Literature DB >> 30023159

Impact of Time Delay in Processing Blood Sample on Next Generation Sequencing for Transcriptome Analysis.

Jae-Eun Lee1, So-Young Jung1, So-Youn Shin1, Young-Youl Kim1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA; blood; pre-analytical variations

Year:  2018        PMID: 30023159      PMCID: PMC6037398          DOI: 10.24171/j.phrp.2018.9.3.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect        ISSN: 2210-9099


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Detection of mRNA in blood samples is emerging as a potential biomarker of diagnosis or prognosis of disease [1, 2]. However, pre-analytical variations in mRNA expression can occur because of a delay in blood processing [3, 4]. In microarray-based transcriptome analysis, gene expression in blood cells was significantly altered by delayed blood sample processing (room temperature ≥ 2 hours) [3, 4]. There are no published studies of the effects of delayed blood sample processing on next generation sequencing for transcriptome analysis. This study was designed to address this.. Blood was collected from a healthy volunteer using 3 EDTA coated tubes. The process of RNA extraction began directly following blood collection, or after cold storage (4°C) for either 24 hours or 48 hours. Using a QIAamp RNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, RNA was extracted and its concentration was measured using a Quant-iT™ RiboGreen RNA Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To calculate the RNA Integrity Number (RIN), the RNA 6000 Pico kitwas used and run on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The RNA was then sequenced on the GS Junior platform (Roche, Branford, CT, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, double-stranded cDNA was synthesized using the cDNA Synthesis System (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), was fractionated into 600–900 bp fragments via nebulization by compressed nitrogen gas, and then cDNA fragments were ligated to 2 adaptors for 3′ and 5′ ends. Following purification and quantitation, DNA libraries were used for emulsion PCR (emPCR) and bead enrichment. Sequencing was carried out using the GS Junior Titanium Sequencing Kit (Roche Diagnostics). Contig assembly was performed using CLC Genomic Workbench 6 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). To evaluate the effects of delayed blood processing on RNA-seq analysis, concentrations of RNA, RIN, and the number of contigs were assessed from the same volume of blood prepared directly following collection, or after cold storage (4°C) for either 24 hours or 48 hours (Table 1).
Table 1

Effects of a delay in blood sample processing on RNA-seq analysis.

Delay time

0 h24 h48 h
RNA QualityRNA concentration (ng/μL)343213
RNA Integrity Number1088

Contig (NGS data)N75 (bp)503502486
N50 (bp)614582537
N25 (bp)955905801
Minimum (bp)233132
Maximum (bp)4,0974,4575,055
Average (bp)633615572
Total length (bp)4,160,3913,194,7872,188,883
Contig count6,5775,1913,829

Venn diagram (NGS data)Gene Count

bp = base pairs; NGS = next generation sequencing.

The concentration of RNA was much lower in blood sample (13 ng/μL) that was stored at 4°C for 48 hours compared to the blood sample (34 ng/μL) that was prepared immediately. A decrease in RIN value (≤ 20%) was observed for cold storage delayed processing and the number of contigs gradually reduced by ≥ 40%. The number of transcripts, annotated with contigs via an expressed sequence tag (EST) database, was 2857 in the blood sample prepared immediately and for cold stored samples, 2213 for a 24-hour delay and, 1700 for a 48-hour delay in processing. The number of transcripts also gradually decreased by ≤ 40% according to processing delay. Amongst the transcripts, 146 transcripts were detected in both blood samples stored at 4°C but not in the blood sample prepared immediately. These included genes associated with signal transduction (e.g. IMPA2, ABR, MAP2K1, RASGRP2, RIN3), transcription (e.g. PHB, GATAD2A, MDM2, RNF25, S100A12), and cell cycle arrest (e.g. CCDC88B, CCR2, PYCARD) (data not shown). A few biomarkers for diseases were differentially expressed by delayed processing of blood samples; mRNAs of C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) and C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 1 (CXCR1) were only detected when the processing of blood samples was delayed, but not in the blood sample prepared immediately after blood collection. These genes are putative mRNA biomarkers in peripheral blood for progression or severity of hepatocellular carcinoma [5] and coronary artery disease [6], respectively. These findings indicate that the processing condition of blood samples may affect the diagnosis of disease using mRNA biomarkers. Contrary to this result, CCR2 expression in microarray data has been shown to decrease with delayed processing. The difference between studies supports findings that pre-analytical variations can depend on the assay method [7]. In conclusion, the impact of delayed blood processing on next generation sequencing data for transcriptome analysis has been identified. This study has found that the quantity and quality of RNA in a blood sample was sensitive to time from collection to processing. The number of detectable transcripts decreased and expression patterns of transcripts including putative mRNA biomarkers, altered according delayed processing. Our study suggests that a blood sample with a longtime-delay from blood collection to processing, should not be used for transcriptome analysis for research or diagnostic purposes. However, further studies with more volunteers are necessary.
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of different isolation techniques prior gene expression profiling of blood derived cells: impact on physiological responses, on overall expression and the role of different cell types.

Authors:  S Debey; U Schoenbeck; M Hellmich; B S Gathof; R Pillai; T Zander; J L Schultze
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 2.  Blood-based biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ebru E Yörüker; Stefan Holdenrieder; Ugur Gezer
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  A blood-based three-gene signature for the non-invasive detection of early human hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ming Shi; Min-Shan Chen; Karthik Sekar; Chee-Kiat Tan; London Lucien Ooi; Kam M Hui
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Impact of Preanalytical Variations in Blood-Derived Biospecimens on Omics Studies: Toward Precision Biobanking?

Authors:  Jae-Eun Lee; Young-Youl Kim
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  Gene Expression Profiles from Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Are Sensitive to Short Processing Delays.

Authors:  Michael G Barnes; Alexei A Grom; Thomas A Griffin; Robert A Colbert; Susan D Thompson
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Elevated expression of the interleukin-8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 in peripheral blood cells in obstructive coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Deborah A Leonard; Michael E Merhige; Brent A Williams; Robert S Greene
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.439

7.  Blood Biomarkers Associated with Cognitive Decline in Early Stage and Drug-Naive Parkinson's Disease Patients.

Authors:  Jose A Santiago; Judith A Potashkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Effects of processing conditions on stability of immune analytes in human blood.

Authors:  Andres Gottfried-Blackmore; Samuel J S Rubin; Lawrence Bai; Sheun Aluko; Yujun Yang; Walter Park; Aida Habtezion
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.