Literature DB >> 30026161

Location and Threshold of Electrical Cortical Stimulation for Functional Brain Mapping.

Aya Kanno1, Rei Enatsu1, Satoshi Ookawa1, Satoko Ochi1, Nobuhiro Mikuni2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Although many studies have investigated functional localization by electrical stimulation, the threshold to identify each area remains controversial. The present study aimed to elucidate the threshold of a cortical stimulation for functional mapping.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 17 patients with medically intractable epilepsy who underwent a 50-Hz electrical cortical stimulation for functional mapping between October 2013 and May 2017. The symptoms induced by the stimulation and the thresholds of the stimulation for these responses were evaluated.
RESULTS: Motor responses were observed after the stimulation of the primary motor cortex, supplementary motor area, and frontal eye field, and sensory responses after the stimulation of the primary and secondary sensory cortex. Regarding negative responses, language impairment was observed after the stimulation of the anterior, posterior, and basal temporal language areas, negative motor responses after the stimulation of the premotor cortex, posterior parietal cortex, and the pre- supplementary motor area, and an impairment in spatial recognition after the stimulation of the right posterior parietal cortex. Negative or positive auditory symptoms were observed with the stimulation of the posterior superior temporal gyrus. The thresholds for positive phenomena were significantly lower than those for negative phenomena (Mann-Whitney U test, P < 0.01), and sensory responses were induced at significantly lower intensities than motor responses (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Positive and sensory effects are induced by lower intensities than negative and motor responses, respectively. The present results provide not only a practical guide for functional mapping, but also a hierarchal concept of processing in the brain.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electric cortical stimulation; Epilepsy; Functional brain mapping; Intracranial electrode

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30026161     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  3 in total

1.  Local and distant cortical responses to single pulse intracranial stimulation in the human brain are differentially modulated by specific stimulation parameters.

Authors:  Angelique C Paulk; Rina Zelmann; Britni Crocker; Alik S Widge; Darin D Dougherty; Emad N Eskandar; Daniel S Weisholtz; R Mark Richardson; G Rees Cosgrove; Ziv M Williams; Sydney S Cash
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Electrical Stimulation Mapping of Brain Function: A Comparison of Subdural Electrodes and Stereo-EEG.

Authors:  Krista M Grande; Sarah K Z Ihnen; Ravindra Arya
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Comparison of Thresholds between Bipolar and Monopolar Electrical Cortical Stimulation.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takahashi; Rei Enatsu; Aya Kanno; Seiichiro Imataka; Shoichi Komura; Tomoaki Tamada; Kyoya Sakashita; Ryohei Chiba; Takuro Saito; Nobuhiro Mikuni
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.036

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.