Literature DB >> 30026829

Enhancer RNAs (eRNAs): New Insights into Gene Transcription and Disease Treatment.

Mengting Ding1,2, Yuhan Liu1,3, Xinhui Liao3, Hengji Zhan1,3, Yuchen Liu3, Weiren Huang3.   

Abstract

Enhancers are cis-acting elements that have the ability to increase the expression of target genes. Recent studies have shown that enhancers can act as transcriptional units for the production of enhancer RNAs (eRNAs), which are hallmarks of activity enhancers and are involved in the regulation of gene transcription. The in-depth study of eRNAs is of great significance for us to better understand enhancer function and transcriptional regulation in various diseases. Therefore, eRNAs may be a potential therapeutic target for diseases. Here, we review the current knowledge of the characteristics of eRNAs, the molecular mechanisms of eRNAs action, as well as diseases related to dysregulation of eRNAs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Associated diseases; Enhancer RNAs; Enhancers; Gene transcription

Year:  2018        PMID: 30026829      PMCID: PMC6036709          DOI: 10.7150/jca.25829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

According to whether it carries the information encoding the proteins, RNA molecules in vivo could be divided into two categories - messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs)1. The GENCODE consortium has discovered that non-protein coding regions (more than 98%) vastly outnumber the protein coding regions in the human genome2, 3. It is possible to reveal a novel RNA-mediated genetic information regulatory network to annotate and elucidate the structure and function of the biological genome at an angle different from that of protein-coding genes. The enhancer element was first observed when a 72bp-long DNA fragment located upstream of simian virus SV40 early genes significantly increased the expression of β-globin gene4. Subsequent decades of research have made enhancers well be annotated. Enhancers are cis-regulatory elements that bind to specific transcription factors to enhance corresponding gene transcription regardless of their orientation and location relative to the promoters5. It is generally believed that enhancers are highly conserved sequences, essential for developmental regulatory gene expression and tissue specificity6, 7. Enhancers possess some classic epigenetic features, including in histone modifications (such as, histone 3 Lysine 4 monomethylation, H3K4me1; histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation, H3K27ac), histone variants (such as, H2AZ, H3.3), co-activators (such as, Mediator complex) and an open chromatin architectures (such as, DNase I hypersensitivity) that facilitates interaction with transcriptional regulators6, 8-11. The development of sequencing technology has identified more than 400,000 enhancers based on the above characteristics3, 12, 13. In 2010, two remarkable studies demonstrated that a subset of enhancers were occupied by RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) and transcribed into a class of ncRNAs termed enhancer RNAs (eRNAs)14, 15. Subsequently, more and more eRNA-producing enhancer regions have been confirmed and eRNAs seem to play a noticeable role in gene transcriptional regulation. Although we have not yet fully understood the molecular mechanisms of eRNAs and their roles in gene transcription, mounting evidence suggests that the abnormal expressions of eRNAs are closely related to various human diseases. This article reviews the latest advances in eRNAs research to provide a reference for further study.

