Literature DB >> 30029316

Microplastic hotspots in the Snake and Lower Columbia rivers: A journey from the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem to the Pacific Ocean.

Kirsten J Kapp1, Ellen Yeatman2.   

Abstract

It is widely understood that microplastics (MPs) are ubiquitous in the marine environment yet less is known about MP abundance in freshwater rivers, particularly those of the western United States. This study documents MP pollution along the Snake River (∼1735 km) and from its confluence with the Columbia River to the Pacific Ocean. Grab and plankton net samples (mesh size 100 μm) were collected from the top 25 cm of surface water every 80.5 river km. MPs were identified if they met visual criteria and were verified with the hot needle test. A small representative subset of MPs from the net samples (16.7%) were selected based on appearance for micro-Raman spectroscopy in effort to provide examples of polymer types found in this study. Seventy-five percent of grab samples and 92.8% of net samples contained MPs, with concentrations ranging from 0 to 5.405 MP L-1 and 0 to 0.014 MP L-1 (0 to 13.7 MP m-3), respectively. The majority of fragments, films and beads were between 100 μm and 333 μm. This study identifies potential hotspots of MP pollution along the Snake and Lower Columbia rivers and prioritizes areas where more intensive sampling is needed. Sites with low flow or those further down river had higher numbers and the top two hotspots were located in areas with low population density but high agricultural use. Monitoring MP abundance in freshwater systems is important for establishing baseline levels of MP pollution and can direct laboratory toxicology studies in using more environmentally relevant concentrations for a better indication of how MP pollution affects ecosystems.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emerging contaminant; Freshwater pollution; Microfibers; Microplastics; Rivers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30029316      PMCID: PMC6375537          DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  5 in total

1.  Identification and removal of micro- and nano-plastics: Efficient and cost-effective methods.

Authors:  Aayushi Kundu; Nagaraj P Shetti; Soumen Basu; Kakarla Raghava Reddy; Mallikarjuna N Nadagouda; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 16.744

2.  Seasonal heterogeneity and a link to precipitation in the release of microplastic during COVID-19 outbreak from the Greater Jakarta area to Jakarta Bay, Indonesia.

Authors:  Muhammad Reza Cordova; Yaya Ihya Ulumuddin; Triyoni Purbonegoro; Rachma Puspitasari; Nur Fitriah Afianti; Ricky Rositasari; Deny Yogaswara; Muhammad Hafizt; Marindah Yulia Iswari; Nurul Fitriya; Ernawati Widyastuti; Irfan Kampono; Muhammad Taufik Kaisupy; Singgih Prasetyo Adi Wibowo; Riyana Subandi; Sofia Yuniar Sani; Lilik Sulistyowati; Ahmad Muhtadi; Etty Riani; Simon M Cragg
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 7.001

3.  Characteristics of Microplastics and Their Affiliated PAHs in Surface Water in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Authors:  Nguyen Thao Nguyen; Nguyen Thi Thanh Nhon; Ho Truong Nam Hai; Nguyen Doan Thien Chi; To Thi Hien
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 4.  Microplastic sampling techniques in freshwaters and sediments: a review.

Authors:  Nastaran Razeghi; Amir Hossein Hamidian; Chenxi Wu; Yu Zhang; Min Yang
Journal:  Environ Chem Lett       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.027

5.  Microplastics in Lake Mead National Recreation Area, USA: Occurrence and biological uptake.

Authors:  Austin K Baldwin; Andrew R Spanjer; Michael R Rosen; Theresa Thom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.