Literature DB >> 30026855

ADAM10 Sheddase Activity is a Potential Lung-Cancer Biomarker.

Toshie Yoneyama1,2, Michael Gorry1,2, Andrea Sobo-Vujanovic1,2, Yan Lin3, Lazar Vujanovic4, Autumn Gaither-Davis4, Marcia L Moss5, Miles A Miller6, Linda G Griffith7, Douglas A Lauffenburger6,7, Laura P Stabile8, James Herman4, Nikola L Vujanovic1,9,2.   

Abstract

Background: Increases in expression of ADAM10 and ADAM17 genes and proteins are inconsistently found in cancer lesions, and are not validated as clinically useful biomarkers. The enzyme-specific proteolytic activities, which are solely mediated by the active mature enzymes, directly reflect enzyme cellular functions and might be superior biomarkers than the enzyme gene or protein expressions, which comprise the inactive proenzymes and active and inactivated mature enzymes.
Methods: Using a recent modification of the proteolytic activity matrix analysis (PrAMA) measuring specific enzyme activities in cell and tissue lysates, we examined the specific sheddase activities of ADAM10 (ADAM10sa) and ADAM17 (ADAM17sa) in human non-small cell lung-carcinoma (NSCLC) cell lines, patient primary tumors and blood exosomes, and the noncancerous counterparts.
Results: NSCLC cell lines and patient tumors and exosomes consistently showed significant increases of ADAM10sa relative to their normal, inflammatory and/or benign-tumor controls. Additionally, stage IA-IIB NSCLC primary tumors of patients who died of the disease exhibited greater increases of ADAM10sa than those of patients who survived 5 years following diagnosis and surgery. In contrast, NSCLC cell lines and patient tumors and exosomes did not display increases of ADAM17sa. Conclusions: This study is the first to investigate enzyme-specific proteolytic activities as potential cancer biomarkers. It provides a proof-of-concept that ADAM10sa could be a biomarker for NSCLC early detection and outcome prediction. To ascertain that ADAM10sa is a useful cancer biomarker, further robust clinical validation studies are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADAM10; ADAM17; Blood exosomes; Cancer biomarker; Fluorogenic peptide substrate; Lung cancer; Lysate; Proteolytic activity matrix analysis; Sheddase activity; Tumor tissue

Year:  2018        PMID: 30026855      PMCID: PMC6036891          DOI: 10.7150/jca.24601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Lung cancer (LC) is the second most frequent malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. It is a stealth disease that develops without symptoms, and is usually diagnosed in an advanced stage that cannot be successfully treated. Among LC patients, 85% have NSCLC, and among NSCLC patients, only 25% are diagnosed with the localized IA-IIB disease stages. These patients with the localized NSCLC are considered to have favorable prognosis, and are predominately treated with the conventional surgery alone. However, approximately 50% of these patients experience disease recurrence and die within 5 years after diagnosis and surgery 1. Biomarkers that could detect clinically hidden and discriminate aggressive and non-aggressive LC would enable diagnosis of the early, curable stages of disease in high risk populations (i.e., heavy smokers) and prediction of the disease outcome, respectively. Ultimately, the biomarkers would timely enable personalized effective treatments of the early-stage and aggressive LC. However, although several recent studies have indicated that specific signatures of microRNA expression could distinguish better- and worse-prognosis LC 2, no clinically validated biomarkers of LC are currently available. Biologically active molecules that are increased in cancer or stroma cells and mediate cancer-cell growth, survival, invasion and metastasis formation could be promising cancer biomarkers and therapy targets 3-7. ADAM10 (A disintegrin And Metalloproteinase 10) and ADAM17 are plasma-membrane anchored metalloproteinases that have such features 8, 9, being able to hydrolyze proximal to the cell surface, shed and activate ectodomains of transmembrane molecules that mediate epidermis growth, inflammation, and cancer pathogenesis, growth, invasion and metastasis formation 10-28. Increases in expression of ADAM10 and ADAM17 genes and/or proteins have been inconsistently found in cancer tissues, and have not been validated as clinically applicable biomarkers. 8-10, 28-41. The enzyme-specific proteolytic activities are solely mediated by the active (uninhibited) mature enzymes, which directly reflect the enzyme cellular functions and might be, therefore, superior biomarkers than the expression of enzyme genes or proteins comprising inactive proenzyme and active (uninhibited) and inactive (inhibited) mature enzyme forms 42, 43. Because ADAM10sa and ADAM17sa are directly associated with cancer pathogenesis and aggressive behavior, and a particular active form of ADAM10 is selectively displayed in cancer cells 44, the increased specific sheddase activities could be significant biomarkers of cancers 42. In the present study, using our recent modification of the high-throughput multiplex proteolytic activity matrix analysis (PrAMA) 45 that specifically measures ADAM10sa and ADAM17sa in cell and tissue lysates 46, we determined that ADAM10sa is consistently and selectively upregulated in NSCLC cell lines and patient primary tumors and circulating exosomes, and distinctly more upregulated in the primary tumors of patients having poor prognosis. These findings indicate that ADAM10sa could be a clinically useful early-detection and outcome-prediction biomarker of NSCLC.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

