PURPOSE: To compare typical polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (T-PCV) and polypoidal choroidal neovascularization (P-CNV), which can be defined as two subtypes of PCV, and to elucidate the significance of the classification. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with PCV and followed up for more than 12 months were reviewed. The PCV cases were divided into a T-PCV group (n = 36) and a P-CNV group (n = 41) according to the presence of features of pachychoroid or age-related macular degeneration. Angiographic and tomographic characteristics and changes in vision during the follow-up period were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity of T-PCV and P-CNV was 0.27 ± 0.31 and 0.62 ± 0.47 at baseline (P < 0.001) and 0.28 ± 0.41 and 0.54 ± 0.52 at the final visit (P = 0.006), respectively. A marginally higher rate of complete response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment was noted in the T-PCV group (47.2%) compared with the P-CNV group (26.8%) (P = 0.05). At the final visit, subfoveal fibrosis was noted in 11.1% of the T-PCV group and 39.0% of the P-CNV group (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The two subtypes of PCV, P-CNV and T-PCV, behave differently in terms of angiographic and tomographic manifestations and visual outcomes. Classifying PCVs would be helpful not only for pathogenic implications, but also for prognostic significance.
PURPOSE: To compare typical polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (T-PCV) and polypoidal choroidal neovascularization (P-CNV), which can be defined as two subtypes of PCV, and to elucidate the significance of the classification. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with PCV and followed up for more than 12 months were reviewed. The PCV cases were divided into a T-PCV group (n = 36) and a P-CNV group (n = 41) according to the presence of features of pachychoroid or age-related macular degeneration. Angiographic and tomographic characteristics and changes in vision during the follow-up period were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity of T-PCV and P-CNV was 0.27 ± 0.31 and 0.62 ± 0.47 at baseline (P < 0.001) and 0.28 ± 0.41 and 0.54 ± 0.52 at the final visit (P = 0.006), respectively. A marginally higher rate of complete response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment was noted in the T-PCV group (47.2%) compared with the P-CNV group (26.8%) (P = 0.05). At the final visit, subfoveal fibrosis was noted in 11.1% of the T-PCV group and 39.0% of the P-CNV group (P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: The two subtypes of PCV, P-CNV and T-PCV, behave differently in terms of angiographic and tomographic manifestations and visual outcomes. Classifying PCVs would be helpful not only for pathogenic implications, but also for prognostic significance.