Sook C Hoang1, Adam A Klipfel2, Leslie A Roth2, Mathew Vrees2, Steven Schechter2, Nishit Shah2. 1. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA. Electronic address: sh7je@virginia.edu. 2. Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of the Surgical Care Improvement Project, surgical site infections remain a source of morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the value of implementing a colorectal bundle on SSI rates. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016 a total of 1351 patients underwent colorectal operations. Patients were grouped into pre-implementation (Group A, January 1, 2011-December 31, 2012), implementation (Group B, January 1, 2013-December 31, 2014) and post-implementation (Group C, January 1, 2015-December 31, 2016). Primary endpoints were superficial SSI, deep SSI, wound separation and total SSI. RESULTS: After the bundle was implemented, there was a significant reduction in superficial (6.6%-4%, p < 0.05), deep (3.7%-1.1%, p < 0.05), and total SSI rates (10.9%-4.7%, p < 0.05). Comparing Group A to Group C there was a decrease in total SSI (9.4%-4.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the bundle resulted in a reduction in overall SSI rates particularly as compliance increased. This study offers evidence that small changes can lead to significant decreases in surgical site infections.
BACKGROUND: Despite the introduction of the Surgical Care Improvement Project, surgical site infections remain a source of morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the value of implementing a colorectal bundle on SSI rates. METHODS: Between 2011 and 2016 a total of 1351 patients underwent colorectal operations. Patients were grouped into pre-implementation (Group A, January 1, 2011-December 31, 2012), implementation (Group B, January 1, 2013-December 31, 2014) and post-implementation (Group C, January 1, 2015-December 31, 2016). Primary endpoints were superficial SSI, deep SSI, wound separation and total SSI. RESULTS: After the bundle was implemented, there was a significant reduction in superficial (6.6%-4%, p < 0.05), deep (3.7%-1.1%, p < 0.05), and total SSI rates (10.9%-4.7%, p < 0.05). Comparing Group A to Group C there was a decrease in total SSI (9.4%-4.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the bundle resulted in a reduction in overall SSI rates particularly as compliance increased. This study offers evidence that small changes can lead to significant decreases in surgical site infections.
Authors: Joshua S Jolissaint; Bryan V Dieffenbach; Thomas C Tsai; Luise I Pernar; Brent T Shoji; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkoli Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 3.982