Features of eRNAs

Enhancers could respond to various stimuli (e.g., estrogen; androgen) to generate eRNAs16-18. They are often appeared quickly after induction, with a peak in about 1 hour, then declined rapidly15. In early stages of research, it was generally believed that eRNAs were 5'capped, unstable, short, usually nonpolyadenylated and unspliced and had short half-lives which were completely different from long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs)11, 16, 19-21. The length of lncRNA is usually greater than 200 nucleotides (nt). Non-coding RNA-activating (ncRNA-a) is a set of lncRNA that possess enhancer-like function22. However, later research shows the boundaries between eRNAs and lncRNAs are not so absolute. Paralkar et al.23 confirmed that a 434nt-long lncRNA named Locked was actually an eRNA by exploring the effect on relevant gene expression after deleting its genomic region or terminating its transcription. They discovered the transcription start site (TSS) of Locked physically interacted with the promoter of related genes like an enhancer element. Brazao et al.24 classified a portion of lncRNAs in B-lymphocytes as eRNAs by combining chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays with sequencing (ChIP-seq). Briefly, eRNAs have been universally discovered in a variety of cell lineages. As enhancers tend to be tissue-specific, eRNAs derived from the same enhancer across tissues may be different25 and the same stimulation could induce the production of various eRNAs through diversified signaling pathways26. Kim et al.14 showed that not all, but only about half of the intergenic enhancers could be transcribed into eRNAs and another study indicated only 30% of typical enhancer regions overlapped with eRNAs27. Pulakanti et al.28 demonstrated the increase of H3K27ac, abundant DNA hydroxylase Tet1 and DNA hypomethylation are the signatures of eRNA-generating enhancers. Dorighi et al.29 indicated that histone methyltransferases Mll3 and Mll4 are essential for RNAP II accumulation at enhancers to activate transcription. Loss of Mll3/4 from enhancers decreased the binding rate of RNAP II and thus eRNA production. Other studies have suggested condensins could modulate the binding of co-repressors or co-activators (like p300 and RIP140) by the recruitment of an E3 ubiquitin ligase to regulate eRNA transcription30. Zhu et al.31 conducted a logistic regression model and revealed that a group of four chromatin modifications was adequate to exactly estimate eRNA transcription. Rahman et al.32 showed that eRNAs were merely located in the nucleus and possessed similar dynamics as target mRNAs when was stimulated by estrogen in MCF-7 cells. However, Heward et al26 demonstrated eRNAs were not limited to the nucleus, suggesting the function of eRNAs may not only be cis-mediated and some eRNAs may play a role in the cytoplasm. Multiple studies showed eRNAs transcription and enhancer-promoter looping (E:P looping) took precedence over the transcriptional activation of target genes33, 34. Similarly, enhancer transcription was also prior to the methylation of the histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me)35. The promoter and enhancer activity of the interferon-β gene (IFNB1) were completely preserved in the absence of eRNAs produced by viral inducible enhancer L236. Blocking the production of eRNAs by flavopiridol did not affect the function of enhancers, indicating that the loading of active enhancers happened before eRNA synthesis16.

Function of eRNAs

eRNAs are hallmarks of active enhancers

A study of estrogen-associated eRNAs showed transcriptional enhancers possessed epigenetic characteristics as we mentioned above, however, these characteristics were not observed in the absence of eRNAs16. The presence of eRNAs can distinguish whether the enhancer is active or silent25, 37. Wu et al.38 demonstrated that the presence of tissue-specific eRNAs was a hallmark of active enhancers and they could be available to forecast the corresponding enhancers independent of known epigenetic markers through RNA sequencing. Zhu et al.31 compared the ability of H3K27ac and eRNA transcription to predict enhancer activity and revealed the latter was more representative. Sandor et al.39 determined whether the enhancers were functional by measuring the production of eRNAs in thymocytes. Previous study showed P53 regulated hundreds of eRNAs and Leveille et al. localized p53-regulated enhancers by eRNA production40, 41.

eRNAs involved in transcriptional regulation of target genes

The function of eRNAs was controversial at an early stage, whether they were merely by-products of transcription events under high concentrations of RNAP II or indeed played a critical role in transcriptional activation. In recent years mounting studies suggests that eRNAs play a functional role in orchestrating gene expression which allows for the regulation of multiple gene expression through one gene binding site42. Large-scale analysis demonstrated a positive correlation between the expression level of eRNAs and target43 or nearby genes14, 20. p53-bound enhancer regions (p53BERs) which is necessary for transcriptional enhancement produced eRNAs in a p53 dependent way42. Knockdown of eRNAs by siRNAs or LNAs or terminating transcription of corresponding enhancers by drugs would decrease the target gene expression16, 17, 21. A large body of functional genomic data over the past few years had brought substantial evidence that eRNAs worked through diverse pathways to regulate gene transcription.

