| Literature DB >> 30027796 |
Kunlong Yang1,2, Yana Shadkchan3, Joanna Tannous2, Julio A Landero Figueroa4, Philipp Wiemann2, Nir Osherov3, Shihua Wang1, Nancy P Keller2.
Abstract
The ubiquitous fungus Aspergillus flavus is notorious for contaminating many important crops and food-stuffs with the carcinogenic mycotoxin, aflatoxin. This fungus is also the second most frequent Aspergillus pathogen after A. fumigatus infecting immunosuppressed patients. In many human fungal pathogens including A. fumigatus, the ability to defend from toxic levels of copper (Cu) is essential in pathogenesis. In A. fumigatus, the Cu-fist DNA binding protein, AceA, and the Cu ATPase transporter, CrpA, play critical roles in Cu defense. Here, we show that A. flavus tolerates higher concentrations of Cu than A. fumigatus and other Aspergillus spp. associated with the presence of two homologs of A. fumigatus CrpA termed CrpA and CrpB. Both crpA and crpB are transcriptionally induced by increasing Cu concentrations via AceA activity. Deletion of crpA or crpB alone did not alter high Cu tolerance, suggesting they are redundant. Deletion of both genes resulted in extreme Cu sensitivity that was greater than that following deletion of the regulatory transcription factor aceA. The ΔcrpAΔcrpB and ΔaceA strains were also sensitive to ROI stress. Compared to wild type, these mutants were impaired in the ability to colonize maize seed treated with Cu fungicide but showed no difference in virulence on non-treated seed. A mouse model of invasive aspergillosis showed ΔcrpAΔcrpB and to a lesser degree ΔaceA to be significantly reduced in virulence, following the greater sensitivity of ΔcrpAΔcrpB to Cu than ΔaceA.Entities:
Keywords: AceA; CrpA; CrpB; P1-type ATPase; ROI stress; copper homeostasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30027796 PMCID: PMC6177249 DOI: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1496774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virulence ISSN: 2150-5594 Impact factor: 5.882
Figure 1.Growth phenotype of different Aspergillus strains on different Cu concentrations. 2000 spores of indicated Aspergillus strains grown on solidified GMM under indicated Cu concentrations for 72 h at 37°C.
Figure 2.Phylogenetic analysis of heavy metal ATPases (HMA). The phylogenetic tree based on the available HMA sequences from Aspergillus sequences available through NCBI was constructed by MAFFT and Fasttree using the Neighbour-joining method as described in Material and Methods. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 replicates. Aspergillus flavus proteins are shown in red, A. fumigatus in green, A. parasiticus in orange, and A. nidulans in green.
Figure 3.crpA and crpB were induced by Cu and were redundant in Cu detoxification. (A) Northern blot analysis of crpA and crpB in A. flavus wild-type strain. The wild-type strain was grown in liquid GMM without Cu for 24 h at 37°C and then mycelium mass was divided in half where one-half was grown in medium with no Cu and one-half was grown in 200 μM Cu for 1 h before harvesting. rRNA visualization is loaded as control. (B) Growth assay of A. flavus crp mutants on solidified GMM for 72 h at 37°C under indicated Cu concentrations.
Figure 4.Functional analysis of AceA and its regulation on crpA and crpB. (A) Growth assay of ΔaceA and aceA mutants on solidified GMM for 72 h at 37°C under indicated Cu concentrations. (B) Northern blot analysis of crpA and crpB in A. flavus wild-type strain. The wild-type strain grown in liquid GMM without Cu for 24 h at 37°C, then to one-half of the cultures, Cu was added to a final concentration of 200 μM for 1 h before harvesting. rRNA visualization is loaded as control. (C) Phenotypic analysis of the strains on solidified GMM under the indicated Cu concentrations for 48 h at 37°C. (D) Total Cu amount from A. flavus mycelia. All strains (5 × 106 conidia/L) were incubated in 50 mL of liquid GMM without Cu in four replicates at 37°C and 200 rpm shaking for 12h. To one-half of the cultures, Cu was added to a final concentration of 50 μM for 12 h before harvesting. Error bars represent standard deviations, asterisk “*, “**” or “***” represent significant differences at p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively, according to t-test.
Figure 5.ROS stress increases Cu toxicity in ΔaceA and double ΔcrpAΔcrpB mutants. Growth phenotypes of indicated strains on solidified GMM under indicated concentration of Cu plus supplements as indicated for 48 h at 37°C. MEN = menadione, GSH = l-glutathione.
Figure 6.Corn infection with indicated strains. (A) 200 ul of a 106 spore/ml suspension of spores in 0.01% Tween 20 were inoculated on corn and the vials kept in a moist incubator at 29℃ with 12 hours’ light/dark cycling for 5 days. (B) Conidial production assessed from infected maize kernel with and without Cu fungicide treatment. The spores were washed off the seeds with 2.5 mL 100% MeOH and counted. Each sample has four replicates. (C) Aflatoxin extracted from corn and quantified by HPLC. Asterisk “*” or “**” represent significant differences at p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively, according to t-test.
Figure 7.Deletion of A. flavus crpA and crpB results in attenuated virulence in lung-infected immunocompromised mice. (A) Survival rates of ICR mice immunocompromised with cortisone acetate and infected intranasally with 5 × 105 A. flavus WT (n = 19 animals), ΔcrpAΔcrpB (n = 10), ΔaceA (n = 19) or aceA complemented (n = 8) strains, and survival monitored over 18 days. Virulence was only attenuated in the ΔcrpAΔcrpB strain (p = 0.0004) and not in the ΔaceA strain (p = 0.56). (B) Colony forming unit (CFU) of wild type and copper mutants from infected mice lungs. (C) Histopathology of infected mice lungs stained with Grocott’s methenamine silver stain (GMS; fungal staining) and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E; tissue and nuclear staining). Bar = 200 µm.
Aspergillus strains used in this study.
| Name of strain | Genotype | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NRRL 3357 | Keller lab | |
| GD4.4 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 28 | Keller lab | |
| TXZ118.2 | Keller lab | |
| PC70 | Keller lab | |
| PC42 | Keller lab | |
| Af293 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC44 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC46 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC43 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 2006 | Keller lab | |
| CEA10 | Keller lab | |
| FGSC4A | Keller lab | |
| CBS 513.65 | Keller lab | |
| CBS 506.65 | Keller lab | |
| DTO 11-B6 | Keller lab | |
| CBS 101740 | Keller lab | |
| CBS 172.66 | Keller lab | |
| CBS 113.46 | Keller lab | |
| NIH 2624 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 2104 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 2098 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 266 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 2103 | Keller lab | |
| SU-1 | Keller lab | |
| ATCC 56774 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 141 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 1039 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 143 | Keller lab | |
| SRRC 164 | Keller lab | |
| TJW 149.27 | [ | |
| TJES20.1 | [ | |
| TXZ 21.3 | [ | |
| TJES19.1 | [ | |
| TKY6.1 | This study | |
| TKY6.3 | This study | |
| TKY7.1 | This study | |
| TKY11.4 | This study | |
| TKY5.1 | This study | |
| TKY5.3 | This study | |
| TKY10.3 | This study | |
| TKY20.2 | This study | |
| TKY21.1 | This study | |
| TKY22.4 | This study | |
| TKY23.3 | This study |