| Literature DB >> 30028875 |
Byunghee Yoo1, Patricia Greninger2, Giovanna T Stein2, Regina K Egan2, Joseph McClanaghan2, Anna Moore1, Cyril H Benes2, Zdravka Medarova1.
Abstract
Since microRNAs (miRNAs, miRs) have been implicated in oncogenesis, many of them have been identified as therapeutic targets. Previously we have demonstrated that miRNA-10b acts as a master regulator of the viability of metastatic tumor cells and represents a target for therapeutic intervention. We designed and synthesized an inhibitor of miR-10b, termed MN-anti-miR10b. We showed that treatment with MN-anti-miR10b led to durable regression/elimination of established metastases in murine models of metastatic breast cancer. Since miRNA-10b has been associated with various metastatic and non-metastatic cancers, in the present study, we investigated the effect of MN-anti-miR10b in a panel of over 600 cell lines derived from a variety of human malignancies. We observed an effect on the viability of multiple cell lines within each cancer type and a mostly dichotomous response with cell lines either strongly responsive to MN-anti-miR10b or not at all even at maximum dose tested, suggesting a very high specificity of the effect. Genomic modeling of the drug response showed enrichment of genes associated with the proto-oncogene, c-Jun.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30028875 PMCID: PMC6054402 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Cell viability.
Representative line graphs of MN-anti-miR10b concentration vs cell viability for multiple cell lines within representative cancer tissues of origin.
Fig 2Profile of response across cell lines from different tissues of origin.
The response to MN-anti-miR10b is shown as IC50 (μM), Area Under the dose response Curve (AUC) or Emax (maximum effect observed: minimum cell viability observed across the two maximum doses tested).
Fig 3Network of proteins encoded by the genes found to be predictive of sensitivity to MN-anti-miR10b by elastic net regression together with JUN.
The functional network was built in STRING and kmeans clustering was performed to identify subnetworks (set to 5 clusters in STRING using all evidence of interactions and interaction score of 0.4 or more). Nodes from the EN output that were not found to be connected are excluded for visualization purposes.