The FRET (Fluorescence-Resonance Energy Transfer) peptide substrates PEPDAB005, PEPDAB008, PEPDAB010, PEPDAB011, PEPDAB013, PEPDAB014 and PEPDAB022, which are based on the cleavage sites in specific proteins known to be processed by different ADAM family members 45, 46, were obtained from BioZyme Inc (Apex, NC). Recombinant ADAM10 and ADAM17 were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). EDTA-free non-MP protease inhibitor cocktails, tablets and Halt solution, were obtained from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, IN) and ThermoFisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA), respectively. Trypsin and enzyme-free cell-dissociation solution were obtained from GIBCO-Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY).

Cell lines and peripheral blood cells

NSCLC A549, H520, H596, H441, H358 and H2345, and small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) H69 cell lines were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). They were cultured in RPMI-1640 cell-culture medium supplemented with 10% FCS (GIBCO-Life Technologies). Human normal bronchial-epithelium (NHBE) cells, COPD bronchial-epithelium (COPDBE) cells and normal-lung fibroblasts (NLFB) were purchased from Lonza (Allendale, NJ). They were cultured in BEGMTM BulletKitTM medium (Lonza). The cell lines were kept stored in the frozen stocks, and cultured up to 6 passages, when needed for the experiments. Peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes (PBLs) were obtained using Phycoll-Hypaque (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo) density-gradient centrifugation of healthy-donor peripheral blood provided by the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Lung Cancer (LC) SPORE Tissue Bank (TB). Natural killer (NK) cells were purified from PBLs using Miltenyi Biotech (San Diego, CA) human NK-cell isolation kit 47. Dendritic cells (DCs) were generated from PBL monocytes, as previously described 48.

Tissues, plasma and sera

Ten pairs of NSCLC primary-tumor and tumor-free normal-lung tissues and 10 chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD) lung tissues preserved dry-snap-frozen; and 41 pairs of NSCLC primary-tumor and tumor-free normal-lung tissues, 25 NSCLC primary-tumor tissues without control-lung tissues, and 27 COPD-lung tissues, all preserved frozen in the RNA-protection solution RNAlater (Qiagen, Germantown, MD), were obtained surgically. All tumor and paired lung tissues were obtained from stage IA-IIB NSCLC patients. Tissues were verified by histopathology. Most of the tumors were adenocarcinomas (AD) and squamous cell carcinomas (SQ) (Table ). Plasma specimens (1 mL) were obtained from 5 healthy donors and 4 stage IA-IIB and 1 stage IIIB NSCLC tumor-bearing patients. Serum specimens (1 mL) were obtained from 7 healthy donors, 7 small-pulmonary-nodule (SPN) patients, 7 COPD patients and 6 stage IIIA and 1 stage IIIB NSCLC tumor-bearing patients (Table ). All the biological specimens were obtained, deidentified, stored frozen at -80oC, and provided by the UPMC-LC-SPORE-TB under the IRB-approved protocol REN16070229/IRB9502100. All tissue and blood donors were either active or former smokers.

Isolation of exosomes

The standard fractionated ultracentrifugation 49 and the newly developed size-defined filtration methods were used to isolate exosomes from peripheral blood plasma and sera, respectively. Plasma fractionated ultracentrifugation was performed by 20-min centrifugation at 2000 g, to remove platelets; filtration through 0.45 μm pore filter, to remove cell debris; and 40-min centrifugation at 100,000 g using 30% sucrose gradient, to pellet exosomes. The exosomes were washed twice in PBS by 60-min centrifugations at 100,000 g. Size-defined filtration was performed by passing sera through a stack of inter-connected 450, 220 and 20 nm pore-size ExoMir filters (Bioo Scientific Co., Austin, Tx). The first two filters retained cell debris and cell-derived particles larger than exosomes. The third 20 nm pore-size filter retained only exosomes and enabled complete removal of smaller particles and soluble blood proteins and washing of the retained exosomes using PBS. Exosomes are subsequently lysed and their active enzymes extracted in the 20 nm pore-size filter.

