Literature DB >> 30028007

The roles of delay and probability discounting in texting while driving: Toward the development of a translational scientific program.

Yusuke Hayashi1, Heather J Fessler1, Jonathan E Friedel2, Anne M Foreman2, Oliver Wirth2.   

Abstract

A sample of 109 college students completed a survey to assess how frequently they send or read text messages while driving. In a novel discounting task with a hypothetical scenario in which participants receive a text message while driving, they rated the likelihood of replying to a text message immediately versus waiting to reply until arriving at a destination. The scenario presented several delays to a destination and probabilities of a motor vehicle crash. The likelihood of waiting to reply decreased as a function of both the delay until the destination and the probability of a motor vehicle crash. Self-reported higher frequencies of texting while driving were associated with greater rates of both delay and probability discounting. The degree of delay discounting was altered as a function of the probability of a motor vehicle crash and vice versa. These results suggest that both delay and probability discounting are important underlying mechanisms of drivers' decision to text while driving.
© 2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  college students; delay discounting; impulsivity; probability discounting; texting while driving; translational science

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30028007      PMCID: PMC6376405          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  38 in total

Review 1.  Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian; Samuel M McClure
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Discounting the value of safety: effects of perceived risk and effort.

Authors:  Sigurdur O Sigurdsson; Matthew A Taylor; Oliver Wirth
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2013-06-14

Review 3.  Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Mikhail N Koffarnus; Kirstin M Gatchalian
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 12.310

4.  Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers.

Authors:  S H Mitchell
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  James MacKillop; Michael T Amlung; Lauren R Few; Lara A Ray; Lawrence H Sweet; Marcus R Munafò
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Self-reported differences on measures of executive function in a patient sample of pathological gamblers.

Authors:  Rory C Reid; Heather L McKittrick; Margarit Davtian; Timothy W Fong
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 2.292

7.  How many impulsivities? A discounting perspective.

Authors:  Leonard Green; Joel Myerson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Using crowdsourcing to examine relations between delay and probability discounting.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Warren K Bickel; Anne E Carter; Christopher T Franck; E Terry Mueller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  An Evaluation of the Effects of a Mild Delayed Verbal Punisher on Choice of an Immediate Reinforcer by Children With Autism.

Authors:  Jolene R Sy; Leonard Green; Olivia Gratz; Thea Ervin
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2016-01-12

10.  Regret Expression and Social Learning Increases Delay to Sexual Gratification.

Authors:  Amanda J Quisenberry; Celia R Eddy; David L Patterson; Christopher T Franck; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  A Monte Carlo method for comparing generalized estimating equations to conventional statistical techniques for discounting data.

Authors:  Jonathan E Friedel; William B DeHart; Anne M Foreman; Michael E Andrew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relationships between Driver Errors and Delay Discounting in a Simulated Driving Task.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; Qian Chen; Shouhuai Xu
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-02-19

3.  A behavioral economic demand analysis of mothers' decision to exclusively breastfeed in the workplace.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Nicole M Fisher; Donald A Hantula; Lydia Furman; Yukiko Washio
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.215

4.  Texting while driving: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Anne M Foreman; Jonathan E Friedel; Yusuke Hayashi; Oliver Wirth
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2020-11-13

5.  Threat appeals reduce impulsive decision making associated with texting while driving: A behavioral economic approach.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Anne M Foreman; Jonathan E Friedel; Oliver Wirth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rethinking Cell Phone Use While Driving: Isolated Risk Behavior or a Pattern of Risk-Taking Associated with Impulsivity in Young Drivers?

Authors:  Elizabeth A Walshe; Flaura K Winston; Dan Romer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Behavioral economic methods to inform infectious disease response: Prevention, testing, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Derek D Reed; Steven R Hursh; Lindsay P Schwartz; Rachel N S Foster; Brett W Gelino; Robert S LeComte; Fernanda S Oda; Allyson R Salzer; Tadd D Schneider; Lauren Dayton; Carl Latkin; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.