eRNAs act on RNAP II with multiple means

eRNAs were synthesized prior to the target gene transcription and interact with the negative elongation factor (NELF) complex as a decoy to release the paused RNAP II to trigger transcription. Knockdown of eRNAs blocked the efficiently release of NELF, which was consistent with the decrease in mRNA expression, but had no effect on the enhancer-promoter looping34, 44. In addition, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) eRNA activated positive transcription elongation factor (P-TEFb) by binding to CYCLIN T1, and then increased phosphorylation of serine-2 of RNAP II to facilitate target gene transcription45. Other knockdown studies of eRNAs have also demonstrated that eRNAs may facilitate RNAP II recruitment specifically to the gene promoter of the myogenic differentiation antigen (MyoD)46. eRNA E2-3 derived from the distal enhancer of heme oxygenase-1 gene human (HO-1) selectively regulated HO-1 gene induction by affecting RNAP II binding to enhancer regions and the promoter47. In conclusion, eRNAs may not only be the products, but also the reason for the high concentration of RNAP II occupied by enhancers46.

Enhancer-promoter looping (E:P looping)

Enhancers could physically interact with promoters to form E:P looping, thereby regulating gene expression independent of distance and orientation48, 49. Studies have shown that inducible eRNAs are extensively transcribed by short treatments with AR or ER, thus strengthening specific E:P looping to upregulate relevant coding genes selectively17. Huang et al.50 discovered that eRNA-driven looping enhanced the expression of the lncRNA DHRS4-AS1. Interactions of enhancers with promoters of the gonadotropin gene are lost after eRNA knockout51. The E:P looping is mediated at least in part by mediator complex and cohesins17, 18, 22, 52. But single-cell profiling demonstrated that accumulation of eRNAs at chromosomal looping was not essential for mRNA continuous transcription32.

Histone modifications

Creb-binding protein (CBP) interacts with a large number of transcription factors to form transcriptional regulatory networks, allowing for the recruitment of almost all enhancers53. This makes CBP one of the hallmarks of enhancers54, 55. eRNAs could bind to CBP to regulate the acetyltransferase activity and then increased H3K27ac to promote transcription of the corresponding genes56. Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4), a member of the BET (Bromodomain and Extra Terminal) family proteins, assisted elongation of both coding and enhancer RNAs by interacting with acetylated histones57. The treatment of LPS resulted in increased H3K4me2 and H3K27ac at enhancer regions of the primary monocytes through ChIP-seq and knockdown of eRNAs by antisense oligonucleotides mainly affected histone modifications34. eRNAs can also alter histone modifications to regulate transcriptional repression. Nuclear receptor Rev-Erbs inhibited transcription in assistance of co-repressor histone deacetylase (NCoR)-HDAC3 complexes. After binding with enhancers, the levels of eRNAs and histone 3 lysine9 acetylation (H3K9Ac) were both reduced. Knockout of Rev-Erbs significantly derepressed eRNA production at relevant enhancers19.

Abnormalities of eRNAs are closely associated with a variety of diseases

Many previous studies on gene-related diseases have focused on mutations in coding genes, because they contain a blueprint for protein synthesis, which directly affects cellular biological functions. However, a large number of studies have shown that ncRNAs play a non-redundant role in regulating gene transcription and protein generation, such as eRNAs58. eRNAs can participate in the development of various disease by regulating the expression of multiple genes.