Preparation of cell, tissue and exosome lysates

All procedures were performed at 0oC 46. Single cell suspensions of viable cells were prepared from cultured adherent cells using the non-enzymatic cell-dissociation solution. Detached cells were washed twice in culture medium and three times in PBS. Frozen tissues were thawed on ice and washed three times in PBS. Cell and tissue lysates were prepared using a lysis buffer composed of 50 mM Tris-HCl/150 mM NaCl buffer supplemented with 0.1% SDS, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P40, 1% Triton X-100, and 1% EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Cells (106) were lysed in 50 μL of the lysis buffer for 1 h. Tissues (10-50 mg) were lysed by homogenization in 500 μl of the lysis buffer using the tissue-grinder system (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 1-h incubation. Exosomes obtained from 1 mL of peripheral blood plasma or sera were lysed in 200 or 500 μL of lysis buffer, respectively. The lysates were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 20 min, their supernatants were collected, and protein concentrations determined using Quick Start Bradford Dye Reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

ELISA

Human ADAM10 and ADAM17 ELISA kits were obtained from Antibodies Online Inc (Atlanta, GA) and R&D Systems, respectively. ELISAs were performed using 10 μg of lysates.

Metalloprotease enzyme activity assay

The assay was performed in 100 μL of assay-buffer solutions of 1 to 10 μg of cell-, tissue- or exosome-lysate proteins, or 10 ng of recombinant ADAM10 (rADAM10) or rADAM17 and supplemented with 10 μM PEPDAB substrates (BioZyme) 46. The assay buffer consisted 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8, supplemented with 0.1 mg/μL BSA, 0.0006% Brij-35, 1% glycerol, 0.5% Roche-tablet (Roche) and 0.5% ThermoFisher Scientific Halt (Halt) broad-spectrum protease inhibitor cocktails without EDTA. Totally processed substrate was obtained using 1% trypsin. The enzymatic reaction was induced by incubating the lysate/substrate solutions in 96-well white-wall, flat-bottom LUMITRAC-200 plates (Sigma Aldrich) at 37oC for 1 to 4 h. Fluorescence was measured in a TECAN-infinite-200-pro fluorimeter (Technical Communities, Inc., San Bruno, CA) using 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission wavelengths. The experiments were performed in duplicates or triplicates. The obtained data were computed using the formulas: 1) Experimental fluorescence-intensity gain (EFIG) = Experimental-sample mean fluorescence intensity (ESMFI) - Background-sample mean fluorescence intensity (BSMFI); 2) Trypsin-induced fluorescence-intensity gain (TIFIG) = Trypsin-sample mean fluorescence intensity (TSMFI) - BSMFI; 3) pM processed substrates = EFIG x 106/TIFIG.

Modified Proteolytic Activity Matrix Analysis (PrAMA)

The assay was performed as described before 45, 46. Briefly, PrAMA is an integrated mathematical modeling analysis that interprets dynamic signals from panels of moderately specific fluorogenic substrates to deduce a profile of specific MP-proteolytic activities. Deconvolution of enzyme signals from complex mixtures of proteases is accomplished by using individual MP-cleavage signatures for the substrate-panel measured with purified enzymes. The method relies upon the assumption that the total observed substrate cleavage is the linear sum of cleavage from all enzyme activities in a complex biological mixture. As a consequence of this assumption, a vector of specific enzyme activities, E, may be inferred from a signature of substrate cleavages, V, by solving the following equation: where [S] is the concentration of substrate, and C comprises a matrix of kinetic parameters that describes the efficiency (kcat/KM) with which particular enzymes cleave the substrates. The modified PrAMA was performed using systematically optimized and validated combinations of sensitivity (Syntherror) and specificity (Sigmathreshold) parameters to achieve maximal (100%) sensitivity and specificity with no cross-reactivity between rADAM10 and rADAM17, and lysates of wild-type and ADAM10- or ADAM17-knockout cells, control and ADAM10-cDNA-transfected ADAM10-knockout cells, control and ADAM10-siRNA- or ADAM17-siRNA-transfected NSCLC cells, and control and GI254023X-inhibited NSCLC-cell or -tissue lysates (46). Ten-thousand bootstrapping repetitions for each data-set were analyzed. The computation was performed using Matlab-2009a MathWorks (Natick, MA).

Statistics

Data were statistically evaluated using the SPSS-10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and R-3.3.2 (https://www.r-project.org) programs. Data are reported as means + standard deviation (SD) or standard error (STE), and medians, quartiles and ranges. Wilcoxon Sum-Rank tests and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests were used to compare two groups of independent and paired data, respectively. Pearson's coefficients were used to measure correlations. Linear-regression analysis with 95% confidence-band of the best fit line was performed to evaluate correlations. The receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to assess the ability of biomarkers to discriminate groups. The ROC curve, area under ROC (AUC), cutoff, sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and accuracy (AC) were evaluated. Optimal cutoffs were chosen using the maximized Youden Index (SE+SP-1). To avoid over-fitting of the data, a 10-fold cross-validation was used to estimate the predictive values of models. Most of the tests were two-sided. The one-sided tests were indicated in the figure legends. p values <0.05 were considered significant.

