Literature DB >> 30022560

Validation studies of claims data in the Asia-Pacific region: A comprehensive review.

Nana Koram1, Megan Delgado1, James H Stark2, Soko Setoguchi3, Cynthia de Luise2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe published validation studies of administrative health care claims data in the Asia-Pacific region.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed for English language articles published through 31-Oct-2017 in humans from 10 Asian-Pacific countries or regions (Japan, Australia, New Zealand, China, Hong Kong, India, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand) that validated claims-based diagnoses with a gold standard data source. Search terms included the: validation, validity, accuracy, sensitivity, agreement, specificity, positive predictive value, kappa, kappa coefficient, and Cohen's kappa.
RESULTS: Forty-three studies across six countries were identified: Australia (21); Japan (6); South Korea (6); Taiwan (7); Singapore (2); and New Zealand (1). Gold standard diagnoses were obtained from: medical records (18); registry data (11); self-reported questionnaires (5); and other data sources (9). Validity measures used included sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (12); sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (4); sensitivity and specificity (4); sensitivity and positive predictive value (4); and combinations of other measures (19). Validated outcomes included medical conditions (28); disease-specific comorbidities (8); death, smoking, and other (ie, injury, hospital outcome measures) (5); medication/transfusion (2). Approximately 72% of the studies were published within the last 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Validation studies of claims data published in the English language in the Asia-Pacific region are very limited. Given the increased reliance on administrative health care databases for pharmacoepidemiology and the need for ensuring the credibility of results from such data, additional support for the conduct of validation research of claims data in the Asia-Pacific region is needed.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asia-Pacific; administrative health care databases; health insurance claims; literature review; pharmacoepidemiology; validation studies

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30022560     DOI: 10.1002/pds.4616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  10 in total

1.  Use of diagnostic likelihood ratio of outcome to evaluate misclassification bias in the planning of database studies.

Authors:  Yoichi Ii; Shintaro Hiro; Yoshiomi Nakazuru
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 2.  Narrative Review: The Process of Expanding the Manual of Antimicrobial Stewardship by the Government of Japan.

Authors:  Kazuaki Jindai; Yoshiki Kusama; Yoshiaki Gu; Hitoshi Honda; Norio Ohmagari
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.271

Review 3.  Context and Considerations for Use of Two Japanese Real-World Databases in Japan: Medical Data Vision and Japanese Medical Data Center.

Authors:  Thomas Laurent; Jason Simeone; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Takahiro Hirano; Sophie Graham; Ryozo Wakabayashi; Robert Phillips; Tatsuya Isomura
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2022-03-18

4.  Validity of Administrative Data for Identifying Birth-Related Outcomes with the End Date of Pregnancy in a Japanese University Hospital.

Authors:  Kentaro Tajima; Tomofumi Ishikawa; Fumiko Matsuzaki; Aoi Noda; Kei Morishita; Ryusuke Inoue; Noriyuki Iwama; Hidekazu Nishigori; Junichi Sugawara; Masatoshi Saito; Taku Obara; Nariyasu Mano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Validation of a claims-based algorithm to identify cases of ulcerative colitis in Japan.

Authors:  Haruei Ogino; Hiromu Morikubo; Keita Fukaura; Tasuku Okui; Sean Gardiner; Naonobu Sugiyama; Noritoshi Yoshii; Tsutomu Kawaguchi; Haoqian Chen; Edward Nonnenmacher; Soko Setoguchi; Naoki Nakashima; Taku Kobayashi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.369

6.  Validity of ICD-10-CM Codes Used to Identify Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in Administrative Claims Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Outpatient Claims Dataset.

Authors:  Ming-Jen Sheu; Fu-Weng Liang; Sheng-Tun Li; Chung-Yi Li; Tsung-Hsueh Lu
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.790

7.  Identifying incident cancer cases in dispensing claims: A validation study using Australia's Repatriation Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) data.

Authors:  B Daniels; H E Tervonen; S-A Pearson
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2019-03-19

8.  Validity of Claims Diagnosis Codes for Cardiovascular Diseases in Diabetes Patients in Japanese Administrative Database.

Authors:  Yasuhisa Ono; Yusuke Taneda; Tomomi Takeshima; Kosuke Iwasaki; Atsutaka Yasui
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Validity of claims-based algorithms for selected cancers in Japan: Results from the VALIDATE-J study.

Authors:  Cynthia de Luise; Naonobu Sugiyama; Toshitaka Morishima; Takakazu Higuchi; Kayoko Katayama; Sho Nakamura; Haoqian Chen; Edward Nonnenmacher; Ryota Hase; Sadao Jinno; Mitsuyo Kinjo; Daisuke Suzuki; Yoshiya Tanaka; Soko Setoguchi
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Identification and Validation of Hemophilia-Related Outcomes on Japanese Electronic Medical Record Database (Hemophilia-REAL V Study).

Authors:  Takashi Fujiwara; Chisato Miyakoshi; Takashi Kanemitsu; Yasuyuki Okumura; Hironobu Tokumasu
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2021-07-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.