Kuang-Cheng Yin1, Chien-Hsing Lu2, Jin-Ching Lin1, Chiann-Yi Hsu3, Lily Wang4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. 3. Biostatics Task Force, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. Electronic address: llwang1212@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, the standard treatment methods revealed no difference between locally advanced cervical (LAC) adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC) and LAC squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of LAC AC/ASC with LAC SCC through the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 181 LAC cancer patients who were treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy and concurrent weekly cisplatin 30-40 mg/m2. In total, there were 151 LAC SCC patients and 30 LAC AC/ASC patients. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). A 1:1 ratio PSM analysis was performed using the nearest neighbor method with a caliper of 0.20. Treatment outcomes were compared between 30 matched LAC SCC patients and 30 LAC AC/ASC patients. RESULTS: Before a 1:1 ratio PSM, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFFS, and DMFS in the LAC SCC group were 78.6%, 71.3%, 88.2%, and 76.2%, respectively. After a 1:1 ratio PSM, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFFS, and DMFS in the LAC AC/ASC group were 46.0%, 43.3%, 70.0%, and 45.4%, respectively, which were all significantly inferior than the rates of 90.0%, 75.8%, 96.6%, and 78.8% in the matched LAC SCC group, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: LAC AC/ASC carries a poorer prognosis than LAC SCC. LAC AC/ASC needs more aggressive treatment in order to achieve higher OS and DFS.
BACKGROUND: In the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, the standard treatment methods revealed no difference between locally advanced cervical (LAC) adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma (AC/ASC) and LAC squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to compare the treatment outcomes of LAC AC/ASC with LAC SCC through the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 181 LAC cancerpatients who were treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy and concurrent weekly cisplatin 30-40 mg/m2. In total, there were 151 LAC SCC patients and 30 LAC AC/ASC patients. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). A 1:1 ratio PSM analysis was performed using the nearest neighbor method with a caliper of 0.20. Treatment outcomes were compared between 30 matched LAC SCC patients and 30 LAC AC/ASC patients. RESULTS: Before a 1:1 ratio PSM, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFFS, and DMFS in the LAC SCC group were 78.6%, 71.3%, 88.2%, and 76.2%, respectively. After a 1:1 ratio PSM, the 5-year OS, DFS, LRFFS, and DMFS in the LAC AC/ASC group were 46.0%, 43.3%, 70.0%, and 45.4%, respectively, which were all significantly inferior than the rates of 90.0%, 75.8%, 96.6%, and 78.8% in the matched LAC SCC group, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: LAC AC/ASC carries a poorer prognosis than LAC SCC. LAC AC/ASC needs more aggressive treatment in order to achieve higher OS and DFS.
Authors: Lenny Gallardo-Alvarado; David Cantú-de León; Rebeca Ramirez-Morales; Gabriel Santiago-Concha; Salim Barquet-Muñoz; Rosa Salcedo-Hernandez; Cinthya Reyes; Sandra Perez-Alvarez; Delia Perez-Montiel; Carlos Perez-Plasencia; Elizabeth Trejo-Duran; Juan Pablo Galicia Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-04-13 Impact factor: 4.430