Results

ADAM10sa is upregulated in cultured lung cancer cells

A cancer biomarker candidate should be significantly different in cancerous and non-cancerous cells. Therefore, we initially tested the levels of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins and sheddase activities in NSCLC, normal lung, COPD lung and inflammatory cells. All the tested cells, including NSCLC, NHBE, COPDBE (NHBE-COPDBE), DCs and PBLs (DC-PBL), contained substantial amounts of ADAM10 and ADAM17 proteins as measured by ELISA (Figs. ). ADAM10 and ADAM17 protein levels were marginally decreased in NSCLC cells relative to NHBE-COPDBE cells and DC-PBL, respectively. In contrast, the processing of PEPDAB005, 010, 011, 014 and 022 substrates was significantly increased in NSCLC-cell lysates relative to the non-cancerous NHBE-NHFB-COPDBE-cell and DC-PBL lysates (Fig. ). Subsequently, PrAMA inferred from these findings that ADAM10sa was also significantly increased in NSCLC-cell lysates relative to NHBE-NLFB-COPDBE-cell (p=0.008) and DC-PBL (p=0.036) lysates (Fig. ). Contrarily, ADAM17sa was marginally decreased in NSCLC-cell and DC-PBL lysates relative to NHBE-NLFB-COPDBE cell lysates (Fig. ). These findings show that ADAM10sa, but not ADAM10 and ADAM17 protein expression or ADAM17sa, is increased in NSCLC cells. They also indicate that the protein expression and sheddase activity of either ADAM10 or ADAM17 do not correlate in the examined cells.

ADAM10sa is upregulated in NSCLC tumors

In order to determine whether ADAM10sa and/or ADAM17sa are upregulated in tumors and are potential NSCLC biomarkers, we comparatively examined these enzymes in paired stage IA-IIB NSCLC primary tumors and cancer-free lung tissues. Such tissue specimens were available cryopreserved either dry or in RNAlater. Using smaller tissue cohorts (n=10), we first determined that tissues stored either way consistently displayed significant amounts of ADAM10sa and ADAM17sa. The obtained data also indicated that ADAM10sa might be upregulated in NSCLC tumors (Supplementary Fig. ). More detailed PrAMA of multiple enzymes showed that MMP2 activity (MMP2a) and MMP14a, but not MMP9a (Supplementary Figs. ), MMP1a or ADAM9sa (data not shown), might be also upregulated in NSCLC primary tumors relative to COPD and normal lungs. However, among the examined specific enzyme activities, ADAM10sa appeared to be highly superior, being more than 100-, 40- and 30-fold higher than the MMP and ADAM17 activities in NSCLC tumors, COPD lungs and normal lungs, respectively (Supplementary Fig. ). Next, we investigated ADAM10 and ADAM17 protein expression and sheddase activity in lysates of larger cohorts of paired NSCLC tumor and cancer-free normal lung (n=31) and COPD lung (n=27) specimens cryopreserved in RNAlater (Fig. ). We found that ADAM10 protein levels were inconsistently and moderately increased in NSCLC primary tumors relative to normal or COPD lungs (p=0.002-0.005), while ADAM17 protein expression levels were similar in these tissues (Figs. ). In contrast, the NSCLC tumor lysates processed significantly better PEPDAB005, 008, 011, 013 and 022 than normal or COPD lung lysates (Fig. ). Notably, PEPDAB005 processing was especially increased in tumor lysates (Figs. ). Consequently, PrAMA inferred from these findings that ADAM10sa was highly significantly increased in tumors relative to the low enzyme activity in normal and COPD lungs (p<0.0001, Fig. ). In contrast, ADAM17sa was similar in the tumors and non-cancerous lungs (Fig. ). Importantly, PEPDAB005 processing and the most dominant enzyme activity, ADAM10sa, significantly correlated in NSCLC tumor lysates (Fig. ), indicating that the PEPDAB005 processing was mostly mediated by ADAM10sa. Furthermore, ROC-curve analyses showed that both PEPDAB005 processing (Fig. ) and ADAM10sa (Fig. ) could distinguish NSCLC tumors from non-cancerous normal or COPD lungs with significant and similar sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP) and accuracy (AC) [(PEPDAB005 processing: SE=0.83, 0.91; SP=0.83, 0.93; AC=0.83, 0.92), (ADAM10sa: SE=0.75, 0.71; SP=0.94, 0.89; AC=0.84, 0.79), respectively]. These findings show that ADAM10sa is significantly upregulated in NSCLC tumors, and is, therefore, a potential biomarker that could discriminate cancerous and non-cancerous lung tissues. They also indicate that PEPDAB005 processing could be an ADAM10sa-surrogate marker in NSCLC tumors.

