Literature DB >> 30024049

Percentage of methylmercury in the muscle tissue of freshwater fish varies with body size and age and among species.

Gretchen L Lescord1, Thomas A Johnston1,2, Brian A Branfireun3, John M Gunn1.   

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that most (>95%) of the mercury (Hg) found in fish muscle is the toxic form, methylmercury (MeHg), due to its efficient assimilation and retention in biotic tissue. However, this assumption is largely based on studies examining the percentage of MeHg (%MeHg [the fraction of total Hg as MeHg]) in muscle from mostly large-bodied predatory fish; less is known about the %MeHg in smaller bodied individuals or those of different trophic guilds. The present study analyzed MeHg and total Hg concentrations in the muscle of 2 large-bodied piscivores (walleye and northern pike), one large-bodied benthivore (white sucker), and 2 small-bodied forage fish (sculpins and shiners) across a broad size range. We found substantially lower %MeHg than the commonly assumed 95% in several fish (e.g., 17 individuals had <70% MeHg). Muscle %MeHg significantly increased with size and age in all species except walleye, which had significantly higher %MeHg than pike or suckers, particularly in smaller and younger fish (e.g., 18-21% higher at 10 g; 5-11% higher at 500 g). Results of predictive modeling suggest that muscle %MeHg is higher in pelagic-feeding fish and those with lower lipid content, although model results varied significantly among species. According to our findings, total Hg measurement in muscle is not an appropriate proxy for MeHg in smaller fish from all species, an important consideration for future piscine Hg studies and monitoring. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2682-2691.
© 2018 SETAC. © 2018 SETAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30024049     DOI: 10.1002/etc.4233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Mercury bioaccumulation in freshwater fishes of the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Authors:  James J Willacker; Collin A Eagles-Smith; Vicki S Blazer
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Food frequency questionnaire assessing traditional food consumption in Dene/Métis communities, Northwest Territories, Canada.

Authors:  Mylène Ratelle; Kelly Skinner; Sara Packull-McCormick; Brian Laird
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.228

3.  Mislabelling and high mercury content hampers the efforts of market-based seafood initiatives in Peru.

Authors:  Daniella Biffi; Andrea López-Mobilia; Shaleyla Kelez; Dean A Williams; Matthew M Chumchal; Molly Weinburgh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Methylmercury determination in freshwater biota and sediments: Static headspace GC-MS compared to direct mercury analyzer.

Authors:  Lucia Valsecchi; Claudio Roscioli; Alfredo Schiavon; Laura Marziali
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-11-18

5.  Effects of Speciation, Cooking and Changes in Bioaccessibility on Methylmercury Exposure Assessment for Contrasting Diets of Fish and Marine Mammals.

Authors:  Tania Charette; Gregory Kaminski; Maikel Rosabal; Marc Amyot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.