eRNAs and inflammation

NE et al.59 identified 76 LPS-induced eRNAs in monocytes. Among them, IL1β-eRNA mediated by the NF-KB signaling pathway was required for proinflammatory responses. Knockdown of IL1β-eRNA reduced the corresponding mRNA expression and the inflammatory media IL1β production, exhibiting the ability of eRNAs to regulate LPS-induced immune response. Furthermore, demethylase Kdm6a promoted IFN-β transcription through promoting full activation of IFN-β-specific enhancers to produce eRNAs in macrophages upon innate stimuli60. Bmal1 encoded by Arntl gene is a core circadian clock gene that regulates various genes involved in circadian rhythm. Bmal1 regulates inflammatory responses in macrophages by regulating the epigenetic states of enhancers, such as the level of H3K27 acetylation and modulating enhancer RNA transcription61. Inducible eRNAs may participate in intra- and inter-chromosomal gene regulation in the innate immune response62. In consequence, the close relationship between eRNAs and immune response in vivo provides a new perspective for the anti-inflammatory treatment. As a crucial NF-kB regulatory factor, BRD4 regulates the expression of many NF-kB-associated inflammatory genes. BRD4 occupies distal enhancer regions where its presence is associated with enhancer activity and eRNAs transcription63. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) recruits BRD4 to the promoters and enhancers of inflammatory genes to propel transcription. BRD4 inhibitor JQ1 attenuates the immune response by inhibiting H. pylori-induced eRNAs synthesis, in concomitant with decreased target gene synthesis. These provides potential therapeutic options for Helicobacter pylori associated gastric diseases, including gastritis and gastric cancer27.

eRNAs and neurodegenerative disorders

Pathogenic mutations carried on enhancers are easily overlooked in traditional genetic studies, but they play an important role in the development of hereditary neurodevelopmental and neuropsychiatric disorders. More than 100 enhancers have been found in brain tissue and they are more active than other tissues. Le et al.64 discovered that most of the enhancers in mouse striatum were transcribed into eRNAs. In huntington's disease (HD) mouse, relevant eRNAs were downregulated due to the reduction of RNAP II binding sites at HD mouse enhancers, leading to down-regulation of target genes compared with healthy individuals. Another study showed that enhancer regions producing eRNAs have genetic variants and were related to autism spectrum disorders (ASD)65, indicating enhancer-derived eRNAs as pivotal factors in neurodevelopmental impairments.

eRNAs and tumors

Zhao et al.66 identified hundreds of differentially expressed AR-eRNAs in enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells through AR ChIP-seq analyses. eRNAs involved in regulating the biological behavior of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells. What's more, PSA eRNA was up-regulated in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells, patient-derived xenografts (PDX), and patient tissues, and played its role as we described previously45, which may become a potential therapeutic target for CRPC. In another hormone-dependent tumor breast cancer cell MCF-7, Li et al.21 had reported widely estrogen-induced eRNA transcription with upregulated corresponding coding genes. Further studies showed that eRNAs enhanced E:P looping to increase estrogen-associated gene expression, and this was dependent on cohesins. Mutations located in enhancer regions in thyroid cancer are extremely rare and have a high genetic risk. He et al.67 found that the capacity of mutated enhancer binding to transcription factor POU2F and YY1 was significantly weakened, accompanying by a large number of reduced eRNAs. Mutations in enhancer regions were also observed in a type of basal cell carcinomas (BCC), which was called Bazex-Dupré-Christol syndrome (BDCS). The activity of mutant enhancer around ACTRT1 was reduced, as was the expression of ACTRT1. Act in related protein Tl (ARP-Tl) was encoded by ACTRT1 and the loss of ARP-Tl could abnormally activate the Hedgehog pathway, leading to the occurrence of BCC68.

eRNAs and diabetes

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor (NR). Rosiglitazone activates PPARγ potently with highly selective to improve insulin sensitivity in the body to control blood glucose effectively. Rosi-up-regulated eRNAs occurred at sites of strong PPARγ binding to which co-activators such as MED1, CBP and p300 were recruited. Remarkably, however, downregulation of eRNA transcription occurred at sites that were devoid of PPARγ but enriched for C/EBP and AP-1 family members69. Rosi-induced eRNAs occured only at PPARγ binding sites and could activate or inhibit adipocyte gene transcription in conjunction with co-activators or some transcription factors.

