Literature DB >> 30028054

A narrative synthesis of the quality of cancer care and development of an integrated conceptual framework.

Kim-Lin Chiew1,2,3, Puma Sundaresan1,4, Bin Jalaludin2,3,5, Shalini K Vinod6,7.   

Abstract

The general paradigms that exist to guide measures in quality of care do not sufficiently deal with the changing needs of cancer management. The aim of this study was to review the literature regarding the quality of cancer care and develop a conceptual framework relevant to current practice. A textual narrative review of the literature was conducted by searching electronic databases from the last 10 years. Articles were then screened and included if they were both relevant to the management of cancer and standards in quality of care. Thematic analysis of the included articles was performed. Eighty-three articles were included and 12 domains identified and integrated with current models to develop a conceptual framework. These included: healthcare delivery system; timeliness; access; appropriateness of care; multidisciplinary and coordinated care; patient experience; technical aspects; safety; patient-centred outcomes; disease-specific outcomes; innovation and improvement and value. We propose a conceptual framework for the quality of cancer care based on relevant and current oncology practice. This presents a more practical and comprehensive approach than general models, and can be used by healthcare providers, managers and policy makers to guide and identify the need for metrics for quality improvements.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health services; healthcare quality; neoplasms; oncology service; quality improvement; quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30028054     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Narrative Nursing Intervention on Shame in Elderly Patients with Bladder Cancer after Ileal Bladder Replacement: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lang Wang; Dan Wu; Shufang Wu; Ya Liu; Xiaoxi Tan; Yun Liu; Ziyuan Wu; Qian Wang; Xiachan He
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  A focused ethnography in the context of a European cancer research hospital accreditation program.

Authors:  Elisa Mazzini; Francesco Soncini; Loredana Cerullo; Lucia Genovese; Giovanni Apolone; Luca Ghirotto; Giorgio Mazzi; Massimo Costantini
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Quality indicators for radiation oncology.

Authors:  Susan V Harden; Kim-Lin Chiew; Jeremy Millar; Shalini K Vinod
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.667

Review 4.  Empowering patients in decision-making in radiation oncology - can we do better?

Authors:  Michelle Leech; Matthew S Katz; Joanna Kazmierska; Julie McCrossin; Sandra Turner
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.603

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.