| Literature DB >> 30023177 |
Mohamed Laban1, Eman Abdel-Salam Ibrahim2, Wael Agur1,3, Ahmed M Bahaaa Elddin Ahmed1.
Abstract
The role of Bcl-2 in initiation and progression of endometrial carcinoma is still with inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to determine the role of Bcl-2 in endometrial tumorigenesis. It is a retrospective cross sectional study. We used 100 endometrial paraffin embedded specimens for Bcl-2 oncoprotein immunohistochemical staining; 20 samples of normal endometrium, 40 specimens of endometrial hyperplasia (simple, complex and atypical) and 40 specimens of endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The results were statistically analyzed. There was a significant increase in Bcl-2 staining from normal through complex and atypical hyperplasia into well differentiated adenocarcinoma (P =0.002, P =0.0008 and P =0.0001, respectively). There was a significant difference between the staining of different types of endometrial hyperplasia; as it up streamed from the simple through the complex up to the atypical types (P <0.05). Bcl-2 staining showed no significant correlation with the moderately, poorly differentiated and the different stages of adenocarcinoma (P =0.6, P =0.29 and P =0.1 respectively). These results might indicate a substantial role for Bcl-2 as one of the initiating drives for endometrial tumorigenesis, but not in further tumor progression.Entities:
Keywords: Atypical endometrial hyperplasia; Bcl-2; Complex endometrial hyperplasia; Endometrial cancer; Simple endometrial hyperplasia
Year: 2014 PMID: 30023177 PMCID: PMC6014220 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmau.2014.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Microsc Ultrastruct ISSN: 2213-879X
Statistical correlation between the normal endometrium versus other groups with regard to immunohistochemical Bcl-2 staining.
| Group (number of patients) | Negative Bcl-2 (%) | Positive Bcl-2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weak (1+) (%) | Strong (2+) (%) | |||
| 16 (80%) | 4 (20%) | 0 | ||
| Simple (12) | 10 (83%) | 1 (8.5%) | 1 (8.5%) | 1 |
| Complex (16) | 4 (25%) | 6 (34.5%) | 6 (34.5%) | 0.002* |
| Atypical (12) | 2 (17%) | 2 (17%) | 8 (66%) | 0.0008** |
| Well differentiated (24) | 4 (16.7%) | 2 (8.3%) | 18 (75%) | 0.0001** |
| Moderately differentiated (10) | 4 (40%) | 2 (20%) | 4 (40%) | 0.06 |
| Poorly differentiated (6) | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | 0 | 0.29 |
*P is significant.
**P is highly significant.
Fig. 1A; normal proliferative endometrial gland with focal weak Bcl-2 positivity. (Bcl-2 × 200). B; complex endometrial hyperplasia, the endometrialglands are Bcl-2 positive, they are embedded in scanty endometrial stroma (Bcl-2 × 100). C; well differentiated adenocarcinoma, D; moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Both show strong Bcl-2 staining positivity (Bcl-2 × 100).
Statistical correlation between the different stages of the endometrial cancer and the normal endometrium regarding the immunohistochemical of Bcl-2 expression.
| Stage = number of patients (%) | Number of patients with −ve Bcl-2 expression (%) | Number of patients with weak Bcl-2 expression (%) | Number of patients with strong Bcl-2 expression (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal endometrium (20) | 16 (80%) | 4 (20%) | 0 | 0.2 |
| I = 26 (65%) | 5 (19.2%) | 1 (3.8%) | 20 (77%) | |
| II = 7 (17.5%) | 4 (57%) | 2 (28.5%) | 1 (14.5%) | |
| III and IV = 7 (17.5%) | 2 (28.5%) | 5 (71.5%) | 0 | |
| Total = 40 | 11 (27.5%) | 8 (20%) | 21 (52.5%) |