BACKGROUND: The direct effect of bipolar orientation on electrograms (EGMs) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the variation of EGMs with diagonally orthogonal bipoles. METHODS: The HD-32 Grid catheter (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN) can assess the effect of bipolar orientation while keeping the interelectrode distance and center unchanged. Seven sheep with anterior myocardial infarction were analyzed using diagonally orthogonal electrode pairs across splines by comparing local EGMs from each pair of opposing electrodes {eg. A1-B3 (southeast direction [SE]) vs A3-B1 (northeast direction [NE])}. RESULTS: A total of 4084 EGMs (1 in each direction) were analyzed for 2042 sites (544 in the infarcted area, 488 in the border area, and 1010 in the normal area). The higher and lower voltages measured using each pair of opposing electrodes significantly differed (1.10 mV [0.43-2.56 mV] vs 0.69 mV [0.28-1.58 mV]; P < .0001), and the median variation was 0.28 mV (0.11-0.80 mV) (31.7% [16.0%-48.9%]). The voltage variation was maximized to 48.7% (37.7%-61.6%) (P < .0001) on sites where the activation wavefront was perpendicular to the one bipolar direction and parallel to the other. A total of 594 of 719 (82.6%) sites with the voltage <0.5 mV and 539 of 699 (77.1%) sites with the voltage >1.5 mV in NE stayed in the same voltage range as those in SE. However, only 348 of 624 (55.8%) sites with the voltage 0.5-1.5 mV in NE stayed in the same range as those in SE. Local ventricular abnormal activities (LAVAs) were detected in 592 of 2042 (29.0%) sites in total, frequently distributed in the border area. A total of 177 (29.9%) LAVAs were missed in one direction and 180 (30.4%) in the other. When 415 (70.1%) LAVAs detected in NE are defined as the reference, 235 of 415 (56.6%) matched with those detected in SE. CONCLUSION: The bipolar voltage and distribution of LAVAs may differ significantly between diagonally orthogonal bipolar pairs at any given site.
BACKGROUND: The direct effect of bipolar orientation on electrograms (EGMs) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the variation of EGMs with diagonally orthogonal bipoles. METHODS: The HD-32 Grid catheter (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN) can assess the effect of bipolar orientation while keeping the interelectrode distance and center unchanged. Seven sheep with anterior myocardial infarction were analyzed using diagonally orthogonal electrode pairs across splines by comparing local EGMs from each pair of opposing electrodes {eg. A1-B3 (southeast direction [SE]) vs A3-B1 (northeast direction [NE])}. RESULTS: A total of 4084 EGMs (1 in each direction) were analyzed for 2042 sites (544 in the infarcted area, 488 in the border area, and 1010 in the normal area). The higher and lower voltages measured using each pair of opposing electrodes significantly differed (1.10 mV [0.43-2.56 mV] vs 0.69 mV [0.28-1.58 mV]; P < .0001), and the median variation was 0.28 mV (0.11-0.80 mV) (31.7% [16.0%-48.9%]). The voltage variation was maximized to 48.7% (37.7%-61.6%) (P < .0001) on sites where the activation wavefront was perpendicular to the one bipolar direction and parallel to the other. A total of 594 of 719 (82.6%) sites with the voltage <0.5 mV and 539 of 699 (77.1%) sites with the voltage >1.5 mV in NE stayed in the same voltage range as those in SE. However, only 348 of 624 (55.8%) sites with the voltage 0.5-1.5 mV in NE stayed in the same range as those in SE. Local ventricular abnormal activities (LAVAs) were detected in 592 of 2042 (29.0%) sites in total, frequently distributed in the border area. A total of 177 (29.9%) LAVAs were missed in one direction and 180 (30.4%) in the other. When 415 (70.1%) LAVAs detected in NE are defined as the reference, 235 of 415 (56.6%) matched with those detected in SE. CONCLUSION: The bipolar voltage and distribution of LAVAs may differ significantly between diagonally orthogonal bipolar pairs at any given site.
Authors: Neil T Srinivasan; Jason Garcia; Richard J Schilling; Syed Ahsan; Girish G Babu; Richard Ang; Mehul B Dhinoja; Ross J Hunter; Martin Lowe; Anthony W Chow; Pier D Lambiase Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-09-16
Authors: Karl Magtibay; Stéphane Massé; Ahmed Niri; Robert D Anderson; Ram B Kumar; D Curtis Deno; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2021-09-04
Authors: Lisette J M E van der Does; Roeliene Starreveld; Rohit K Kharbanda; Paul Knops; Charles Kik; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2021-03-29 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Sara Vázquez-Calvo; Paz Garre; Paula Sanchez-Somonte; Roger Borras; Levio Quinto; Gala Caixal; Margarida Pujol-Lopez; Till Althoff; Eduard Guasch; Elena Arbelo; José Maria Tolosana; Josep Brugada; Lluís Mont; Ivo Roca-Luque Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-08-01
Authors: Mathijs S van Schie; Rohit K Kharbanda; Charlotte A Houck; Eva A H Lanters; Yannick J H J Taverne; Ad J J C Bogers; Natasja M S de Groot Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2021-06-18