Literature DB >> 30023977

Survival outcomes after D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection in stage II-III gastric cancer: Longitudinal follow-up in a single center.

Adam Uslu1, Baha Zengel1, Enver İlhan1, Ahmet Aykas1, Cenk Şimşek1, Orhan Üreyen1, Ali Duran1, Gökalp Okut1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: D2 lymphadenectomy (D2-LND) with curative resection (R0) is the cornerstone of gastric cancer treatment. In this study, we compared survival outcomes of D2-LDN with D1-LDN in patients who had undergone curative resection for Stages II and III primary gastric adenocarcinoma.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between April 1996 and March 2014, 153 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach underwent total gastrectomy with D1-LND or D2-LND. Among those, 118 patients (38 D1 vs. 80 D2) with a complete history and having been followed for at least 1 year after surgery were enrolled. Both groups were compared in terms of demographic and clinico-pathologic characteristics.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 42.6±52.5 months (mo.). The demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. The Tumor, Node and Metastases (TNM) stage distribution was 25% for Stage II and 75% for Stage III for both groups. Eighteen patients (47.4%) in the D1 and 47 patients (58.8%) in the D2 group were free from locoregional recurrence. The median disease-free survival was 22.0±4.1 mo. for the D1 and 28.0±4.3 mo. for the D2 group (p=0.36). Eight patients (21%) in the D1 and 39 patients (49%) in the D2 group were alive at the last follow-up. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.0±3.7 mo. for the D1 and 31.0±5.4 mo. for the D2 group (p=0.13). The 5-year disease-free survival and OS by the Kaplan-Meier estimates were 41% vs. 51% and 30% vs. 42% in the D1 and D2 groups, respectively. The median 5-year OS for patients with Stages IIIB and IIIC tumors was 14.0±2.2 mo. for the D1 and 20.0±5.0 mo. for the D2 group, respectively (p: 0.048).
CONCLUSION: When compared to D1-LND, D2-LND with R0 resection have yielded a trend toward a better outcome in patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  D1 lymph node dissection; D2 lymph node dissection; R0 resection; total gastrectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30023977      PMCID: PMC6048646          DOI: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3846

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  35 in total

1.  Enforcing centralization for gastric cancer in Denmark.

Authors:  L S Jensen; H Nielsen; P B Mortensen; H K Pilegaard; S P Johnsen
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach.

Authors:  Kay Washington
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Impact of histopathology on the outcome of D1/D2 gastrectomies with R0 resection.

Authors:  Adam Uslu; Hasan Bati; Hakan Postaci; Ahmet Nart; Nukhet Eliyatkin; Halit Yetis; Baris Corumlu; Ahmet Aykas; Baha Zengel
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; P Fayers; J Fielding; J Craven; J Bancewicz; V Joypaul; P Cook
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Outcomes of gastric cancer resections performed in a high volume community cancer center.

Authors:  Arvind Sabesan; Nicholas J Petrelli; Joseph J Bennett
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Is gastric carcinoma different between Japan and the United States?

Authors:  Y Noguchi; T Yoshikawa; A Tsuburaya; H Motohashi; M S Karpeh; M F Brennan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Authors:  A Cuschieri; S Weeden; J Fielding; J Bancewicz; J Craven; V Joypaul; M Sydes; P Fayers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Prospective comparison of D1 vs modified D2 gastrectomy for carcinoma.

Authors:  P Edwards; G R J C Blackshaw; W G Lewis; J D Barry; M C Allison; D R B Jones
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-17       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy: an Updated Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials for Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Bhavin Vasavada; Hardik Patel
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-09

2.  The efficacy of clinical pathway in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Ali Güner
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-03-18

3.  Anatomical location-based nodal staging system is superior to the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system among patients with surgically resected, histologically low-grade gastric cancer: A single institutional experience.

Authors:  Mei-Wen Chen; Chien-Pin Chan; Yih-Jeng Lin; Hsu-Heng Yen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A retrospective study comparing D1 limited lymph node dissection and D2 extended lymph node dissection for N3 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Xing Luo; Ming-Xiu Zhou; Wei Tian; Ming Zeng; Jian-Ling Xia; Gao-Ping Zhao; Hong-Lin Hu; Xin-Bao Hao; Liang-Fu Han; Hao Liu; Yang-Ke He; Xue-Qiang Zhu; Liang Liang; Min Wei; Li-Li Deng
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.