| Literature DB >> 30028857 |
Augusto César Cardoso-Dos-Santos1, Juliano Boquett1, Marcelo Zagonel de Oliveira2, Sidia Maria Callegari-Jacques3, Márcia Helena Barbian3, Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino1,2,4, Ursula Matte1,2,4, Lavínia Schuler-Faccini1,2,4.
Abstract
Twin births are an important public health issue due to health complications for both mother and children. While it is known that contemporary factors have drastically changed the epidemiology of twins in certain developed countries, in Brazil, relevant data are still scarce. Thus, we carried out a population-based study of live births in spatial and temporal dimensions using data from Brazil's Live Birth Information System, which covers the entire country. Over 41 million births registered between 2001 and 2014 were classified as singleton, twin or multiple. Twinning rates (TR) averaged 9.41 per 1,000 for the study period and a first-order autoregressive model of time-series analysis revealed a global upward trend over time; however, there were important regional differences. In fact, a Cluster and Outlier Analysis (Anselin Local Moran's I) was performed and identified clusters of high TR in an area stretching from the south of Brazil's Northeast Region to the South Region (Global Moran Index = 0.062, P < 0.001). Spearman's correlation coefficient and a Wilcoxon matched pairs test revealed a positive association between Human Development Index (HDI) and TRs in different scenarios, suggesting that the HDI might be an important indicator of childbearing age and assisted reproduction techniques in Brazil. Furthermore, there was a sharp increase of 26.42% in TR in women aged 45 and over during study period. The upward temporal trend in TRs is in line with recent observations from other countries, while the spatial analysis has revealed two very different realities within the same country. Our approach to TR using HDI as a proxy for underlying socioeconomic changes can be applied to other developing countries with regional inequalities resembling those found in Brazil.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30028857 PMCID: PMC6054405 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200885
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Geographical features of Brazil.
The map follows the geographical division, including regions and states mentioned in the paper, of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics–IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). The underlying cartographic database is publicly accessible on the IBGE website [19].
Fig 2Temporal distribution.
Singleton, twin and multiple birth rates per 1,000 births in Brazil, 2001–2014.
Fig 3Maternal age and twinning.
TRs among different classes of maternal age in Brazil, 2001–2014.
Brazilian twinning rates for the period from 2001 to 2014.
In addition to the individual values for 2001 and 2014, the average value, percentage variation, standard deviation and the parameters estimated in the autoregressive (AR) models are also shown.
| Location | Twinning rate (‰) | Variation (%) | Standard deviation | AR (temporal parameter) | AR (temporal parameter) | Co-variable maternal age ≥ 30 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2014 | Average | ||||||
| BRAZIL | 8.65 | 10.15 | 9.41 | 17.34% | 0.50 | 0.97 | 0.47 | 0.86 |
| NORTH | 6.92 | 7.54 | 7.31 | 8.88% | 0.24 | 0.51 | -0.35 | 0.69 |
| Roraima | 7.68 | 8.47 | 8.17 | 10.22% | 0.52 | -0.17 | -0.53 | 0.54 |
| Acre | 7.28 | 9.12 | 7.54 | 25.20% | 0.76 | 0.29 | 0.56 | 1.38 |
| Amazonas | 6.42 | 7.17 | 7.06 | 11.73% | 0.38 | 0.11 | -0.36 | 0.72 |
| Rondônia | 7.51 | 6.67 | 6.88 | -11.12% | 0.98 | -0.35 | -0.21 | 0.69 |
| Pará | 6.81 | 7.41 | 7.19 | 8.86% | 0.25 | 0.06 | -0.21 | 0.62 |
| Amapá | 7.32 | 6.35 | 7.48 | -13.25% | 0.71 | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.59 |
| Tocantins | 7.42 | 8.53 | 7.76 | 14.92% | 0.57 | 0.01 | -0.57 | 0.66 |
| NORTHEAST | 8.37 | 9.07 | 8.71 | 8.35% | 0.23 | 0.65 | 0.04 | 0.55 |
| Maranhão | 8.56 | 7.60 | 8.02 | -11.17% | 0.34 | 0.47 | 0.02 | -1.15 |
| Piauí | 8.58 | 8.92 | 8.45 | 3.97% | 0.58 | -0.20 | -0.06 | 0.33 |
| Ceará | 8.42 | 9.29 | 8.46 | 10.31% | 0.35 | -0.46 | -0.40 | 0.44 |
| Rio Grande do Norte | 8.07 | 9.00 | 8.34 | 11.45% | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.34 | 0.73 |
| Paraíba | 8.89 | 9.79 | 8.99 | 10.16% | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.03 | 0.83 |
| Pernambuco | 8.37 | 9.11 | 8.83 | 8.84% | 0.31 | 0.44 | -0.40 | 0.71 |
| Alagoas | 7.34 | 8.56 | 8.22 | 16.74% | 0.54 | 0.05 | -0.11 | 1.39 |
| Sergipe | 8.42 | 9.36 | 9.08 | 11.19% | 0.64 | 0.09 | -0.02 | 0.81 |
| Bahia | 8.43 | 9.69 | 9.31 | 14.91% | 0.53 | 0.72 | -0.11 | 0.84 |
| SOUTHEAST | 9.20 | 11.33 | 10.34 | 23.16% | 0.73 | 0.96 | 0.42 | 0.92 |
| Minas Gerais | 9.27 | 10.83 | 10.13 | 16.74% | 0.65 | 0.90 | 0.45 | 0.82 |
| Espírito Santo | 8.47 | 10.20 | 9.28 | 20.47% | 0.73 | 0.87 | -0.25 | 0.90 |
| Rio de Janeiro | 8.88 | 10.43 | 9.91 | 17.45% | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.41 | 0.97 |
| São Paulo | 9.35 | 11.98 | 10.69 | 28.12% | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.21 | 0.96 |
| SOUTH | 9.09 | 11.02 | 10.07 | 21.19% | 0.71 | 0.93 | 0.05 | 1.17 |
| Paraná | 9.01 | 10.58 | 9.86 | 17.36% | 0.67 | 0.87 | -0.51 | 1.21 |
| Santa Catarina | 8.52 | 10.72 | 9.74 | 25.75% | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.20 | 1.18 |
| Rio Grande do Sul | 9.48 | 11.70 | 10.51 | 23.41% | 0.83 | 0.78 | -0.18 | 1.12 |
| MIDWEST | 8.31 | 10.17 | 9.07 | 22.39% | 0.61 | 0.92 | -0.27 | 0.81 |
| Mato Grosso do Sul | 7.96 | 9.93 | 8.73 | 24.82% | 0.58 | 0.80 | 0.19 | 1.03 |
| Mato Grosso | 7.73 | 10.30 | 8.70 | 33.25% | 0.83 | 0.81 | -0.46 | 0.98 |
| Goiás | 8.61 | 9.57 | 8.91 | 11.12% | 0.57 | 0.65 | -0.72 | 0.76 |
| Distrito Federal | 8.60 | 11.59 | 10.12 | 34.69% | 0.89 | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.83 |
aModel considering only the time period.
bModel considering time and the co-variable maternal age ≥ 30.
*Stastitically significant at 0.05 level.
Fig 4Cluster and Outlier analysis.
(A) Distribution of average Twinning Rates (TRs) across Brazilian municipalities. (B) Distribution of Human Development Index (HDI) figures from the 2000 census across Brazilian municipalities. (C) Spatial correlation index from normalized average TR and 2010's HDI across Brazilian municipalities. The cartographic database used for the construction of the map is publicly accessible on the IBGE website [19].