ADAM10sa may be more upregulated in NSCLC tumors of poor-prognosis patients

About 50% of patients diagnosed with the localized NSCLC (stage IA-IIB) die within 5 years after initial diagnosis and surgical therapy. Since ADAM10 plays key roles in cancer pathogenesis, invasion and metastases formation 10, 28, we examined whether the levels of ADAM10 protein and ADAM10sa-surrogate marker PEPDAB005 processing are more increased in primary tumors of NSCLC patients who died (n=17) from the disease relative to those who survived (n=18) 5 years after diagnosis and therapy (Fig. ). ADAM10 protein levels were inconsistently and marginally increased (p=0.039) in tumor lysates of NSCLC patients who died relative to those who survived (Fig. ). Importantly, PEPDAB005 processing was highly significantly increased (p<0.0001) in tumor lysates of patients who died relative to those who survived (Fig. ). ROC curve analysis showed that the PEPDAB005 processing could distinguish with significant sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (SE=0.94, SP=0.78, AC=0.86) NSCLC tumors of patients having poor prognosis from those having good prognosis (Fig. ). These findings strongly indicate that ADAM10sa is more elevated in primary tumors of NSCLC patients having poor prognosis than in those of patients having good prognosis.

ADAM10sa is increased on blood exosomes of tumor-bearing NSCLC patients

Cancer cells produce in tumor microenvironment and release into peripheral blood large amounts of microvesicles (30 to 100 nm in diameter), named exosomes 50. Exosomes are derivatives of and structurally related to endosomes. They are morphologically defined by a limiting membrane expressing on its external surface plasma-membrane-bound molecules, and could be a good source of cell-surface biomarkers 50-54. Since ADAM10 and ADAM17 are plasma-membrane integral molecules, they are likely expressed on exosomes too. Initially, we determined that unfractionated human sera of tumor-bearing patients and control individuals similarly processed PEPDAB substrates masking the specific enzymatic activity of exosomes that were greatly diluted in their natural environment (data not shown). Therefore, we performed the investigation using purified peripheral-blood plasma and serum exosomes. First, we assessed the presence of ADAM10sa and ADAM17sa in plasma exosomes obtained by the standard fractionated ultra-centrifugation (Figs. . Plasmas were acquired from tumor-bearing stage IA-IIB NSCLC patients and healthy individuals. Exosome lysates were simultaneously tested with five PEPDAB substrates. We found that the exosome lysates of NSCLC patients significantly better processed only PEPDAB005 than those of healthy individuals (p=0.024, Fig. ). Consequently, PrAMA inferred that NSCLC-patient exosomes contained increased ADAM10sa (Fig. and unchanged ADAM17sa (Supplementary Fig. ), relative to healthy-individual exosomes. Remarkably, PEPDAB005 processing and ADAM10sa significantly correlated in NSCLC-patient exosome lysates (Fig. ). These findings indicated that the enzyme activity measured in NSCLC-patient exosomes by PEPDAB005 processing was mostly ADAM10sa. Furthermore, ROC-curve analysis suggested that both PEPDAB005 processing and ADAM10sa could distinguish with significant and equal sensitivity, specificity and accuracy NSCLC tumor-bearing patients from healthy individuals (SE=0.80, SP=1.00, AC=0.90) (Fig. ). These data indicated that ADAM10sa, but not ADAM17sa, was selectively increased in exosomes of NSCLC tumor-bearing patients. They also suggested that ADAM10sa could be effectively quantified in NSCLC-patient blood exosomes by testing only PEPDAB005 processing. The exosome purification with the fractionated ultra-centrifugation is complex, labor-intensive and time-consuming, and could limit the potential routine clinical investigation of the exosome biomarkers in numerous blood specimens. Therefore, we introduced a simple and rapid size-defined filtration method to isolate exosomes. This method enabled consistent isolation of 500 to 1300 μg of microvesicles from 1 mL serum. In addition, as PEPDAB005 processing closely correlated with ADAM10sa both in NSCLC tumors and patient exosomes (Figs. ), it was applied as ADAM10sa-surrogate marker in the further studies of exosomes. Using the simplified method, we could simultaneously assess 28 specimens of serum exosomes obtained from NSCLC tumor-bearing patients (n=7), healthy individuals (n=7), and COPD (n=7) and SPN (n=7) patients (Fig. ). We found that exosome lysates of NSCLC-patient processed significantly better PEPDAB005 than those of healthy individuals (p=0.0021), or SPN (p=0.0021) and COPD (p=0.0087) patients. ROC-curve analysis showed that the ADAM10sa-surrogate assay could distinguish NSCLC tumor-bearing patients from healthy individuals, or SPN and COPD patients with significant sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (SE: 1.0, 1.0, 1.0; SP: 1.0, 1.0, 0.72; AC: 1.0, 1.0, 0.86, respectively). These findings strongly indicated that ADAM10sa was selectively increased on exosomes of NSCLC tumor-bearing patients and, therefore, could represent a significant NSCLC-detection biomarker capable of accurately distinguishing NSCLC-tumor-bearing patients not only from healthy individuals but also from patients having inflammatory or benign-tumor pulmonary diseases. The findings also suggested that the PEPDAB005 processing could be an ADAM10sa-surrogate marker of NSCLC-patient exosomes.

