Literature DB >> 30027631

Blood pressure targets for the treatment of people with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Luis Carlos Saiz1, Javier Gorricho, Javier Garjón, Mª Concepción Celaya, Juan Erviti, Leire Leache.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This is the first update of the review published in 2017. Hypertension is a prominent preventable cause of premature morbidity and mortality. People with hypertension and established cardiovascular disease are at particularly high risk, so reducing blood pressure to below standard targets may be beneficial. This strategy could reduce cardiovascular mortality and morbidity but could also increase adverse events. The optimal blood pressure target in people with hypertension and established cardiovascular disease remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To determine if 'lower' blood pressure targets (≤ 135/85 mmHg) are associated with reduction in mortality and morbidity as compared with 'standard' blood pressure targets (≤ 140 to 160/90 to 100 mmHg) in the treatment of people with hypertension and a history of cardiovascular disease (myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, peripheral vascular occlusive disease). SEARCH
METHODS: For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials up to February 2018: Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (from 1982), along with the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. We applied no language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included more than 50 participants per group and provided at least six months' follow-up. Trial reports had to present data for at least one primary outcome (total mortality, serious adverse events, total cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality). Eligible interventions involved lower targets for systolic/diastolic blood pressure (≤ 135/85 mmHg) compared with standard targets for blood pressure (≤ 140 to 160/90 to 100 mmHg).Participants were adults with documented hypertension and adults receiving treatment for hypertension with a cardiovascular history for myocardial infarction, stroke, chronic peripheral vascular occlusive disease, or angina pectoris. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed search results and extracted data using standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN
RESULTS: We included six RCTs that involved a total of 9484 participants. Mean follow-up was 3.7 years (range 1.0 to 4.7 years). All RCTs provided individual participant data.We found no change in total mortality (risk ratio (RR) 1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.23) or cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.29; moderate-quality evidence). Similarly, we found no differences in serious adverse events (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.08; low-quality evidence) or total cardiovascular events (including myocardial infarction, stroke, sudden death, hospitalization, or death from congestive heart failure) (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; low-quality evidence). Studies reported more participant withdrawals due to adverse effects in the lower target arm (RR 8.16, 95% CI 2.06 to 32.28; very low-quality evidence). Blood pressures were lower in the lower target group by 8.9/4.5 mmHg. More drugs were needed in the lower target group, but blood pressure targets were achieved more frequently in the standard target group. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of a difference in total mortality, serious adverse events, or total cardiovascular events between people with hypertension and cardiovascular disease treated to a lower or to a standard blood pressure target. This suggests that no net health benefit is derived from a lower systolic blood pressure target. We found very limited evidence on adverse events, which led to high uncertainty. At present, evidence is insufficient to justify lower blood pressure targets (≤ 135/85 mmHg) in people with hypertension and established cardiovascular disease. More trials are needed to examine this topic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027631      PMCID: PMC6513382          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010315.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  80 in total

1.  Treatment of hypertension in the prevention and management of ischemic heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council for High Blood Pressure Research and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Epidemiology and Prevention.

Authors:  Clive Rosendorff; Henry R Black; Christopher P Cannon; Bernard J Gersh; Joel Gore; Joseph L Izzo; Norman M Kaplan; Christopher M O'Connor; Patrick T O'Gara; Suzanne Oparil
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-05-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Aggressive blood pressure lowering is dangerous: the J-curve: con side of the arguement.

Authors:  Paolo Verdecchia; Fabio Angeli; Giovanni Mazzotta; Marta Garofoli; Gianpaolo Reboldi
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Lower blood pressure targets: to whom do they apply?

Authors:  Mattias Brunström; Bo Carlberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effects of individual risk factors on the incidence of cardiovascular events in the treated hypertensive patients of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study. HOT Study Group.