Conclusions and perspectives

In summary, the discovery of eRNAs provides a new perspective for better understanding of enhancers. eRNAs play an important role in the transcriptional process of target genes and the development of various diseases, and may be used to guide the treatment of disease safely and efficiently in the future. Nevertheless, the remaining puzzles of eRNAs require more extensive and thorough investigations. First of all, our understanding of eRNAs is largely based on high-throughput sequencing technologies. Given unstable and short half-life characteristics of eRNAs, tools to better detect changes intemporal and spatial with greater sensitivity are yet to be developed. In addition, opening up the methods for delaying the degradation of eRNAs is beneficial to our research. Next, generally identifying and documenting various patterns of eRNAs motion in different cell types is essential, as well as the function of silent enhancers that can't transcribe into eRNAs. Finally, we should expand the scope of eRNAs study. For instance, verifying abnormal expression of eRNAs in human tissues in case of illness is contribute to guide us in developing agents for eRNAs. Therefore, further research needs to be done to better understand the biology functions and mechanisms of eRNAs in gene regulation, human diseases and homeostasis.
Table 1

Inducible eRNAs related to diseases

Inducible eRNAsCorresponding enhancersInducible factorsTarget genesReferences
Inflammatory associated eRNAs
L2 enhancer, IFN-β-specific enhancersSendai virus, LPSIFNB135, 58
MnSOD intronic enhancerPro-inflammatory stimuli, the TEAD1/p65 complexMnSOD60
enhancers of inflammatory genesHelicobacter pylori, LPSNF-kB-dependent inflammatory genes25, 26, 57
Tumor-associated eRNAs
AR-regulated enhancersAndrogenARHGEF26, FTO, NKX3.1, et al.17, 43, 64
ER-regulated enhancersEstradiolGREB1, P2RY2, SMAD7, et al.16, 21
p53-bound enhancersRetroviruses, nutlin-3p53-dependent genes38, 39, 40
Brain region-specific eRNAs
Arc enhancersNeural activityNELF complex42
Diabetes-associated eRNAs
PPAR γ-binding enhancer sitesRosiglitazoneFabp4, Pdk4 et.al67

LPS: lipopolysaccharide; IFNB1: the interferon-β gene; MnSOD: manganese superoxide dismutase; AR: androgen receptor; ER: estrogen receptor; Arc: activity-regulated cytoskeletal protein; PPAR γ: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ.

  69 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced Identification of Transcriptional Enhancers Provides Mechanistic Insights into Diseases.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Murakawa; Masahito Yoshihara; Hideya Kawaji; Miki Nishikawa; Hatem Zayed; Harukazu Suzuki; Yoshihide Hayashizaki
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  SERPINB2 is regulated by dynamic interactions with pause-release proteins and enhancer RNAs.

Authors:  Lihua Shii; Li Song; Kelly Maurer; Zhe Zhang; Kathleen E Sullivan
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 3.  Enhancer function: mechanistic and genome-wide insights come together.

Authors:  Jennifer L Plank; Ann Dean
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Remodeling of the enhancer landscape during macrophage activation is coupled to enhancer transcription.

Authors:  Minna U Kaikkonen; Nathanael J Spann; Sven Heinz; Casey E Romanoski; Karmel A Allison; Joshua D Stender; Hyun B Chun; David F Tough; Rab K Prinjha; Christopher Benner; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Mll3 and Mll4 Facilitate Enhancer RNA Synthesis and Transcription from Promoters Independently of H3K4 Monomethylation.

Authors:  Kristel M Dorighi; Tomek Swigut; Telmo Henriques; Natarajan V Bhanu; Benjamin S Scruggs; Nataliya Nady; Christopher D Still; Benjamin A Garcia; Karen Adelman; Joanna Wysocka
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Anti-diabetic rosiglitazone remodels the adipocyte transcriptome by redistributing transcription to PPARγ-driven enhancers.

