| Literature DB >> 30027146 |
Kiandokht Kiani1,2, Mansoureh Movahedin3, Hossein Malekafzali4, Faramarz Mirfasihi5, Seyedeh Nargess Sadati6, Ashraf Moini7,2, SeyedNasser Ostad6, Reza Aflatoonian2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Establishment of a standardized animal endometriosis model is necessary for evaluation of new drug effects and for explaining different ethological aspects of this disease. For this purpose, we need a model which has more similarity to human endometriosis.Entities:
Keywords: Animal models; Autologous; Endometriosis; Estrus cycle; Transplantation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30027146 PMCID: PMC6046203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Reprod Biomed ISSN: 2476-3772
Figure 1Cytological assessment of vaginal smears stained by Crystal Violet (A) Proestrus: epithelial cells-mostly rounded but some cells showing early stages of cornification of approaching estrus (B) Estrus: large cornified cells in clumps (C) Metestrus: leucocytes with smaller numbers of non-nucleated epithelial cells (D) Diestrus: mainly leucocytes with small number of nucleated epithelial and cornified cells. Scale bars: 10 µm
Results of autologous endometriosis models induced into the peritoneal cavity of 52 NMRI mice according to different estrus stages at operation day
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proestrus / | Metestrus / | Proestrus / | Metestrus / | Proestrus / | Metestrus / | Proestrus / | Metestrus / | |
| 2 wk (n=13) | 25 ± 28.8 | 36.1 ± 32.8 | 0.7 ± 1.5 | 1.1 ± 1.3 | 7.5 ± 2.1 | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.7 |
| p-value | 0.529 | 0.741 | 0.121 | 1.00 | ||||
| 4 wk (n=13) | 50 ± 43.3 | 22.8 ± 29.1 | 2.1 ± 0.3 | 2 ± 1 | 5 ± 1.2 | 5.7 ± 0.6 | 2.2 ± 0.8 | 1.8 ± 0.3 |
| p-value | 0.219 | 0.864 | 0.427 | 0.453 | ||||
| 6 wk (n=13) | 35 ± 36.5 | 58 ± 13.3 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 7.6 ± 6.7 | 6.9 ± 2.3 | 2.05 ± 1 | 2.4 ± 0.8 |
| p-value | 0.173 | 0.840 | 0.851 | 0.562 | ||||
| 8 wk (n=13) | 39.3 ± 49.7 | 68.3 ± 19.1 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.54 | 6.7 ± 1.2 | 7.7 ± 4.8 | 2.4 ± 0.09 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
| p-value | 0.379 | 0.396 | 0.439 | 0.598 | ||||
Data are expressed as Mean ± S.D.
Mann Whitney u-test
Figure 2The cystic endometriotic lesion on the right lower quadrant of peritoneum, 6 wk after implantation
Figure 3H&E stained section of a cystic endometriotic peritoneal lesion, 6 wk after implantation, Magnification: 40×.
Figure 4(A–F) Immunofluorescent sections of endometriotic lesions at proestrus/estrus (A, C, E) or at metestrus/diestrus stages (B, D, F), by fixation of uterine tissue samples to the peritoneal wall; Sections were stained with DAPI to identify cell nuclei (blue), an antibody against the apoptosis marker Caspase-3 (red) (A-B); and an antibody against the proliferation marker Ki67 (red) (C-D); an antibody against CD31 for the detection of the microvascular endothelium (red) (E-F). Magnification: ×200.
Figure 5Caspase-3, Ki67 positive cells (%) and CD 31 positive micro vessels (%) in peritoneal endometriotic lesions at proestrus/ estrus (white bars) or metestrus/estrus (Grey bars) stages at operation day. Mean ± SEM.