| Literature DB >> 30027807 |
Christian T Doabler1, Ben Clarke2, Derek Kosty3, Evangeline Kurtz-Nelson2, Hank Fien2, Keith Smolkowski3, Scott K Baker2,4.
Abstract
Group size and treatment intensity are understudied topics in mathematics intervention research. This study examined whether the treatment intensity and overall intervention effects of an empirically validated Tier 2 mathematics intervention varied between intervention groups with 2:1 and 5:1 student-teacher ratios. Student practice opportunities and the quality of explicit instruction served as treatment intensity metrics. A total of 465 kindergarten students with mathematics difficulties from 136 intervention groups participated. Results suggested comparable performances between the 2:1 and 5:1 intervention groups on six outcome measures. Observation data indicated that student practice differed by group size. Students in the 5:1 groups received more opportunities to practice with their peers, while students in the 2:1 groups participated in more frequent and higher quality individualized practice opportunities. Implications in terms of delivering Tier 2 interventions in small-group formats and engaging at-risk learners in meaningful practice opportunities are discussed.Keywords: explicit mathematics instruction; group size; mathematics difficulties; student practice opportunities; treatment intensity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30027807 DOI: 10.1177/0022219418789376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Learn Disabil ISSN: 0022-2194