Kelvin Yi Chong Teo1,2, Shu Yen Lee1,2, Amutha Veluchamy Barathi3,4, Sai Bo Bo Tun3, Licia Tan1,2, Ian Jeffery Constable5,6. 1. Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore. 2. Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Translational Pre-clinical Model Platform, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 5. Centre of Ophthalmology and Visual Science (incorporating Lions Eye Institute), The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if the surgical removal of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) in nonhuman primates (NHPs) will result in safe and effective transfection of adeno-associated viral (AAV2) vectors using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter. Methods: Six Macaca fascicularis NHP eyes underwent vitrectomy, ILM peel with layering of 1.7 × 1013 genome copies per milliliter of AAV2-GFP under air. Four control eyes underwent only vitrectomy and pooling under air. The intensity and area transfected was quantified in vivo with fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. NHPs were euthanized 16 weeks postsurgery and immunohistochemical analysis assessed GFP expression at the cellular level. Results: There was a larger area of fluorescence in ILM peeled eyes then in non-ILM peeled eyes (50.7 [33.1-58.4] pixel2 versus 5.1 [0.6-7.6] pixel2, P < 0.01). The intensity of fluorescence was also higher in ILM peeled eyes (10.3 [2.2-18.5] vs. 1.9 [0.6-4.4], P = 0.05). Non-ILM peeled eyes displayed fluorescence confined to the foveal center. Histological sections showed colocalization in the Müller cell layer, ganglion cell layer, and photoreceptor cell layer in the ILM peeled eyes. In non-ILM peeled eyes GFP expression was only in the ganglion cell layer in three eyes and was confined to the immediate vicinity of the fovea. Conclusions: ILM appears to be the predominate barrier to AAV transfection. An efficacious and safe method of AAV2 gene delivery, taking into account the potential need for repeat treatments, appears to be the surgical removal of ILM and layering of AAV under air.v.
Purpose: To determine if the surgical removal of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) in nonhuman primates (NHPs) will result in safe and effective transfection of adeno-associated viral (AAV2) vectors using green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a reporter. Methods: Six Macaca fascicularis NHP eyes underwent vitrectomy, ILM peel with layering of 1.7 × 1013 genome copies per milliliter of AAV2-GFP under air. Four control eyes underwent only vitrectomy and pooling under air. The intensity and area transfected was quantified in vivo with fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. NHPs were euthanized 16 weeks postsurgery and immunohistochemical analysis assessed GFP expression at the cellular level. Results: There was a larger area of fluorescence in ILM peeled eyes then in non-ILM peeled eyes (50.7 [33.1-58.4] pixel2 versus 5.1 [0.6-7.6] pixel2, P < 0.01). The intensity of fluorescence was also higher in ILM peeled eyes (10.3 [2.2-18.5] vs. 1.9 [0.6-4.4], P = 0.05). Non-ILM peeled eyes displayed fluorescence confined to the foveal center. Histological sections showed colocalization in the Müller cell layer, ganglion cell layer, and photoreceptor cell layer in the ILM peeled eyes. In non-ILM peeled eyes GFP expression was only in the ganglion cell layer in three eyes and was confined to the immediate vicinity of the fovea. Conclusions: ILM appears to be the predominate barrier to AAV transfection. An efficacious and safe method of AAV2 gene delivery, taking into account the potential need for repeat treatments, appears to be the surgical removal of ILM and layering of AAV under air.v.
Authors: Sophia-Martha Kleine Holthaus; Mikel Aristorena; Ryea Maswood; Olha Semenyuk; Justin Hoke; Aura Hare; Alexander J Smith; Sara E Mole; Robin R Ali Journal: Hum Gene Ther Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 5.695
Authors: Kevin Y Zhang; Caitlyn Tuffy; Joseph L Mertz; Sarah Quillen; Laurence Wechsler; Harry A Quigley; Donald J Zack; Thomas V Johnson Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 7.765
Authors: Beau J Fenner; Tien-En Tan; Amutha Veluchamy Barathi; Sai Bo Bo Tun; Sia Wey Yeo; Andrew S H Tsai; Shu Yen Lee; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung; Choi Mun Chan; Jodhbir S Mehta; Kelvin Y C Teo Journal: Front Genet Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Tien-En Tan; Beau James Fenner; Veluchamy Amutha Barathi; Sai Bo Bo Tun; Yeo Sia Wey; Andrew Shih Hsiang Tsai; Xinyi Su; Shu Yen Lee; Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung; Tien Yin Wong; Jodhbir Singh Mehta; Kelvin Yi Chong Teo Journal: Front Genet Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 4.599