Discussion

The expressed genes and proteins of cancer pathogenesis and aggressiveness contributing enzymes ADAM10 and ADAM17 have been explored as potential cancer biomarkers. The enzyme markers were frequently found increased in malignant tumors or patient blood, but the increases were not consistent or robust, and were not clinically validated as cancer biomarkers 3-9, 29, 32-36, 38-40, 51-54. We provide herein the evidences that ADAM10sa is moderately increased in NSCLC cells, highly increased in NSCLC primary tumors, further increased in NSCLC aggressive tumors, and notably increased in blood exosomes of tumor-bearing NSCLC patients. The enzyme activity was consistently high in NSCLC primary tumors and consistently low in the control tissues, indicating that it may be a significant NSCLC biomarker. In contrast, the ADAM10-protein expression was inconsistently, moderately or marginally increased in NSCLC primary tumors and largely overlapped with the enzyme expression levels in the control tissues, confirming that ADAM10-protein expression may be a poor NSCLC biomarker. ADAM10 sheds and activates ErbB, Eph and Notch, which subsequently trigger key signaling pathways of cancer initiation, progression, invasion and metastases formation 8, 10, 12-18, 55-57. In solid tumors, hypoxia develops and enhances ADAM10 expression and activity of cancer cells via induction and accumulation of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1α (HIF-1α) 58. These findings concur with ours and explain why ADAM10 protein expression is not increased in normoxic cultured NSCLC cells, but is increased in hypoxic NSCLC tumor tissues. The hypoxia-upregulated ADAM10 renders cancer cells resistant to innate immunity by increasing shedding of the NK-cell activating ligand MICA from cancer-cell surface. The hypoxia induction of ADAM10 could be partially inhibited by the anti-hypoxia treatment with nitric oxide mimetics, indicating a potentially new anti-cancer therapy 58. Contrasting ADAM10 protein expression, ADAM10sa is moderately increased in cultured NSCLC cells and highly increased in NSCLC primary tumors. These findings could not be simply explained by the hypoxia-induced enhancement of ADAM10 expression 58. Recent studies have shown that cancer cells both in culture and in tumor, but not non-transformed cells, express a large, unprocessed, active form of ADAM10 (having occupied catalytic-domain active site with prodomain). This tumor form of ADAM10 is activated by disulfide isomerization in its membrane-proximal cysteine-reach substrate-recognition domain, which is mediated by reactive oxygen radicals highly produced in tumor microenvironment 44. Thus, it is conceivable that the tumor form of ADAM10 is selectively expressed by NSCLC cells and both upregulated by hypoxia and activated by oxygen radicals in NSCLC-tumor microenvironment thus resulting in the excessive ADAM10sa found in NSCLC primary tumors and especially in their aggressive species obtained from poor-prognosis patients. Using the specific enzyme activity assay that employs both processing of multiple fluorogenic substrates and PrAMA, we detected significant ADAM10sa increases in peripheral blood exosomes of NSCLC patients bearing relatively small, T1 or T2 primary tumors, indicating that the increased ADAM10sa in peripheral blood exosomes could be an early detection biomarker of NSCLC. As PrAMA-ADAM10sa is the most dominant MP activity in NSCLC tumors that closely correlates with PEPDAB005 processing in both NSCLC tumors and exosomes of NSCLC tumor-bearing patients, the single substrate processing could be alone an ADAM10sa-surrogate marker in NSCLC tumors and, especially, in NSCLC-patient blood exosomes having a less complex enzyme composition. Indeed, the one-substrate assay detected in exosomes of tumor-bearing NSCLC patients the elevation of enzyme activity with the same accuracy as the five-substrate PrAMA-ADAM10sa. These findings indicate that PEPDAB005 processing alone could be a simple, sensitive and inexpensive blood test, which could be applied in early detection and follow-up studies of NSCLC, when large cohorts of blood exosome specimens are simultaneously tested or the quantities of isolated exosomes are insufficient for the full-scale, multiple-substrate PrAMA-ADAM10sa examination. Having the key roles in all phases of cancer development 8, 10, 12-18, 55-57, ADAM10 has been considered not only a potentially significant cancer biomarker but also a highly promising therapy target 10, 59. However, numerous clinical trials with broad-spectrum small-molecule inhibitors of MP catalytic-domain active sites implemented in patients with advanced cancers have so far failed, showing major musculosclerotic toxicity and no clinical benefits 60, 61. Subsequent studies have indicated that the causes of the promising therapy failure could be the non-selective inhibition of both cancer-promoting (i.e., MMP2, MMP9, MMP14, ADAM10, ADAM17) and cancer-suppressing (i.e., MMP3, MMP8, MMP12) MP activities, lack of inhibition of the proteolytic-activity independent cancer-promoting functions of MPs mediated by the beyond catalytic domain exosites, and dose-limiting toxicity 61-63. Therefore, more selective small-molecule inhibitors targeting catalytic-domain active sites, mutated TIMP variants with improved selectivity and affinity, and specific antibodies targeting both catalytic and non-catalytic functions of pro-tumorigenic MMPs and ADAM10 have been developed 61-63. Preclinical studies of the new-generation inhibitors provide highly promising proofs-of-principle that anti-cancer therapies with more specific MP inhibitors could be clinically beneficial 44, 61-66. This was exemplified by the findings that the small-molecule MP inhibitor INCB3619, selectively targeting ADAM10, ADAM17, MMP2 and MMP12, effectively reduced shedding of ErbB ligands and retained growth of human cancer xenografts in nude mice without inducing fibroplasia toxicity 66. More importantly, the specific targeting of the cancer-prevalent active form of ADAM10 with a monoclonal antibody led to inhibition of Notch signaling, tumor growth and tumor regrowth after chemotherapy in murine models 44. The potential future anti-ADAM10 therapy as well as other current and future therapies of NSCLC could be personalized and made more beneficial by the ADAM10sa-biomarker-based early detection, outcome prediction and follow-up. In conclusion, our study provides a proof-of-concept that the increased ADAM10sa in primary tumor lesions and blood exosomes could be a significant prognostic, early detection and follow-up biomarker of NSCLC and perhaps some other cancers. ADAM10sa could be also a companion marker to enroll patients into future therapies that target ADAM10. To confirm our findings and validate ADAM10sa as a clinically useful NSCLC biomarker, additional retrospective and prospective studies of large cohorts of tissue and blood specimens are required. Supplementary figures. Click here for additional data file.
Table 1

