Literature DB >> 30024480

Effect of Varying Self-myofascial Release Duration on Subsequent Athletic Performance.

Jake Phillips1, David Diggin, Deborah L King, Gary A Sforzo.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Phillips, J, Diggin, D, King, DL, and Sforzo, GA. Effect of varying self-myofascial release duration on subsequent athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res 35(3): 746-753, 2021-Self-myofascial release (SMR) treatments can enhance joint range-of-motion and restore movement function. The effects of different SMR durations on athletic performance have yet to be examined. Twenty-four volunteers had ankle and knee joint range-of-motion assessed using modified weight-bearing and kneeling lunge (KL) tests. Vertical jump and pro-agility sprint performance were also examined. All tests were conducted before and immediately after 1 (SMR_1) and 5 minutes (SMR_5) of foam rolling, and immediately after a control (CONTR) condition. Results showed KL scores increased after SMR_5 (16.4%; effect size [ES] = 0.85) when compared with SMR_1 (12.5%; ES = 0.58). Weight-bearing lunge scores showed little change after either SMR treatment. The CONTR condition exhibited little effect on joint range-of-motion. Vertical jump performance decreased after SMR_5 (5.1%; ES = 0.26) but changed little after SMR_1 (0.7%; ES = 0.03) and CONTR (1.9%; ES = 0.10) conditions. Pro-agility performance improved slightly after SMR_1 (1.1%) but deteriorated after CONTR (1.2%) and SMR_5 (0.5%). Effect size calculations for changes in pro-agility sprint times were trivial across all conditions (0.06-0.15). Data suggest that extended periods of SMR may be recommended, should improvements in joint range-of-motion be required. If power output is a critical requirement of subsequent exercise/performance tasks, prolonged SMR treatment (i.e., 5 minutes) should be avoided. Practitioners should be cautious when implementing SMR treatments within warm-ups.
Copyright © 2018 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 30024480     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  11 in total

1.  Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Cycling Performance: A Randomized Cross-Over Study.

Authors:  Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE Camargo; Paulo Henrique Barbosa; Matheus Correa Moraes; Tiago Volpi Braz; Felipe Alves Brigatto; Danilo Rodrigues Batista; Guilherme Borsseti Businari; Charlini Simoni Hartz; Ricardo Adamoli Simões; Marcelo Saldanha Aoki; Charles Ricardo Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  The Acute and Prolonged Effects of Different Durations of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion, Muscle Stiffness, and Muscle Strength.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Remi Onuma; Ryosuke Kiyono; Koki Yasaka; Shigeru Sato; Kaoru Yahata; Taizan Fukaya; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Acute Effects of Foam Rolling on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Multilevel Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jan Wilke; Anna-Lena Müller; Florian Giesche; Gerard Power; Hamid Ahmedi; David G Behm
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Effects of Self-myofascial Release Instruments on Performance and Recovery: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Ricardo M Ferreira; Pedro N Martins; Rui S Goncalves
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-06-01

5.  DURATION OF MYOFASCIAL ROLLING FOR OPTIMAL RECOVERY, RANGE OF MOTION, AND PERFORMANCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE.

Authors:  Garrett A Hughes; Leanne M Ramer
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12

6.  Effects of Foam Rolling Duration on Tissue Stiffness and Perfusion: A Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

Authors:  Jan Schroeder; Jan Wilke; Karsten Hollander
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Self-Myofascial Release Effect With Foam Rolling on Recovery After High-Intensity Interval Training.

Authors:  Guillaume Laffaye; Debora Torrinha Da Silva; Arnaud Delafontaine
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  INFLUENCE OF FOAM ROLLING ON ELBOW PROPRIOCEPTION, STRENGTH, AND FUNCTIONAL MOTOR PERFORMANCE.

Authors:  Fatma Ozden; Sevgi Sevi Yesilyaprak
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.824

9.  Effect of vibration vs non-vibration foam rolling techniques on flexibility, dynamic balance and perceived joint stability after fatigue.

Authors:  Ana María de Benito; Raúl Valldecabres; Diego Ceca; Jim Richards; Joaquín Barrachina Igual; Ana Pablos
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Local and Non-local Effects of Foam Rolling on Passive Soft Tissue Properties and Spinal Excitability.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Andreas Konrad; Ryosuke Kiyono; Shigeru Sato; Kaoru Yahata; Riku Yoshida; Koki Yasaka; Yuta Murakami; Futaba Sanuki; Jan Wilke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.