Authors:  A Zanchetti; L Hansson; B Dahlöf; D Elmfeldt; S Kjeldsen; R Kolloch; P Larochelle; G T McInnes; J M Mallion; L Ruilope; H Wedel
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Blood-pressure control for renoprotection in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease (REIN-2): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Piero Ruggenenti; Annalisa Perna; Giacomina Loriga; Maria Ganeva; Bogdan Ene-Iordache; Marta Turturro; Maria Lesti; Elena Perticucci; Ivan Nediyalkov Chakarski; Daniela Leonardis; Giovanni Garini; Adalberto Sessa; Carlo Basile; Mirella Alpa; Renzo Scanziani; Gianbattista Sorba; Carmine Zoccali; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Dogma disputed: can aggressively lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease be dangerous?

Authors:  Franz H Messerli; Giuseppe Mancia; C Richard Conti; Ann C Hewkin; Stuart Kupfer; Annette Champion; Rainer Kolloch; Athanase Benetos; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Reappraisal of European guidelines on hypertension management: a European Society of Hypertension Task Force document.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Stéphane Laurent; Enrico Agabiti-Rosei; Ettore Ambrosioni; Michel Burnier; Mark J Caulfield; Renata Cifkova; Denis Clément; Antonio Coca; Anna Dominiczak; Serap Erdine; Robert Fagard; Csaba Farsang; Guido Grassi; Hermann Haller; Antony Heagerty; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Wolfgang Kiowski; Jean Michel Mallion; Athanasios Manolis; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Peter Nilsson; Michael H Olsen; Karl Heinz Rahn; Josep Redon; José Rodicio; Luis Ruilope; Roland E Schmieder; Harry A J Struijker-Boudier; Pieter A Van Zwieten; Margus Viigimaa; Alberto Zanchetti
Journal:  Blood Press       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Jeff D Williamson; Mark A Supiano; William B Applegate; Dan R Berlowitz; Ruth C Campbell; Glenn M Chertow; Larry J Fine; William E Haley; Amret T Hawfield; Joachim H Ix; Dalane W Kitzman; John B Kostis; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Lenore J Launer; Suzanne Oparil; Carlos J Rodriguez; Christianne L Roumie; Ronald I Shorr; Kaycee M Sink; Virginia G Wadley; Paul K Whelton; Jeffrey Whittle; Nancy F Woolard; Jackson T Wright; Nicholas M Pajewski
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Effect of Standard vs Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cerebral Blood Flow in Small Vessel Disease: The PRESERVE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Iain D Croall; Daniel J Tozer; Barry Moynihan; Usman Khan; John T O'Brien; Robin G Morris; Victoria C Cambridge; Thomas R Barrick; Andrew M Blamire; Gary A Ford; Hugh S Markus
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 18.302

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Global Updates on Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Trends and Attribution of Traditional Risk Factors.

Authors:  Ram Jagannathan; Shivani A Patel; Mohammed K Ali; K M Venkat Narayan
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Considerations for optimal prescribing in older adults.

Authors:  Julia Bareham; Rae Petrucha; Michael MacFadden; Alex Crawley
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3. 

Authors:  Julia Bareham; Rae Petrucha; Michael MacFadden; Alex Crawley
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Application of omics in hypertension and resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Jiuqi Guo; Xiaofan Guo; Yingxian Sun; Zhao Li; Pengyu Jia
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.872

5.  Baseline and change in serum uric acid predict the progression from prehypertension to hypertension: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xue Tian; Anxin Wang; Yingting Zuo; Shuohua Chen; Dapeng Mo; Licheng Zhang; Shouling Wu; Yanxia Luo
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Variation in hypertension clinical practice guidelines: a global comparison.

Authors:  Richu Philip; Thomas Beaney; Nick Appelbaum; Carmen Rodriguez Gonzalvez; Charlotte Koldeweij; Amelia Kataria Golestaneh; Neil Poulter; Jonathan M Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 8.775

7.  Effects of wine on blood pressure, glucose parameters, and lipid profile in type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized interventional trials (PRISMA Compliant).

Authors:  Jianhua Ye; Xufeng Chen; Ligang Bao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Association of blood cobalt concentrations with dyslipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes in a US population: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hongxin Wang; Feng Li; Jianghua Xue; Yanshuang Li; Jiyu Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 202.731

10.  The blood pressure control and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular risk among Chinese community hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Shijun Liu; Hanyan Yuan; Caixia Jiang; Jue Xu; Xin Qiu; Jun Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.