Essential demographic, clinical and pathologic information for tumor tissues, plasma and sera

PlasmaSera
TumorsNSCLCHealthyNSCLCSPNCOPDHealthy
Age (years)
<6019223333
>6047334444
Gender
Male35335555
Female31222222
Stage
IA172
IIA4
IIIA16
IB261
IIB181
IIIB11
Histological type
Squamous2131
Adeno3712
Adeno-Squamous314
Large cell5
Tumor size
T12123
T2-T34534
Lymph node metastases
Negative4234
Positive2423
Outcome during 6 years
Died1743
Alive1814
  63 in total

1.  Adam meets Eph: an ADAM substrate recognition module acts as a molecular switch for ephrin cleavage in trans.

Authors:  Peter W Janes; Nayanendu Saha; William A Barton; Momchil V Kolev; Sabine H Wimmer-Kleikamp; Eva Nievergall; Carl P Blobel; Juha-Pekka Himanen; Martin Lackmann; Dimitar B Nikolov
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  ADAMs (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) messenger RNA expression in Helicobacter pylori-infected, normal, and neoplastic gastric mucosa.

Authors:  Tetsuro Yoshimura; Toshihiko Tomita; Michael F Dixon; Anthony T R Axon; Philip A Robinson; Jean E Crabtree
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Expression of members of the novel membrane linked metalloproteinase family ADAM in cells derived from a range of haematological malignancies.

Authors:  E Wu; P I Croucher; N McKie
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1997-06-18       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Increased expression of ADAM family members in human breast cancer and breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Uwe Lendeckel; Jana Kohl; Marco Arndt; Stacy Carl-McGrath; Hans Donat; Christoph Röcken
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Prognostic impact of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in operable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Wulf Sienel; Joe Hellers; Alicia Morresi-Hauf; Ralf Lichtinghagen; Wolf Mutschler; Marianne Jochum; Christoph Klein; Bernward Passlick; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  The disintegrin/metalloprotease ADAM 10 is essential for Notch signalling but not for alpha-secretase activity in fibroblasts.

