Literature DB >> 30025006

Bone Volume Dynamics and Implant Placement Torque in Horizontal Bone Defects Reconstructed with Autologous or Xenogeneic Block Bone: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth, Prospective Clinical Trial.

Rafael Guimarães Lima, Tito Guimarães Lima, Carlos Eduardo Francischone, Cecilia Turssi, Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis, Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate volumetric stability of autologous and xenogeneic block grafts and primary stability of implants in maxillary grafted areas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each patient received one autologous block and xenogeneic block, both covered with a membrane. Bone thickness measurements clinically and tomographically were made before, immediately, and 6 months postoperatively. After 6 months, identical implants were placed in each grafted area, and primary stability was measured.
RESULTS: Eight patients with anterior horizontal bone defects were selected. Clinical outcomes at 6 months postgrafting in the autologous block revealed a mean thickness of 7.4 ± 1.6 mm, with an initial mean measurement of 3.4 ± 1.7 mm and 2.6% resorption, whereas the mean in the xenogeneic block was 8.9 ± 1.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.6 mm, and 7.3%, respectively. Tomographic evaluation of the thickness at 6 months postgrafting in the autologous block was a mean 7.8 ± 1.8 mm, with an initial mean of 3.7 ± 1.6 mm and resorption of 0%, while the mean in the xenogeneic block was 9.3 ± 1.6 mm, 3.6 ± 1.4 mm, and 2.1%, respectively. No significant difference in bone thickness was observed immediately or 6 months after the procedure. The mean implant placement torque was 32 ± 22 Ncm in the autologous block and 18 ± 9 Ncm in the xenogeneic block (P = .004).
CONCLUSION: Xenogeneic block was shown to be a suitable alternative to reconstruct horizontal defects in the alveolar ridge that had undergone extensive resorption, though lower insertion torques were obtained during implant placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30025006     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  5 in total

1.  Effect of Locally Administered Denosumab on Bone Graft Healing in Rabbit Critical-Size Calvarial Defects.

Authors:  Taha Özer; Özgür Başlarlı; Alper Aktaş; Emre Barış; Mert Ocak
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Carlos Ricardo de Queiroz Martiniano; Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas; Jose Ronildo Lins do Carmo Filho; Ana Paula Negreiros Nunes Alves; Mara Assef Leitão Lotif; Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior; Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho Dantas; Luciane Lacerda Franco Rocha Rodrigues; Carlos Eduardo Francischone
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A novel in situ bone elevation method to achieve vertical periodontal augmentation in dogs: A pilot study.

Authors:  Lili Li; Wenqi Su; Xiaoting Xie; Lang Lei; Jun Bao; Shasha He; Sheng Chen; Yan Yang; Fuhua Yan; Houxuan Li
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  Bone augmentation with autologous tooth shell in the esthetic zone for dental implant restoration: a pilot study.

Authors:  Shuyi Li; Ming Gao; Miao Zhou; Yibo Zhu
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-11-08

Review 5.  Survival Rates of Dental Implants in Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Blocks: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Phil Donkiewicz; Korbinian Benz; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter; Jochen Jackowski
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.