Literature DB >> 30027281

Venous Thromboembolism Incidence and Prophylaxis Use After Gastrectomy Among Korean Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma: The PROTECTOR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yoon Ju Jung1, Ho Seok Seo1, Cho Hyun Park1, Hae Myung Jeon1, Ji-Il Kim2, Hyeon Woo Yim3, Kyo Young Song1.   

Abstract

Importance: The guidelines by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society for Clinical Oncology recommend the routine use of thromboprophylaxis for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. However, many physicians in Asian countries use venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis much less often because of the perceived lower VTE incidence in this population.
Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of postgastrectomy VTE in Korean patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, and to identify the complications and evaluate the efficacy and safety of VTE prevention methods. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Optimal Prophylactic Method for Venous Thromboembolism After Gastrectomy in Korean Patients (PROTECTOR) randomized clinical trial was conducted between August 1, 2011, and March 31, 2015. Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma presenting to a single center (Seoul St Mary's Hospital in Seoul, South Korea) were enrolled. Patients were randomized to either an intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC)-only group or an IPC+low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin sodium group. The data were analyzed on intention-to-treat and per protocol bases. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2016, to October 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Venous thromboembolism incidence was the primary outcome. Postoperative complications, particularly those associated with VTE prophylaxis methods, were the secondary end point.
Results: Of the 682 patients enrolled and randomized, 447 (65.5%) were male and 245 (34.5%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 57.67 (12.94) years. Among the 666 patients included in the analysis, the overall incidence of VTE was 2.1%. The incidence of VTE was statistically significantly higher in the IPC-only group compared with the IPC+LMW heparin group (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.05%-6.14% vs 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.17%-2.18%; P = .008). Among the 14 patients (2.1%) with VTE, 13 were asymptomatic and received a deep vein thrombosis diagnosis, whereas 1 patient received a symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism diagnosis. The overall incidence of bleeding complications was 5.1%. The incidence of bleeding complications was significantly higher in the IPC+LMW heparin group compared with the IPC-only group (9.1% vs 1.2%; P < .001). No cases of VTE-associated mortality were noted. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of IPC alone is inferior to the use of IPC+LMW heparin in preventing postoperative VTE. Because LMW heparin is associated with a high bleeding risk, further study is needed to stratify the patients at high risk for perioperative development of VTE. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01448746.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30027281      PMCID: PMC6233790          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.2081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  37 in total

Review 1.  Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in surgical patients.

Authors:  S Schulman; U Angerås; D Bergqvist; B Eriksson; M R Lassen; W Fisher
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 2.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Kari Bohlke; Anna Falanga
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Venous thromboembolism in the Chinese population--experience in a regional hospital in Hong Kong.

Authors:  H S Y Liu; B C S Kho; J C W Chan; F M F Cheung; K Y Lau; F P T Choi; W C Wu; T K Yau
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.227

4.  Incidence and risk factors of venous thromboembolism in colorectal surgery: does laparoscopy impart an advantage?

Authors:  Brian Buchberg; Hossein Masoomi; Kristelle Lusby; John Choi; Andrew Barleben; Cheryl Magno; John Lane; Ninh Nguyen; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06

Review 5.  Prophylaxis of postoperative thromboembolism with low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  L N Jørgensen; P Wille-Jørgensen; O Hauch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin in general and orthopaedic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M T Nurmohamed; F R Rosendaal; H R Büller; E Dekker; D W Hommes; J P Vandenbroucke; E Briët
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-07-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Optimal prophylactic method of venous thromboembolism for gastrectomy in Korean patients: an interim analysis of prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Kyo Young Song; Han Mo Yoo; Eun Young Kim; Ji-Il Kim; Hyeon Woo Yim; Hae Myung Jeon; Cho Hyun Park
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism following major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective epidemiological study in Japan.

Authors:  M Sakon; Y Maehara; H Yoshikawa; H Akaza
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.824

9.  Low molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: an experience from one Korean institute.

Authors:  Sung Ho Choi; Jung Ho Shim; Cho Hyun Park; Kyo Young Song
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 10.  Non-inferiority trials: are they inferior? A systematic review of reporting in major medical journals.

Authors:  Sunita Rehal; Tim P Morris; Katherine Fielding; James R Carpenter; Patrick P J Phillips
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Stavros Kakkos; George Kirkilesis; Joseph A Caprini; George Geroulakos; Andrew Nicolaides; Gerard Stansby; Daniel J Reddy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 2.  Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.

Authors:  Lara A Kahale; Charbel F Matar; Ibrahim Tsolakian; Maram B Hakoum; Maddalena Barba; Victor Ed Yosuico; Irene Terrenato; Francesca Sperati; Holger Schünemann; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-08

3.  American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.

Authors:  David R Anderson; Gian Paolo Morgano; Carole Bennett; Francesco Dentali; Charles W Francis; David A Garcia; Susan R Kahn; Maryam Rahman; Anita Rajasekhar; Frederick B Rogers; Maureen A Smythe; Kari A O Tikkinen; Adolph J Yates; Tejan Baldeh; Sara Balduzzi; Jan L Brożek; Itziar Etxeandia- Ikobaltzeta; Herman Johal; Ignacio Neumann; Wojtek Wiercioch; Juan José Yepes-Nuñez; Holger J Schünemann; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-12-10

4.  American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; Marc Carrier; Cihan Ay; Marcello Di Nisio; Lisa K Hicks; Alok A Khorana; Andrew D Leavitt; Agnes Y Y Lee; Fergus Macbeth; Rebecca L Morgan; Simon Noble; Elizabeth A Sexton; David Stenehjem; Wojtek Wiercioch; Lara A Kahale; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-02-23

5.  Impact of routine preoperative sonographic screening with early intervention for deep venous thrombosis in lower extremities on preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with gastric cancer scheduled for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Kazumitsu Suzuki; Susumu Shibasaki; Masaya Nakauchi; Kenichi Nakamura; Shingo Akimoto; Tsuyoshi Tanaka; Kenji Kikuchi; Kazuki Inaba; Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Impacts of the surgical safety checklist on postoperative clinical outcomes in gastrointestinal tumor patients: A single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Taohua Zheng; Dong Chen; Zhaojian Niu; Xiaobin Zhou; Shikuan Li; Yanbing Zhou; Shougen Cao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Incidence of venous thromboembolism after standard treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in Korea.

Authors:  Wonkyo Shin; Sanghee Lee; Myong Cheol Lim; Jipmin Jung; Hak Jin Kim; Hyunsoon Cho
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Neutrophil extracellular traps participate in the development of cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Cheng Li; Xiao-Ming Zou; Shi-Feng Yang; Jia-Qi Jin; Lei Zhu; Chang-Jian Li; Hao Yang; An-Ge Zhang; Tian-Qi Zhao; Chong-Yan Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.374

9.  Postoperative Thromboembolism According to the Type of Surgery: A Nationwide Study in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Ka-Won Kang; Ji Yoon Lee; Byung-Hyun Lee; Min Ji Jeon; Eun Sang Yu; Dae Sik Kim; Se Ryeon Lee; Chul Won Choi; Yong Park; Hwa Jung Sung; Byung Soo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.