Authors:  Sonia E Step; Hee-Woong Lim; Jill M Marinis; Andreas Prokesch; David J Steger; Seo-Hee You; Kyoung-Jae Won; Mitchell A Lazar
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Tissue-specific RNA expression marks distant-acting developmental enhancers.

Authors:  Han Wu; Alex S Nord; Jennifer A Akiyama; Malak Shoukry; Veena Afzal; Edward M Rubin; Len A Pennacchio; Axel Visel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Predicting enhancer transcription and activity from chromatin modifications.

Authors:  Yun Zhu; Lin Sun; Zhao Chen; John W Whitaker; Tao Wang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription.

Authors:  Michael T Y Lam; Han Cho; Hanna P Lesch; David Gosselin; Sven Heinz; Yumiko Tanaka-Oishi; Christopher Benner; Minna U Kaikkonen; Aneeza S Kim; Mika Kosaka; Cindy Y Lee; Andy Watt; Tamar R Grossman; Michael G Rosenfeld; Ronald M Evans; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-06-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Global analysis of p53-regulated transcription identifies its direct targets and unexpected regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Mary Ann Allen; Zdenek Andrysik; Veronica L Dengler; Hestia S Mellert; Anna Guarnieri; Justin A Freeman; Kelly D Sullivan; Matthew D Galbraith; Xin Luo; W Lee Kraus; Robin D Dowell; Joaquin M Espinosa
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Biologia Futura: progress and future perspectives of long non-coding RNAs in forest trees.

Authors:  Maheswari Patturaj; Aiswarya Munusamy; Nithishkumar Kannan; Yasodha Ramasamy
Journal:  Biol Futur       Date:  2021-11-29

2.  Genomic Landscapes of Noncoding RNAs Regulating VEGFA and VEGFC Expression in Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Isidore Mushimiyimana; Vanesa Tomas Bosch; Nihay Laham-Karam; Minna U Kaikkonen; Henri Niskanen; Nicholas L Downes; Pierre R Moreau; Kiley Hartigan; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  Select Macrophage Noncoding RNAs of Interest in Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Zenaida Enchill; Connor Lantz; Edward B Thorp
Journal:  J Lipid Atheroscler       Date:  2020-01-16

4.  lncRNA TTN‑AS1 upregulates RUNX1 to enhance glioma progression via sponging miR‑27b‑3p.

Authors:  Keliang Chang; Genwei Wang; Jinfeng Lou; Sha Hao; Ranbo Lv; Desheng Duan; Wanhong Zhang; Yingchang Guo; Pengfei Wang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Epigenetic Regulation of WNT3A Enhancer during Regeneration of Injured Cortical Neurons.

Authors:  Chu-Yuan Chang; Jui-Hung Hung; Liang-Wei Huang; Joye Li; Ka Shing Fung; Cheng-Fu Kao; Linyi Chen
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  An inferred fitness consequence map of the rice genome.

Authors:  Zoé Joly-Lopez; Adrian E Platts; Brad Gulko; Jae Young Choi; Simon C Groen; Xuehua Zhong; Adam Siepel; Michael D Purugganan
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 15.793

7.  Modulation of Brain Pathology by Enhancer RNAs in Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Sunil Bhattarai; Aparna Akella; Atish Gandhi; Ashutosh Dharap
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.590

8.  A Robust Prognostic Gene Signature Based on eRNAs-Driven Genes in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Shuaishuai Fan; Zheng Wang; Li Zhao; ChenHui Zhao; DaJiang Yuan; Jingqi Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Emerging Roles of Estrogen-Regulated Enhancer and Long Non-Coding RNAs.

Authors:  Melina J Sedano; Alana L Harrison; Mina Zilaie; Chandrima Das; Ramesh Choudhari; Enrique Ramos; Shrikanth S Gadad
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Sex-based eRNA expression and function in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Diandra Ruiz; Sunil Bhattarai; Ashutosh Dharap
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.