Authors:  Dieter Hartmann; Bart de Strooper; Lutgarde Serneels; Katleen Craessaerts; An Herreman; Wim Annaert; Lieve Umans; Torben Lübke; Anna Lena Illert; Kurt von Figura; Paul Saftig
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Increased mRNA expression of ADAMs in renal cell carcinoma and their association with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Roemer; Lutz Schwettmann; Monika Jung; Jan Roigas; Glen Kristiansen; Dietmar Schnorr; Stefan A Loening; Klaus Jung; Ralf Lichtinghagen
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  An essential role for ectodomain shedding in mammalian development.

Authors:  J J Peschon; J L Slack; P Reddy; K L Stocking; S W Sunnarborg; D C Lee; W E Russell; B J Castner; R S Johnson; J N Fitzner; R W Boyce; N Nelson; C J Kozlosky; M F Wolfson; C T Rauch; D P Cerretti; R J Paxton; C J March; R A Black
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Modification of proteolytic activity matrix analysis (PrAMA) to measure ADAM10 and ADAM17 sheddase activities in cell and tissue lysates.

Authors:  Toshie Yoneyama; Michael Gorry; Miles A Miller; Autumn Gaither-Davis; Yan Lin; Marcia L Moss; Linda G Griffith; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Laura P Stabile; James G Herman; Nikola L Vujanovic
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.207

Review 10.  Therapeutic Potential of Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibition in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Evette S Radisky; Maryam Raeeszadeh-Sarmazdeh; Derek C Radisky
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 4.429

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Message in the bottle: regulation of the tumor microenvironment via exosome-driven proteolysis.

Authors:  Agathe Quesnel; Amy Broughton; George S Karagiannis; Panagiota S Filippou
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 2.  Extracellular vesicles and particles impact the systemic landscape of cancer.

Authors:  Serena Lucotti; Candia M Kenific; Haiying Zhang; David Lyden
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 14.012

3.  Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) Improves Cognitive Deficits Aggravated by an Obesogenic Diet Through Modulation of Unfolded Protein Response in APPswe/PS1dE9 Mice.

Authors:  Miren Ettcheto; Amanda Cano; Patricia R Manzine; Oriol Busquets; Ester Verdaguer; Rubén Dario Castro-Torres; Maria Luisa García; Carlos Beas-Zarate; Jordi Olloquequi; Carme Auladell; Jaume Folch; Antoni Camins
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 4.  Extracellular Vesicles and Matrix Remodeling Enzymes: The Emerging Roles in Extracellular Matrix Remodeling, Progression of Diseases and Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Muhammad Nawaz; Neelam Shah; Bruna Riedo Zanetti; Marco Maugeri; Renata Nacasaki Silvestre; Farah Fatima; Luciano Neder; Hadi Valadi
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Higher CXCL16 exodomain is associated with aggressive ovarian cancer and promotes the disease by CXCR6 activation and MMP modulation.

Authors:  Hina Mir; Gurpreet Kaur; Neeraj Kapur; Sejong Bae; James W Lillard; Shailesh Singh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  MiR-449a regulates the cell migration and invasion of human non-small cell lung carcinoma by targeting ADAM10.

Authors:  Haining Meng; Qiao Huang; Xijin Zhang; Jiawei Huang; Ruowu Shen; Bei Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Lactobacillus gasseri Suppresses the Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Helicobacter pylori-Infected Macrophages by Inhibiting the Expression of ADAM17.

Authors:  Hanna G Gebremariam; Khaleda Rahman Qazi; Tanvi Somiah; Sushil Kumar Pathak; Hong Sjölinder; Eva Sverremark Ekström; Ann-Beth Jonsson
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  ADAM10 promotes cell growth, migration, and invasion in osteosarcoma via regulating E-cadherin/β-catenin signaling pathway and is regulated by miR-122-5p.

Authors:  Quan Yuan; Honghao Yu; Jianhua Chen; Xiaoyu Song; Li Sun
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 9.  Isolation and characterization of exosomes for cancer research.

Authors:  Le Zhu; Hao-Ting Sun; Shun Wang; Sheng-Lin Huang; Yan Zheng; Chao-Qun Wang; Bei-Yuan Hu; Wei Qin; Tian-Tian Zou; Yan Fu; Xiao-Tian Shen; Wen-Wei Zhu; Yan Geng; Lu Lu; Hu-Liang Jia; Lun-Xiu Qin; Qiong-Zhu Dong
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  CircNFIX Acts as a miR-212-3p Sponge to Enhance the Malignant Progression of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Up-Regulating ADAM10.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Ying Zhu; Youfa Qin; Yikai Chen
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.