefficient: an imaginary part of the dielectric function and conductivity. A 2.08% Ce-doped ZrO₂ modeled system reduces the intensities of peaks in the optical spectra while keeping the peaks of intrinsic ZrO₂. However, the intrinsic peaks related to ZrO₂ completely vanish in 4.16%, 6.25%, 8.33%, and 12.5% Ce doped ZrO₂, and a new absorption hump is created.Entities:
Keywords: band structure; ceria-zirconia solid solution; first principle; optical response; thermal barrier coatings
Year: 2018 PMID: 30029462 PMCID: PMC6073694 DOI: 10.3390/ma11071238
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The Ce doping concentration and Ce/Zr ratio of simulated models.
| S. No. | Model | Representation | Ce Doping Concentration (%) | Ce/Zr Ratio (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zr16O32 | Zr-0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2 | CeZr15O32 | CeZr-1 | 2.08 | 6.25 |
| 3 | Ce2Zr14O32 | CeZr-2 | 4.16 | 12.5 |
| 4 | Ce3Zr13O32 | CeZr-3 | 6.25 | 18.75 |
| 5 | Ce4Zr12O32 | CeZr-4 | 8.33 | 25.0 |
| 6 | Ce6Zr10O32 | CeZr-6 | 12.5 | 37.5 |
Figure 1Ce incorporated zirconia structure (a) CeZr-1, and (b) CeZr-6.
Lattice parameters and unit cell volumes of Ce doped zirconia modeled systems.
| Model | a (Å) | b (Å) | c (Å) | Cell Volume (Å3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zr-0 | 5.0790 | 5.0790 | 5.0796 | 131.0392 |
| Zr-0 (calculations [ | 5.0654 | 5.0654 | 5.0654 | 129.974 |
| Zr-0 (experiments [ | - | - | 5.090 | - |
| CeZr-1 | 5.0959 | 5.0945 | 5.0925 | 132.8176 |
| CeZr-2 | 5.1179 | 5.1179 | 5.1132 | 133.9314 |
| CeZr-3 | 5.1489 | 5.1520 | 5.1482 | 136.5704 |
| CeZr-4 | 5.1582 | 5.1582 | 5.1604 | 137.3086 |
| CeZr-6 | 5.1886 | 5.1886 | 5.1733 | 139.2799 |
Figure 2Variations in the cell volume with increasing Ce doping concentration.
Bond lengths (averaged) of the simulated systems.
| S. No. | Model | O-Zr (Å) | O-O (Å) | O-Ce (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zr-0 | 2.1993 | 2.5395 | - |
| 2 | CeZr-1 | 2.2004 | 2.5430 | 2.2885 |
| 3 | CeZr-2 | 2.2049 | 2.5507 | 2.2919 |
| 4 | CeZr-3 | 2.2127 | 2.5643 | 2.2992 |
| 5 | CeZr-4 | 2.2144 | 2.5650 | 2.2944 |
| 6 | CeZr-6 | 2.2199 | 2.5813 | 2.3006 |
Figure 3Band structure comparison of simulated models: (a) Zr-0, (b) CeZr-1, (c) CeZr-2, (d) CeZr-3, (e) CeZr-4, and (f) CeZr-6.
Figure 4Variations in the band gap of Ce- ZrO2 system with increasing Ce doping concentration.
Figure 5Density of states of simulated models and their comparison. The vertical dashed line represents the Fermi level.
Figure 6Response of the simulated models to upcoming photons with different wavelengths: (a) absorption, (b) imaginary part of dielectric function, and (c) conductivity.